Skip to main content
Fig. 5 | Applied Biological Chemistry

Fig. 5

From: Transcriptome profiling uncovers the involvement of CmXyn1, a glycosyl hydrolase 11, in Cochliobolus miyabeanus pathogenicity

Fig. 5

Rice-C. miyabeanus interaction and molecular signaling mechanism in rice plants is mediated by effector-triggered immunity (ETI) and receptor signaling. Transcriptome analysis in C. miyabeanus (in planta) reveals the expression of genes pertaining to cell wall hydrolyzing and proteolytic enzymes expressed at 36 and 60 hpi. Plant defense against C. miyabeanus mediates through gene expression for PR protein, metabolic enzymes, and cell wall hydrolyzing enzymes. various genes for Receptor-Like Kinases (RLK) exhibit upregulation in response to C. miyabeanus interaction in rice plants. (PAMP—pathogen-associated molecular pattern, DAMP—damage-associated molecular patterns). The following are the genes that are classified under each category. Cell wall modifying enzymes: chitin deacetylase, endo-1,4-β-xylanase I. Transcription factors, defense genes: thaumatin, MLO domain-containing protein. PR-proteins: dirigent, osmotin, WIP3—wound-induced protein, nepenthesin. Virulence proteins (Effectors): SnodProt 1, candidapepsin, peptidyl-prolyl cis–trans isomerase B. Metabolic & cell wall hydrolyzing enzymes: glutamate dehydrogenase protein, RIPER1-Ripening-related family protein, citrate-binding protein. Receptors/RLKs: brassinosteroid insensitive 1-associated receptor kinase 1, gp176, cytoplasmic kinase MRH 1

Back to article page