Table 2 Comparison of the reported dicofol-degrading microorganisms
Genera | Strain | From | Initial concentration (mg/L) | Degradation efficiency | Product | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pseudomonas | P. PFD9 | India (Tea rhizosphere soil) | 10 | 70% in 24 h | Unknown | [30] |
Pseudomonas | P. PFD13 | 32% in 24 h | ||||
Exiguobacterium | E. acetylicum MA4 | Thailand (DCF-polluted soil) | 5 | 95% in 24 h | [27] | |
Bacillus | B. megaterium SSF1 | 93% in 24 h | ||||
Trametes | T. pocas | Zimbabwe (dead wood in woodlands) | 20 | 97% in 31 days | [38] | |
Unknow | DSPM95 | 95% in 31 days | ||||
Datronia | D. concentrica | 99% in 31 days | ||||
Pycnoporus | P. sanguineus | 99% in 31 days | ||||
Azospirillium | A. barasilense | Egypt (College of Agriculture, Alexandria University) | 100 | 75% in 28 days | [25] | |
Azotobacter | A. chroococcum | 94% in 28 days | ||||
Klebsilense | K. pneumoneae | 88% in 28 days | ||||
Pseudomonas | P. cepacia | USA (type culture collection) | 87% in 28 days | |||
Bacillus | B. subtilis | Egypt (soil of the wheat fields) | 85% in 28 days | |||
Pseudomonas | P. fluorescens | 82% in 28 days | ||||
Bacillus | B. polymyxa | Saudi Arabia (wheat roots of Al-Qassim fields) | 84% in 28 days | |||
Microbacterium | M.D-2 | China (DCF-polluted agricultural soil) | 50 | 84% in 24 h | DCBP | This work |