Skip to main content
  • Original Article/Environmental Sciences
  • Published:

Influences of solution pH and redox potential on the bioleaching of LiCoO2 from spent lithium-ion batteries

Abstract

The influences of solution pH and redox potential on bioleaching of LiCoO2 from spent lithium-ion batteries using Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans were investigated. Bioleaching at different initial pH and ferrous ion (Fe2+) concentrations were carried out, and electrochemical behavior of LiCoO2 dissolution was examined to study the effect of solution redox potential on the bioleaching process. The results showed maximum cobalt dissolution at initial pH of 1.5 and initial Fe2+ concentration of 35 g/L, and cobalt dissolution showed only slight relationship with pH of solution. Nonetheless, there was improvement of cobalt dissolution at higher redox potential. The cyclic voltammograms showed that dissolution rates increase when the solution potentials are higher than 0.4 V, and rapid decrease at 1.3 V. The anodic polarization curves indicated that the corrosion, primary passive, and passivation potentials were 0.420, 0.776 and 0.802 V, respectively.

References

  • Aral H, and Angelica VS (2008) Toxicity of lithium to humans and the environment-a literature review. Ecotox Environ Safe 70, 349–356.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen SY, and Lin JG (2009) Enhancement of metal bioleaching from contaminated sediment using silver ion. J Hazard Mater 161, 893–899.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dewulf J, Vorsta GV, Denturck K, Langenhove HV, Ghyoot W, Jan Tytgat J et al., (2010) Recycling rechargeable lithium ion batteries: Critical analysis of natural resource savings. Resour Conserv Recy 54, 229–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gericke M, Govender Y, and Pinches A (2010) Tank bioleaching of low-grade chalcopyrite concentrates using redox control. Hydrometallurgy 104, 414–419.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hansford GS, and Vargas T (2001) Chemical and electrochemical basis of bioleaching processes. Hydrometallurgy 9, 13–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li HX, Qiu GZ, and Hu YH (2006) Electrochemical behavior of chalcopyrite in presence of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. T Nonferr Metal Soc 16, 1240–1245.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li JH, Shi PX, and Wang ZF (2009) A combined recovery process of metals in spent lithium-ion batteries. Chemosphere 7, 1132–1136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Ge J, and Wu F (2010) Recovery of cobalt and lithium from spent lithium ion batteries using organic citric acid as leachant. J Hazard Mater 176, 288–293.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood MN, and Turner AK (1985) The selective leaching of zinc from chalcopyrite-sphalerite concentrates using slurry electrodes. Hydrometallury 14, 317–329.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra D, Kim DJ, and Ralph DE (2008) Bioleaching of metals from spent lithium ion secondary batteries using Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Waste Manag 28, 333–338.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Modak JM, Natarajan KA, and Mukhopadhyay S (1996) Development of temperature tolerant strains of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans to improve bioleaching kinetics. Hydrometallurgy 42, 51–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olson GJ, Brierley CL, and Briggs AP (2002) Bioleaching review part B: Progress in bioleaching: applications of microbial processes by the minerals industries. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 63, 249–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulino JF, Busnard NG, and Afonso JC (2008) Recovery of valuable elements from spent Li-batteries. J Hazard Mater 150, 843–849.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen J, and Dixon DG (2007) Modelling zinc heap bioleaching. Hydrometallurgy 85, 127–143.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Third KA, Cord-Ruwisch R, and Watling HR (2002) Control of the redox potential by oxygen limitation improves bacterial leaching of chalcopyrite. Biotechnol Bioeng 20, 433–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang RC, Lin YC, and Wu SH (2009) A novel recovery process of metal values from the cathode active materials of the lithium-ion secondary batteries. Hydrometallurgy 99, 194–201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Watling HR (2006) The bioleaching of sulphide minerals with emphasis on copper sulphides-A review. Hydrometallurgy 84, 81–108.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wen SM, Zhao ZW, and Huo GS (2005) Thermodynamic analysis and potential-pH diagrams of Li-Co-H2O system. Chinese Journal of Powder Sources 29, 423–426.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xin BP, Zhang D, and Zhang X (2009) Bioleaching mechanism of Co and Li from spent lithium-ion battery by the mixed culture of acidophilic sulfuroxidizing and iron-oxidizing bacteria. Bioresour Technol 100, 6163–6169.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yelloji RK, Mirajkar A, and Natarajan KA (1997) Growth and attachment of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans during sulfide mineral leaching. Int J Miner Process 50, 203–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gui-sheng Zeng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, L., Zeng, Gs., Luo, Sl. et al. Influences of solution pH and redox potential on the bioleaching of LiCoO2 from spent lithium-ion batteries. J Korean Soc Appl Biol Chem 56, 187–192 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13765-013-3016-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13765-013-3016-x

Keywords