Table 2 Method validation results in soil and spinach
From: Translocation of residual ethoprophos and tricyclazole from soil to spinach
Compound | Sample | Fortification level (mg/kg) | Average recovery (%, n = 3) | RSD (%) | LOQ (mg/kg) | Regression equation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ethoprophos | Soil | 0.01 | 82.4 | 2.5 | 0.01 | y = 38,563.8x + 22,689.2 (r2 = 0.998) |
0.1 | 90.6 | 2.8 | ||||
Spinach | 0.01 | 111.6 | 5.5 | 0.01 | y = 16,269.8 x + 3783.33 (r2 = 0.999) | |
0.1 | 105.3 | 4.1 | ||||
Tricyclazole | Soil | 0.01 | 84.0 | 3.2 | 0.01 | y = 22,673.9 x + 26,218.8 (r2 = 0.999) |
0.1 | 86.2 | 4.0 | ||||
Spinach | 0.01 | 93.9 | 11.1 | 0.01 | y = 21,668.1 x + 12,473.5 (r2 = 0.996) | |
0.1 | 91.5 | 2.5 |