Skip to main content
  • Note
  • Published:

Investigation of microbial communities in water dispensers

Abstract

Water dispensers remove disinfectant residues from tap water and thus are commonly present in Korean households; however, microbial contamination in water dispensers has recently become a major issue. To understand the occurrence of microbial contamination in water dispensers, we investigated microbial contamination in different dispenser types through heterotrophic plate count (HPC) and MiSeq-based microbial community analyses. Two newly purchased water dispensers were placed in a basement room and left for approximately 2 months; the HPC analysis indicated microbial contamination in the drinking water collected from these dispensers (160,000 and 48,000 CFU/mL, respectively). Taxonomic classification indicated that the basement dispensers were likely contaminated by freshwater bacteria, such as Acidovorax and Methylotenera. However, two dispensers located at the half landing and the first floor showed lower microbial contamination (110 and 78 CFU/mL, respectively). Furthermore, frequently used dispenser on the first floor showed higher HPCs on the faucet surface, which were classified as general oral bacteria like Hyphobacterium. We also observed that a deserted dispenser (6-year-old with no maintenance) placed on the half landing showed the least HPCs, although it seemed to have lost its filtration ability. Our results suggested that removal of disinfectant residues leads to an increase in the freshwater bacterial population in water tanks within dispensers, which could be avoided by frequent water circulation.

Introduction

Due to the fast industrial development, more than 95% of mines in Korea are abandoned [1]. Besides, heavy metals, organic materials such as herbicides [2] and livestock fecal materials [3] are known pollutants for drinking water and usually disinfected at wastewater treatment plants by chlorination and ozone oxidation [4]. However, residual disinfection by-products such as trihalomethane have been reported carcinogenic [5]. In Korea, water dispensers are commonly present in households and public facilities such as schools and hospitals, with the purpose of removing disinfectant residues from tap water. Most of the dispensers in Korea are of the direct-piping type, which filter tap water through filters (sediment and activated carbon) and membranes: Sediment filters remove relatively bigger particles, including sand and dust and carbon filters remove odor and smaller particles by chemical absorption, while membranes, employed in ultrafiltration (UF) and reverse osmosis (RO), remove fine particles including microbes. Filtered tap water is then stored in a container within the dispenser, being heated or cooled before use.

Water dispensers can be contaminated with microbes and biofilms if not cleaned for a long duration [6]. In Taiwan, water dispensers in a hospital were found to be contaminated with Legionella, which lead to nosocomial neonatal Legionellosis [7]. Moreover, although air infection is usually suspected to be involved in the spread of the airborne pathogenic bacterium Mycobacterium chimera, causing nosocomial cardiovascular infection, Haller et al. [8] reported that M. chimera was prevalent in temperature-controlled water dispensers.

Since not all the drinking water present in dispensers is contaminated with bacteria, the mechanism underlying entrance and proliferation of microbes in water dispensers needs to be clarified. Hence, we investigated the microbial quality of tap water, water inside the dispensers, drinking water obtained from dispensers, surface area of the faucet, and air near the dispensers.

Materials and methods

Description of the dispensers

Four water dispensers were used in this study (A, B, C, and D), equipped with different types of filtration systems. Table S1 summarizes the dispensers used in this study with information including filtration systems, locations, and purchase date. Basement dispensers A and B were purchased in December 2016, only for this study, and thus they had never been used for drinking water, whereas dispenser C was purchased in 2010 and placed on the stair-way between the basement and the first floor. This old dispenser’s faucet was decolorated to blue, and there was no biofilm on the surface. Maintenance for dispenser C had never been carried out, and dispenser C had been hardly used for drinking water. Lastly, dispenser D was purchased in January 2016 and placed on the first floor and was frequently used for drinking water. All water samples were collected in January 2017.

Heterotrophic plate counts

Heterotrophic plate counts (HPCs) were obtained by spreading serially diluted water samples on plate count agar and incubated for 48 h at 35 °C. Water samples were obtained from tap water, before and after each filtration, and water storage tank within the dispensers. Swab samples were collected from the surface of faucet, then suspended in sterile water and used for HPC. Air bacteria HPCs were measured by filtering 100 L of air near each dispenser.

MiSeq-based microbial community analysis

Approximately, 200 mL water was filtered through 0.45-µm sterile membrane (Advantec, Tokyo, Japan) and used to extract DNA with PowerWater DNA isolation kit (MOBIO, USA). The DNA samples were sent to Macrogen Inc. (Seoul, Republic of Korea) for sequencing V3–4 region of 16S rRNA genes using Illumina’s MiSeq platform (300 bp × 2) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Obtained MiSeq reads were processed using MOTHUR [9] according to MiSeq SOP (https://www.mothur.org/wiki/MiSeq_SOP). Reads were aligned with Silva database [10], and UCHIME [11] was used to remove chimeric sequences. Taxonomic classification was done using the GreenGene database [12]. Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were calculated at a distance of 0.03 using MOTHUR opticlust method. Cluster analysis was done based on Yue and Clayton coefficients with MOTHUR tree.shared subroutine. The differential abundance test was conducted using linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) [13].

Results and discussion

Quantification and taxonomic composition of bacteria in the dispensers

HPC analysis results (Table S2) and bacterial taxonomic composition are summarized in Fig. 1. Pseudomonas and an unclassified genus belonging to the family Rhizobiaceae were commonly found in almost all water and air samples obtained in this study. HPC analysis detected no bacteria in tap water from all the dispensers tested in this study. Dispenser A and B showed greater HPCs in water obtained from their storage tank and in the obtained drinking water. The relative abundance of the genera Acidovorax, which has been found in tap water and dispensers [14] and is capable of forming a biofilm [15], and Methylotenera, together known as freshwater bacteria [16], increased in dispenser A and B, respectively, suggesting that these bacteria proliferated in stored water since the dispensers were not in use and the water had not been circulated for a long time. Dispenser C showed the lowest HPCs among all dispensers, although it had not been in use for more than 6 years nor had it undergone any maintenance. It is likely that dispenser C lost its filtration ability, and perhaps, it failed to remove residual chlorine; consequently, bacterial growth may have been inhibited less as previously suggested [17]. Dispenser D, which was used frequently, also showed low HPCs compared to dispensers A and B. Relatively higher HPCs were observed in the pre-carbon filter of dispenser D, but it decreased during the subsequent membrane filtration steps. Further study is needed to understand about the increase in bacterial count in the pre-carbon filter.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Genus-level comparison for dispensers A–D (A)–(D). Gradated blue indicates Log10 CFU/ml

Our results only suggest that the abundance of Sphingomonas, a ubiquitous freshwater bacterium, and an unknown genus affiliated to the family Comamonadaceae increased. Faucet surface swab HPCs were higher in dispenser B and D samples. The dispenser B swab samples comprised Pseudomonas, Methylotenera, and unclassified genera belonging to the families Comamonadaceae and Rhizobiaceae that were also found prevalent in drinking water. Dispenser D swab samples mostly comprised Hyphomicrobium, known general oral bacteria [18] and were detected neither in water samples nor in air samples, suggesting that the bacteria were transferred from cups and an unclassified genus belonging to the family Sphingomonadaceae.

Microbial community comparison based on OTUs

After normalizing the data size, 39,328 reads per sample were obtained. Minimum coverage was higher than 0.999 (data not shown), and number of OTUs per sample ranged from 17 to 127. Differential abundance test showed no significant difference between tap water and air microbial communities (data not shown). Results shown in Fig. 2 indicated clear separations between water samples before and after filtration for the basement dispensers A and B (cluster I and II), while only faucet surface swabs showed similar separations in water samples from dispenser C and D (cluster I and II). Differential abundance test between clusters was performed, and the results are summarized in Table 1. The basement dispensers A and B showed a significant increase in the abundance of the freshwater bacteria Acidovorax and Methylotenera (P < 0.05) in the water storage although these bacteria were hardly found at the filtration steps and in the air. Therefore, the source of these bacteria is likely from the tap water and removal of the disinfectant residue allowed them to proliferate in the storage tank. Dispenser C showed significant increase in the abundance of Rhodococcus and Mycoplana, both of which are ubiquitous environmental bacteria, on the faucet surface. Dispenser D showed significant increase in the abundance of Hyphomicrobium and of an unknown genus belonging to the family Rhizobiaceae and Bradyrhizobiaceae. As aforementioned, Hyphomicrobium is an oral bacterium, and the dispenser D faucet may be contaminated with bacteria transferred from cups.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Cluster analysis of microbial communities obtained from each dispenser A–D (A)–(D)

Table 1 Top 5 LDA effect size in each cluster shown in Fig. 2

HPC analysis is often used to investigate the microbial quality of water; however, our results showed that taxonomical classification of the bacteria also helps understand the potential sources of bacteria. In this study, we observed higher HPCs in the drinking water stored in nonused dispensers, suggesting that waterborne bacteria may proliferate if stored water is not circulated. However, frequently used dispensers may show higher HPCs around the faucet owing to externally transferred bacteria. Our results also suggest that freshwater bacteria do not proliferate if disinfectant residues are not removed. Together, our results suggested that HPC and next generation sequencing (NGS)-based microbial community analyses provide a better understanding of water dispenser microbial contamination than using HPC analysis alone. Further study may include various environmental factors such as temperature and light conditions to determine critical factors that affect microbial distribution in water dispensers in general.

References

  1. Kim SC, Oh SJ, Oh SM, Lee SP, Yang JE (2017) In situ reclamation of closed coal mine waste in Korea using coal ash. Appl Biol Chem 60:265–272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jung J-W, Park H-N, Yoon K-S, Choi D-H, Lim B-J (2013) Event mean concentrations (EMCs) and first flush characteristics of runoff from a public park in Korea. J Korean Soc Appl Biol Chem 56:597–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kumar RR, Park BJ, Cho JY (2013) Application and environmental risks of livestock manure. J Korean Soc Appl Biol Chem 56:497–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rahman M, Kim T-H, Kwon G-S, Yang JE, Park M, Kim J-E (2009) Removal efficiency of the herbicide oxadiazon in treatment processes for drinking water. J Korean Soc Appl Biol Chem 52:252–257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kumari M, Gupta SK, Mishra BK (2015) Multi-exposure cancer and non-cancer risk assessment of trihalomethanes in drinking water supplies—a case study of Eastern region of India. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 113:433–438

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Farhadkhani M, Nikaeen M, Akbari Adergani B, Hatamzadeh M, Nabavi BF, Hassanzadeh A (2014) Assessment of drinking water quality from bottled water coolers. Iran J Public Health 43:674–681

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wei SH, Chou P, Tseng LR, Lin HC, Wang JH, Sheu JN, Liu MT, Liu FC, Wu HH, Lin MC, Ko CF, Lin HY, Kao PH, Hwang KP, Hsu YL, Kuo TL, Chiang CS (2014) Nosocomial neonatal legionellosis associated with water in infant formula, Taiwan. Emerg Infect Dis 20:1921–1924

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Haller S, Holler C, Jacobshagen A, Hamouda O, Abu Sin M, Monnet DL, Plachouras D, Eckmanns T (2016) Contamination during production of heater-cooler units by Mycobacterium chimaera potential cause for invasive cardiovascular infections: results of an outbreak investigation in Germany, April 2015 to February 2016. Euro Surveill 21

  9. Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, Lesniewski RA, Oakley BB, Parks DH, Robinson CJ, Sahl JW, Stres B, Thallinger GG, Van Horn DJ, Weber CF (2009) Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:7537–7541

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, Peplies J, Glockner FO (2013) The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res 41:D590–D596

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC, Quince C, Knight R (2011) UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 27:2194–2200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. McDonald D, Price MN, Goodrich J, Nawrocki EP, DeSantis TZ, Probst A, Andersen GL, Knight R, Hugenholtz P (2012) An improved Greengenes taxonomy with explicit ranks for ecological and evolutionary analyses of bacteria and archaea. ISME J 6:610–618

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Segata N, Izard J, Waldron L, Gevers D, Miropolsky L, Garrett WS, Huttenhower C (2011) Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol 12:R60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Furuhata K, Ishizaki N, Fukuyama M (2015) Bacterial contamination in cold water samples obtained from water dispensers. Biocontrol Sci 20:147–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Heijstra BD, Pichler FB, Liang Q, Blaza RG, Turner SJ (2009) Extracellular DNA and type IV pili mediate surface attachment by Acidovorax temperans. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 95:343–349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jia S, Shi P, Hu Q, Li B, Zhang T, Zhang XX (2015) Bacterial community shift drives antibiotic resistance promotion during drinking water chlorination. Environ Sci Technol 49:12271–12279

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sacchetti R, De Luca G, Dormi A, Guberti E, Zanetti F (2014) Microbial quality of drinking water from microfiltered water dispensers. Int J Hyg Environ Health 217:255–259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wade WG (2013) The oral microbiome in health and disease. Pharmacol Res 69:137–143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was conducted as a project of National Institute of Environmental Research funded by the Korean government (1900-1946-303-210).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hyenmi Chung or Tatsuya Unno.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 85 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, S., Farooq, A., Jo, H. et al. Investigation of microbial communities in water dispensers. Appl Biol Chem 60, 667–672 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13765-017-0325-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13765-017-0325-5

Keywords