Skip to main content

Table 2 Docking energy between MauG and ligand in rotated and non-rotated states

From: Identification of 7-hydroxyindole as an alternative substrate of MauG by in silico and in vitro analysis

 

4-benzyloxyindole

5-benzyloxyindole

6-benzyloxyindole

5-hydroxyindole

6-hydroxyindole

Non-rotated docking energy (kcal/mol)

Highest energy

− 7.1

− 7.0

− 5.2

− 6.9

− 5.0

Lowest energy

− 5.0

− 5.3

− 4.1

− 5.3

− 4.2

 

7-hydroxyindole

6-methoxyindole

D-tryptophan

L-tryptophan

Methyl-L-tryptophanate

Non-rotated docking energy (kcal/mol)

Highest energy

− 5.1

− 5.5

− 6.6

− 6.3

− 6.4

Lowest energy

− 3.9

− 4.3

− 4.9

− 5.1

− 4.7

Rotated docking energy (kcal/mol)

 

4-benzyloxyindole

5-benzyloxyindole

6-benzyloxyindole

5-hydroxyindole

6-hydroxyindole

Rotated docking energy (kcal/mol)

Highest energy

− 5.9

− 6.1

− 5.1

− 6.0

− 5.1

Lowest energy

− 4.9

− 4.7

− 3.9

− 4.6

− 4.2

 

7-hydroxyindole

6-methoxyindole

D-tryptophan

L-tryptophan

Methyl-L-tryptophanate

Rotated docking energy (kcal/mol)

Highest energy

− 4.9

− 5.9

− 5.7

− 6.0

− 5.6

Lowest energy

− 3.9

− 4.3

− 4.4

− 4.4

− 4.3

  1. The docking energy is similar among the ligands