Cellobiose dehydrogenase from the agaricomycete Coprinellus aureogranulatus and its application for the synergistic conversion of rice straw

From the biotechnological viewpoint, the enzymatic disintegration of plant lignocellulosic biomass is a promising goal since it would deliver fermentable sugars for the chemical sector. Cellobiose dehydrogenase (CDH) is a vital component of the extracellular lignocellulose-degrading enzyme system of fungi and has a great potential to improve catalyst efficiency for biomass processing. In the present study, a CDH from a newly isolated strain of the agaricomycete Coprinellus aureogranulatus (CauCDH) was successfully purified with a specific activity of 28.9 U mg−1. This pure enzyme (MW = 109 kDa, pI = 5.4) displayed the high oxidative activity towards β-1–4-linked oligosaccharides. Not least, CauCDH was used for the enzymatic degradation of rice straw without chemical pretreatment. As main metabolites, glucose (up to 165.18 ± 3.19 mg g−1), xylose (64.21 ± 1.22 mg g−1), and gluconic acid (5.17 ± 0.13 mg g−1) could be identified during the synergistic conversion of this raw material with the fungal hydrolases (e.g., esterase, cellulase, and xylanase) and further optimization by using an RSM statistical approach.


Introduction
As alternative feedstock for biotechnological and industrial applications, lignocellulosic materials like wood and agricultural residues become more and more economically important, not least against the background of intensified utilization of biomass in the sense of the biorefinery concept and the idea of sustainable development. Agricultural crops in Asia are primarily based on wet rice cultivation, annual production of which leaves roughly 600 to 800 million tons of rice straw accounting for 90% of the worldwide amount [1]. Despite the wide potential of rice straw, the challenging goal in converting this lignocellulosic biomass is to produce value-added chemicals at high selectivity and commercial efficiency. Thus, rice straw generally contains complex cell wall polymers such as cellulose (32-39 wt%), hemicellulose (20-36 wt%), and lignin (14 wt%-22 wt%), along with silica and other minor components (10-17wt%) [2], which provide rigidity and mechanical stability and protecting it from microbial and enzymatic attack.
To get more insight into the fungal CDH system, we describe herein the production, purification and characterization of a CDH from a newly isolated fungus Coprinellus aureogranulatus (designated as CauCDH). This agaricomycete was chosen as one of the most efficient CDH producers from nearly fifty fungal strains in our previous screening and selection strategies [17]. Not least, the enzymatic degradation of rice straw without chemical pretreatment was optimized by using the pure CauCDH catalysed synergistically with various hydrolases (e.g., esterase, cellulase, and xylanase) to improve the efficiency of the conversion process.

Fungal isolation
The fungus (initially designated as MPG14) growing on deciduous deadwood was collected in the Muong Phang primeval forest (21°27'N, 103°09'E), Dien Bien Province, Northwest Vietnam and isolated using 2% malt-agar plates supplemented with antibiotics (0.005% streptomycin, penicillin, chloramphenicol, benomyl and 0.004% nystatin). The fungal strain used in this study was purified by repeated sub-culturing on potato dextrose agar (PDA; Merck, Germany) and preserved at − 80 °C (25% glycerol); it has been deposited at the Vietnam Type Culture Collection (VTTC, Vietnam) under accession number VTCC 930003.

Molecular identification and phylogenetic analysis
The fungal isolate was identified based on the sequence of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the ribosomal gene repeat unit. The genomic DNA was isolated using Plant/Fungi DNA isolation Kit (Norgenbiotek, Canada) and purified using the GeneJET genomic DNA purification kit (Thermo Scientific, USA), following the manufacturer's instructions. The genomic DNA amplification was achieved by PCR technique with the following primers ITS1: TCC GTA GGT GAA CCT GCG G and ITS4: TCC TCC GCT TAT TGA TAT GC [19]. The 25 μL reaction mixture contained 3 μL of genomic DNA (10-20 ng); 7 μL distilled H 2 O; 12.5 µL of PCR Master mix kit (2X); 1.25 μL of each primer (10 pmol/μL). The following PCR thermal cycle parameters were used: 94 °C for 3 min, 35 cycles of 45 s at 94 °C, 45 s at 55 °C, and 45 s at 72 °C and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The amplified products were purified by using Qiaquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen, USA). The sequences obtained were analyzed in the ABI Prism 3100 genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems) and compared with GenBank databases (nr) using BLAST tool.
Phylogenetic trees were constructed by using maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) [20,21]. The BI summarized two independent runs of four Markov Chains for 10,000,000 generations. A tree was sampled every 100 generations, and a consensus topology was calculated for 70,000 trees after discarding the first 30,001 trees (burn-in = 3,000,000). Parameter estimates and convergence was checked using Tracer v1.7.1 [22]. Strength of nodal support in the ML tree was analyzed using non-parametric bootstrapping (MLBS) with 1,000 replicates. Pairwise comparisons of uncorrected sequence divergences (p-distance) were calculated in Mega 7.0 [23].

Enzyme activity assay
CDH activity was assayed by recording the decrease in absorbance of 2,6-dichlorophenol indophenol (DCIP) at 520 nm in a reaction mixture (200 μL) containing 0.3 mM DCIP, 30 mM lactose and 4 mM NaF in 100 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.0). The reaction was initiated by adding an appropriate amount of enzyme extract or purified CDH, and incubation of reaction mixtures occurred at 37 °C for 5 min [24].

Production and purification of cellobiose dehydrogenase
The production of the CDH of C. aureogranulatus (strain MPG14) was performed in the sterile plastic bags, each containing about 500 g rice straw. After three weeks of fungal growth, the proteins were extracted with the distilled water, then the mycelium and straw particles were removed by centrifugation (10,000 × g for 10 min) and filtration (filter GF6; Whatman, UK). The clear supernatant was repeatedly dialyzed and concentrated in a tangential flow ultrafiltration system at 11 °C (10 kDa cut-off; Sartorius, Germany).
Subsequently, the crude enzyme preparation was purified by three steps of fast protein liquid chromatography (FPLC) using an ÄKTA Pure system (GE Healthcare, Danderyd, SWE) with a detector operating at 280 nm. The first and final separation steps by ion-exchange chromatography were carried out on DEAE-Sepharose and HiTrap ™ Q FF columns, respectively, using sodium acetate buffer (50 mM, pH 5.0) as the mobile phase. Elution of the target protein was performed with the same buffer and an increasing sodium chloride gradient (0 to 1.5 M for DEAE-Sepharose and 0 to 0.5 M for the HiTrap ™ Q FF column respectively). The second purification step was performed by size-exclusion chromatography using a Superdex ™ 75 column and sodium acetate buffer (50 mM, pH 5.0) containing sodium chloride (100 mM) as the eluent. The fractions with CDH activity were pooled, dialyzed against 10 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 6.0), and stored at − 80 °C for further use.

Enzyme characterization
Molecular weight (M W ) of the purified enzyme was determined by SDS-PAGE (NuPAGE Novex 10% Bis-Tris gel; Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany) using an omniPAGE Mini vertical electrophoresis system (Cleaver Scientific, Warwickshire, UK). Analytical isoelectric focusing (IEF) was performed with the same electrophoresis system but using IEF precast gels (Novex IEF gel; Invitrogen) under the conditions described previously [25]. The protein bands were visualized in the gels with a colloidal blue staining kit (Invitrogen). Protein concentrations were determined by using a Roti-Nanoquant protein assay kit (Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) with bovine serum albumin as the standard.

Spectral studies
Spectra of purified CauCDH were recorded in the range from 250 to 700 nm in both the oxidized and the reduced states using a Spark microplate reader (Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland). The spectrum of the reduced enzyme was prepared from its oxidized form by adding 500 mM of cellobiose. The purity of the enzyme from C. aureogranulatus was also assessed using the ratio of the absorbances at 420 and 280 nm of CDH in its oxidized form [6].

Effects of temperature and pH on enzyme activity and stability
The pH profile of purified CauCDH was determined using the assay with DCIP as described above at pH values ranging from pH 4.0 to 8.0. The pH stability of CauCDH was evaluated by incubating the enzyme at 25 °C for different time periods in 100 mM sodium citrate buffer, pH 4.0 as well as in sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0 and 8.0.
The temperature optimum was determined by measuring the enzyme activity of CauCDH at different temperatures (30-70 °C) in 100 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.5). The effect of temperature on enzyme stability was studied at 25 °C, 50 °C, and 70 °C in sodium acetate buffer (100 mM, pH 5.5). After incubation intervals of 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 h, aliquots of the samples were taken for measurement of the residual CDH activities.

Kinetic parameters and substrate specificity
The Michaelis-Menten constant (K m ), catalytic constant (k cat ) of the purified enzyme from C. aureogranulatus MPG14 were determined for various CDH substrates and electron acceptors ( Table 2). Kinetics of electron acceptors were measured at 520 nm with 20 mM cellobiose as the electron donor, while DCIP (0.3 mM) was used as the electron acceptor to determine the kinetics of substrate oxidations [28].

Synergistic conversion of rice straw by an enzymatic cocktail containing CauCDH
The rice straw was ground to a fine powder (particle size 40 × 40 µm, determined microscopically). This material (3%, wt/vol) was incubated with CauCDH (specific activity ≥ 28.0 U mg −1 ) and other selected enzymes (presented in supplementary material, Additional file 1: Table S1) in 100 mM sodium citrate buffer at pH 6.0, at 37 °C under continuous shaking at 50 × g. To follow both synergistic effects and the single effects of each enzyme, enzymatic conversion was performed with each enzyme alone and in combinations on the one hand with all hydrolases [in-house AE from X. polymorpha and commercial AB Enzymes preparation (Cell/Xyl)] and on the other hand, with all tested enzymes. Controls containing heat-denatured enzymes (95 °C for 15 min) were used for comparison. After that, aliquots were taken and the amount of released carbohydrates was quantified by using a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system (1200 series, Agilent, Waldbronn, Germany). The samples were equilibrated at 80 °C in the headspace oven, followed by injection onto a Rezex ™ ion-exclusion column [RPM-Monosaccharide Pb +2 (8%), 7.8 mm × 300 mm, Phenomenex ® ] and monitoring the eluting substances with a refractive-index (RI) detector. For gluconic acid determination, the same HPLC system was used but equipped with a Shim-pack CLC-NH 2 column (150 mm × 6 mm, Shimadzu, CA, U.S.A) and a UV detector operating at 210 nm.

Experimental design for optimization by response surface methodology (RSM)
Enzymatic conversion of lignocellulose-rich material (3% rice straw, wt/vol) by pure CauCDH and further hydrolases was optimized to improve the efficiency of the conversion process. The ratio of enzyme to straw substrate (in Units per gram biomass; U g −1 ) of each enzyme was varied according to the amplitude of the experiment.
The RSM approach, in conjunction with the Box-Behnken design, was employed to estimate the effect of three main fators (enzyme concentrations of Cell/Xyl, AE, and CauCDH) on the product yields [Y] of glucose, xylose, and gluconic acid. Procedure for the construction of the 15-experiment design matrix with the mathematical-statistical treatments and the determination of optimal conditions were carried out using Design-Expert 7.0.0 software (Stat-Ease, Minneapolis, MN, USA).
Results of preliminary single factor experiments were used as inputs in an orthogonal design matrix to determine range and central points of variables (Additional file 1: Tables S1 and S2). To be specific, in this investigation, three parameters were varied individually with other factors being kept in a fix (Additional file 1: Figure  S2). Estimating results were tested with ANOVA analysis to confirm model validity (Additional file 1: Table S3). Then, optimal conditions were calculated from the final model and verified by the actual experimental approach (Fig. 5, Additional file 1: Tables S5 and S6). The dependent variables (the above product yields) as a function of independent variables were expressed using the following second order polynomial Eq. (1).
where Ŷ is the predicted response; b 0 is the intercept coefficient; b j is the linear coefficient; b jj is the square coefficient; b uj is the interaction coefficient; X u and X j are the coded independent variables, terms of X u X j and X j 2 are the intersection and quadratic terms, respectively.
The three factors [Cell/Xyl, AE, and CauCDH (U g −1 )] chosen for this study were designated as A, B, C, respectively. The three variables were coded according to following equation: Z j was the actual value of the variable [Cell/Xyl, AE, and CauCDH (U g −1 ); Additional file 1: Table S1]; Z 0 j was the actual value of the independent variable at the center point; and Z j was the step change of the variable. A, B, C were prescribed into three levels + 1, 0, − 1 for high, intermediate, and low value, respectively.

Statistical analysis
Each experiment was performed in triplicate and the data are expressed as the mean ± SD. Statistically significant differences were realized at p < 0.05 via Student's t-test. Statistical analysis was performed using the JMP Pro. 13.2 software.

Identification of the isolated fungal strain with high CDH activity
In order to identify the fungal isolate, total DNA was extracted with suitable quality and amplified by PCR with primers (ITS1/ITS4) at an annealing temperature of 55 °C. Both ends of the gene segment were sequenced and a sequence of 453 nucleotides in length was obtained and deposited in GenBank nucleotide database (http:// www. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/ genba nk/) under the accession number MT427740. Nucleotide sequencing was then compared to the reference sequences in Gen-Bank database. The results revealed 100% identity with the sequences of species Coprinellus aureogranulatus GQ249274. Based on this genetic identification, and additional microscopic characteristics, the strain MPG14 was classified as Coprinellus aureogranulatus (Psathyrellaceae, Agaricales, Agaricomycetes, Basidiomycota; Fig. 1 and Additional file 1: Fig. S1), which is a new species for (1) Vietnam (www. gbif. org/ speci es/ 25345 97). Nevertheless, the few existing records indicate that it is a tropical to subtropical species [27].

Purification and physicochemical characterization of CDH from C. aureogranulatus
For purification studies, a sufficient amount of CDH was produced under conditions of solid-state fermentation with rice straw as growth substrate at a larger scale (0.5 kg bags) to obtain a crude extract with a total CDH activity of 1817 U (measured with DCIP). Subsequently, CDH was purified up to 41.9-fold with the yield of 22.7% starting from crude culture filtrate and resulting in a specific activity of 28.9 U mg −1 (total 412 units) by a threestep purification procedure involving anion-exchange and size-exclusion chromatography. Thus, filtrated protein aliquots of C. aureogranulatus's culture extract was applied to the first chromatographic step on the weak anion exchanger DEAE-Sepharose and most of the dark polyphenolic pigments could be removed from the CDHexhibiting protein fraction. Thereby, the specific activity of CDH increased 5.6-fold from 0.7 to 3.8 U mg −1 . The next purification step was performed on a Superdex ™ 75 column and resulted in a significant increase of the specific activity of CauCDH (up to 30.9-fold), but also in a decrease of its total activity from 889 to 549 U.
The purity of C. aureogranulatus CDH (CauCDH), after the final step on HiTrap ™ Q (Fig. 2a) columns, was assessed by 12% SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis, which revealed a distinct band with apparent molecular mass of 109 kDa. Purified CauCDH exhibited a weak acidic pI of 5.4 appearing as one homogeneous protein band in the corresponding native IEF gel after staining with colloidal blue (Fig. 2b). The purification results are summarized in Table 1. Figure 2c shows the UV-visible spectrum of purified CauCDH with the typical characteristics of a flavocytochrome-heme CDH. Thus, the Soret band at 422 nm of the oxidized enzyme indicates the heme b cofactor, while the broad shoulder between 450 and 500 nm is indicative for a reduced Flavin (FAD) [3,26]. The enzyme preparation had a high purity with an A 420 /A 280 ratio of 0.6, which is within the range of data reported previously for other fungal CDHs [28,29].
The highest relative activities of CauCDH were observed at 50 °C and pH 5.5. The enzyme activity slightly decreased under suboptimal conditions, e.g., ≤ 15% activity loss at 45 °C and 55 °C as well as at pH 5.0 and 6.0, respectively. A temperature of 70 °C caused a 50% activity loss within 2 h, and at 40 °C, over 50% of the initial activity was still detectable after 12 h of incubation. CauCDH Fig. 1 Phylogeny tree was constructed based on maximum likelihood ML method using the partial rDNA-ITS sequence of the MPG14 fungal strain. Psathyrella pygmaea MG734744 was used as an outgroup taxon in this tree activity significantly decreased after 2 h incubation at 70 °C probably due to less efficient interdomain electron transfer between heme and flavin of CDH [3]. The enzyme seems to be relatively stable at acidic and neutral conditions (i.e., pH 4.0-7.0) but lost about 80% of its activity within 2 h at pH 8.0 (Fig. 3).

Kinetic parameters and substrate specificities
As summarized in Tables 2 and 3, the broad substrate spectrum of purified CauCDH becomes evident by its ability to catalyze the oxidization of different β-1-4 linked di-and oligosaccharides (cellobiose, cellotriose, cellotetraose, lactose), whereas conversion and affinity of/for the α-1,4-linked disaccharide maltose as well as for monosaccharides such as mannose and glucose was low. Michaelis-Menten constants (K m = 117.1 up to 1,354,000 µM) and catalytic efficiencies (k cat /K m values from 25.8 × 10 4 to 21.7 M −1 s −1 for cellobiose and maltose, respectively) could be determined for all tested substrates. The highest affinity (K m = 117.1 µM) and catalytic efficiency (k cat /K m = 25.8 × 10 4 M −1 s −1 ) was ascertained for cellobiose, which is also thought to be the physiological substrate of CauCDH. Lactose used to assay CDH activity turned out be in fact a rather suitable substrate for this purpose with a high specific activity (39.3 U mg −1 ) and appreciable turnover number (k cat = 61.7 s −1 ).

Optimization of enzymatic conversion Predicted model and statistical analysis
The fundamental levels and ranges of the reaction parameters were derived from the results of single factor investigation, of which the ratio of each enzyme activity to straw substrate (i.e., Cell/Xyl, AE, and CauCDH; U g −1 ) was selected as independent variable. In general, the   most significant increase of metabolites (monosaccharides, carboxylic acid) could be observed at the enzyme ratios up to 18 U g −1 for Cell/Xyl, 35 U g −1 for AE, and 50 U g −1 for CauCDH. As the higher relative enzyme ratios led to only a slight increase of the released metabolites (Additional file 1: Fig. S2). Accordingly, three ratios of each enzyme were chosen as the survey area of the input parameters to create an experimental design matrix, such as 12, 18, 24 U g −1 of Cell/Xyl, 25, 35, 45 U g −1 of AE, and 40, 50, 60 of CauCDH, which corresponded to the low level (-1), the baseline (0), and the high level (+ 1), respectively (Additional file 1: Table S1). The dependent variables, i.e., the yields (Y) of released glucose (mg g −1 ), xylose (mg g −1 ), and gluconic acid (mg g −1 ) were determined experimentally as shown in the experimental design matrix (Additional file 1: Table S2). The model outcomes from analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the objective functions (product yields after enzymatic conversion) were evaluated using the F-value, p-value, and R 2 -value (Additional file 1: Table S3). The predicted responses of the three objective functions Y 1 , Y 2 , and Y 3 and the independent variables related by quadratic polynomial equations were given (Additional file 1: Table S4). ANOVA of the quadratic regression model demonstrated that all three models corresponding to three objective functions fitted well and were highly significant. The F-values of the Y 1 , Y 2 and Y 3 were 84.44, 110.35 and 38.60, respectively, and the p-value was less than 0.05 indicating all models to be statistically significant. The model coefficients of determination (R 2 ) were 0.9835, 0.9850 and 0.9858, respectively, suggesting that most of the yield variability can be explained by the experimental data. These data support the accuracy of the established model as well as confirm a high agreement between the measured and theoretically calculated data.

Response surface analysis
The estimated quadratic model was analyzed and plotted by using Design Expert 7.0.0 software. The x-and y-axes of 3D responsive surfaces represent the interaction of couple process parameters, i.e., the interaction of Cell/Xyl and AE (CauCDH, 50 U g −1 ); Cell/Xyl and CauCDH (AE, 35 U g −1 ); AE and CauCDH (Cell/Xyl, 18 U g −1 ). The z-axis represents one of three evaluation indices (Y 1 -glucose, Y 2 -xylose, and Y 3 -gluconic acid) and was reserved for the predicted response, resulting in three separate plots. The 3D response surfaces were constructed as shown in Fig. 4. It could be realized that the two-way interaction affected all objective functions in descending order by AB > BC > AC. This is consistent with the descending influence of single parameters in order of B > A > C (the coded variables of AE, Cell/ Xyl, and CauCDH, respectively) as shown in the quadratic equations (Additional file 1: Table S4). As shown in Fig. 4a, b, an improvement in the objective functions, i.e., Y 1 and Y 2 , could be reached following with the increased values of the single parameters A, B, C and vice versa. Uniquely, the Y 3 was improved following the increase of the single parameters A and B only, while it reduced with a raise of the parameter C (Fig. 4c). Thus, there was a direct correlation between the objective functions (i.e., Y 1 , Y 2 , and Y 3 ; Fig. 4) and the single parameters (A, B, and C) of the model equations as shown in the Additional file 1: Table S4. Of which, the influence of square parameters A 2 , B 2 , C 2 was insignificant in comparison to A, B, and C, respectively, due to their variety to be in the range of (-1, + 1).

Optimization and model verification
The desired function was used to optimize the objective functions after the enzyme catalyzed process with the expectation for the Y 1 , Y 2 , and Y 3 can reach the maximum values. As the result, 10 experimental options were found, of which the best plan to maximize the predicted objective function (as shown in Fig. 5). Thus, the optimal values of the objective functions were Y 1 = 165,689, Y 2 = 65.56, Y 3 = 5.26 (mg g −1 ); and the values of the encoded variables at the optimal conditions were A = 0.2,  Table S5). The experimental values at optimal conditions were compared with the predicted values to determine the validity of the model, which exhibited a negligible difference (Additional file 1: Table S6). This again confirms that the construction model was compatible with the experimental conditions. After optimization of three dependent variables, the optimal factors were determined to be 19.    [28] and Trametes hirsuta [10] and the agaric Termitomyces clypeatus [30], but higher than that reported for the CDH of another polypore, Pycnoporus sanguineus (14.7%) [31]. The specific activity (28.9 mg −1 at pH 5.0 and 37 °C) of purified CauCDH for DCIP was found to be noticeably higher than the respective activities of other CDHs from basidiomycetous fungi [10,29,30]. In general, however, the physical and catalytic properties of CauCDH, i.e., M W (109 kDa), pI (5.4), optimum pH and temperature (pH 5.5 and 50 °C, respectively), have been expectable and within the range of reported values for other basidiomycetous CDHs, such as of P. chrysosporium [32], Schizophyllum commune [11], T. hirsuta [10], and Trametes versicolor [33]. Among the various carbohydrates tested, di-and oligosaccharides with β-(1,4) glycosidic bonds were the best substrates, for which CauCDH exhibited high specific activities, whereas substrates with α-(1,4)-interlinkages as well as monosaccharides were just converted very slowly and with low catalytic efficiencies. Thus, CDHs preferably catalyse the oxidation of soluble β-(1,4)-linked saccharides over that of monosaccharides, which seems to be an inherent property of this fungal enzyme type [34]. Increasing the number of glucosyl units in the cellooligosaccharides tested resulted in decreasing substrate affinity (higher K m values) and lower catalytic efficiencies (k cat /K m ). This phenomenon has also been observed for other CDHs such as those from Volvariella volvacea [5] and T. clypeatus [30]. Although lactose is structurally similar to cellobiose and CauCDH exhibited the highest specific activity and turnover number for this substrate (39.3 U mg −1 and 61.7 s −1 , respectively) along with high catalytic efficiency (84.5 × 10 3 M −1 s −1 ) and moderate affinity (K m = 731 µM), cellobiose is without doubt the physiological (i.e., natural) substrate of the enzyme, with the highest affinity and catalytic efficiency of all sugars tested (K m = 117.1 µM, k cat /K m = 25.8 × 10 4 M −1 s −1 ) and appreciable turnover number (30 s −1 ) and specific activity (28.9 U mg −1 ). In this context, kinetic properties of CauCDH are consistent with those of the Class-II basidiomycetous CDHs, which exhibit higher affinities and turnover numbers for cellobiose than basidiomycetous Class-I CDHs do [3]. The enzyme acted poorly on the electron acceptors 2,6-dimethyl-1,4-benzoquinone and 2,6-dimethoxy-1,4-benzoquinone with one to two orders of magnitude higher K m -values compared to other acceptors (cyt c, DCIP, 1,4-benzoquinone) examined. We assume that substitution of 1,4-benzoquinone with two methyl or methoxy groups caused a drastic activity reduction due to steric hindrance that was also observed for a CDH from the corticoid plant pathogen Sclerotium (Athelia) rolfsii [35].
The ability of purified CauCDH to catalyze the conversion of the lignocellulosic material as an auxiliary enzyme in cooperation with polysaccharide hydrolases, i.e., cellulase/xylanase (Cell/Xyl) and acetyl esterase (AE), was tested with rice straw as target, without any chemical pre-treatment. As main metabolites, glucose, xylose, and gluconic acid were detected, which are all biotechnological interest (as renewable resources for subsequent biological or chemical conversions). Thus, supplementation of purified CDH to the optimized rice-straw reaction setup, led to a moderate but significant increase of all product yields. Cellobiose accumulation during the hydrolytic process may have caused a feedback inhibition of cellobiohydrolases and endoglucanases. It is reasonable to assume that the role of fungal CDHs is to facilitate lignocellulose degradation for the concomitant attack, depolymerizing enzymes. Similar effects were reported for the synergistic acting CDHs from P. chrysosporium [36] or V. volvacea [5] and cellulases from T. reesei. Here, carbohydrate yields were increased by adding CDH, resulting in an increased formation of gluconic acid due to the hydrolysis of cellobionic acid by β-glucosidase that was also present in the T. reesei enzymatic cocktail [37]. In addition, the desired enzymatic activity/function was applied in this study to optimize the objective functions (i.e., the yields of carbohydrates and gluconic acid) during the enzyme-catalyzed process with the expectation of their max values will reach. Accordingly, the conversion of rice straw meal by hydrolyzing enzymes, i.e., cellulases, xylanases (Cell/Xyl), and/or acetyl esterase (AE), in the presence of CauCDH could be optimized with increased amounts of released C-5 and C-6 sugars (glucose, xylose) as well as of gluconic acid.