Compounds | Plant sources | Antiviral Activities | Assays | IC50/Binding Affinity* | Refs. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Phillyrin (KD-1) | Forsythia suspensa | SARS-CoV-2 and HCoV-229E | In vitro using cytopathic effect and plaque reduction assay in Vero E6 cells | IC50 against SARS-CoV-2 and HCoV-229E is 63.90 and 64.53Â mg/mL | [256] |
Phillyrin (KD-1) | Forsythia suspensa | SARS-CoV-2 and HCoV-229E | In vitro based on pro-inflammatory cytokine expression levels in Huh-7 cells by RT-PCR assay | Phillyrin reduced the production of proinflammatory cytokines at mRNA levels and reduced the protein expression of p-NF-κB p65, NF-κB p65, and p-IκBα | [256] |
Cannabidiol and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol | Cannabis sativa L. (Chongsam, leaves) | SARS-CoV-2 (βCoV/KOR/ KCDC03/2020) | In vitro using screening assay in Vero cells | IC50 of 7.91 mM and 10.25 mM | [257] |
Pelargonidin | Â | SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein | In vitro using Spike/ACE2 Inhibitor Screening Assay Kit and using plaque assay in Vero E6 cells | At 50Â mM reduces Spike binding to ACE2 by about 40%. Plaque assay reduces virus entry by about 70% at 100Â mM | [258] |
Juglanin | Â | 3a-protein channel of SARS-CoV | In vitro using Voltage-clamp experiments on SARS-3a protein | IC50 of 2.3Â mM | [259] |
Emodin | Genus Rheum and Polygonum | SNE (spike and envelope gene)-3a protein of SARS-CoV | In vitro using Voltage-clamp experiments on SARS-3a protein | IC50 of 20Â mM | [249] |
Emodin | Â | SARS-CoV spike protein | In vitro using luciferase assay | IC50 of 200Â mM | [250] |
ThE (composed of green tea catechin and epigallocatechin gallate EGCG; total catechins were 85–95% and total EGCG was 65–70%, caffeine < 0.5%) | Product from Mitsui Norin Co. Ltd | SARS-CoV-2 | In vivo using clinical trials. Ten patients were treated for 15 days sessions of inhalation plus three capsules per day (total catechin, 840 mg; total EGCG, 595 mg) | Seven of ten patients switched to a negative SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal swab test in a range of 6–13 days | [260] |
Curcumin Hesperidin Quercetin hydroxychloroquine | From chemical manufacturers | SARS-CoV-2 from hCoV-19/Egypt/NRC-3/2020 SARS-CoV-2 virus (Accession Number on GSAID: EPI_ISL_430820) | In vitro using plaque reduction assay in Vero E6 cells | IC50 values: Curcumin 0.44Â mM Hesperidin 13.25Â mM Quercetin 18.2Â mM Hydroxychloroquine 1.72Â mM | |
Gallocatechin gallate (GCG) Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) Quercetin | From Sigma-Aldrich | Recombinant SARS 3CLpro transformed and expressed in Pichia pastoris GS115 based on GenBank accession no. AY274119 | In vitro: proteolytic activity based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) assay In silico: using Autodock Tools software with a ligand number of 3CLpro is 2ZU5 | IC50 of: GCG = 47 mM EGCG = quercetin = 73 mM The binding energy of: GCG = − 14.1 kcal/mol, EGCG = − 11.7 kcal/mol, quercetin = − 10.2 kcal/mol SAR: EGCG and CGC have a galloyl moiety at the 3-OH position to interact with the 3CLpro active site pocket | [248] |
Myricetin |  | SARS-CoV-2 Mpro | In vitro using a proteolytic assay based on FRET In silico: using AMBER18 with ligand number of 3CLpro is 6LZE In vivo: pulmonary inflammation in bleomycin treated mice | IC50 3.684 ± 0.076 μM The binding free energy is -32.98 kcal/mol Myrcetin inhibits the infiltration of inflammatory cells and secretion of inflammatory factors in the lung | [262] |
Ginkgolic acid (GA) and anacardic acid (AA) |  | SARS-CoV-2 PLpro, SARS-CoV-2 CLpro, isolated SARS2-CoV-2 USA-WA1/2020 | In vitro using an enzymatic assay based on fluorometric peptide (FRET) assay. Antiviral determination using plaque reduction assay on Vero-E6 cells In silico using Autodock Vina with ligand 6m2n and 6WX4 | IC50 against PLpro: GA = 16.30 ± 0.64 and AA = 17.08 ± 1.20 mM IC50 against 3CL pro: GA = 1.79 ± 0.58 and AA = 2.07 ± 0.35 mM EC50 against SARS-CoV-2: GA = 8.3 ± 0.03 mM and AA = 9.0 ± 2.5 mM Inhibition at 7.5 mM: GA = 42% and AA = 13% Binding affinity of GA to 3CLpro and PLpro is -5.3 and -4.9 kcal/mol | [263] |
Curcumin, brazilin, and theaflavin-3,3’-digallate |  | SARS-CoV-2 RBD | In vitro using SARS-CoV-2 Surrogate Virus Neutralization Test Kit | % binding with RBD at 0.1 mg/mL = 100 ± 0.2; 100 ± 0.1; and 100 ± 0.1 | [34] |
Broussochalcone A (BcA); Papyriflavonol A (PA); 3’-(3-methylbut-2-enyl)-3’,4’,7-trihydroxy flavane (tHF); Broussoflavan A (BfA); Kazinol F (KF); Kazinol J (KJ) | Broussonetia papyrifera | SARS CoV-2 Mpro | In silico using AutoDock Vina on SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (6LU7) | Binding affinity (kcal/mol): BcA =− 8.1 PA =− 7.9 tHF =− 8.2 BfA =− 7.8 KF =− 8.1 KJ =− 8.0 | [264] |
Kaempferol, quercetin, luteolin-7-glucoside, demethoxycurcumin, naringenin, apigenin-7-glucoside, oleuropein, curcumin, catechin, epicatechin-gallate | From chemical manufacturers | SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro/Mpro and SARS-CoV 3CLpro/Mpro | In silico using Autodock 4.2 with Lamarckian Genetic Algorithm on Mpro (6LU7 and 2GTB) | These listed compounds were ranked by affinities (ΔG) | [265] |
Curcumin Hesperidin Quercetin hydroxychloroquine | From chemical manufacturers | SARS-CoV-2: S spike protein and main protease | In silico using MOE 2019.012 suite with S spike protein (6VW1) and Mpro (6LU7) | Binding score to S protein and Mpro: Curcumin − 7.02 and − 7.28 kcal/mol Hesperidin − 7.92 and − 8.37 kcal/mol Quercetin − 6.48 and − 6.23 kcal/mol Hydroxychloroquine -6.60 and  − 7.05 kcal/mol | [194] |
Gallocatechin gallate (GCG) Epicatechin gallate (ECG) Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) Catechin gallate (CG) Epicatechin (EC) Catechin Gallocatechin (GC) Epigallocatechin (EGC) |  | SARS-CoV-2 main protease | In silico using AutoDock Vina with Mpro (6LU7) | Three best binding energies: GCG − 9.0 kcal/mol ECG − 8.2 kcal/mol EGCG − 7.6 kcal/mol | |
Rutin |  | SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (6LU7 and 6YNQ) | In silico using Glide module | Docking score: above − 7.0; − 8.7; − 9.16 kcal/mol | |
Calceolarioside B |  | SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (6LU7), Nsp15 endoribonuclease (6VWW), coronavirus fusion protein (6LXT), SARS-CoV-2 spike ectodomain (6VYB) | In silico using Molegro Virtual Docker | MolDock score: − 191.295 − 164.77 − 141.587 − 153.135 | [268] |
5-O-D-glucopyranosyl-4'-hydroxy-7-methoxy-4-phenylcoumarin |  | SARS-CoV-2 Nsp15 endoribonuclease (6WXC) | In silico using windows MOE | Binding energy of − 10.1 kcal/mol | [269] |
Luteolin 7-O-β-glucopyranoside (cynaroside), acacetin 7-O-β-rutinoside (linarin) and isoacteoside (isoverbascoside) | Amphilophium paniculatum (L.) Kunth (leaves) | SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (7BUY) | In silico using Molecular Operating Environment (MOE) 2019.0102 | Energy score of − 9.54, − 8.54, − 8.46 kcal/mol | [270] |
Cannabidiol and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol |  | SARS-CoV-2 (6LU7) | In silico using Autodock and Vina | Binding energy in Autodock is − 10.53 and − 10.42 kcal/mol, while in Vina is − 6.43 and − 7.13 kcal/mol | [257] |
Cyanidin, malvidin, pelargonidin, peonidin, petunidin | Pimpinella anisum L. (anise) | SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro (6LU7) | In silico using AutoDock Vina | Binding energy: − 8.1; − 8.0; − 8.0; − 7.7; − 7.5 kcal/mol | [271] |
Procyanidin b2 and mangiferin | Chincona pubescenc. and from mango tree | SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro (6LU7) | In silico using AutoDock Vina | Binding affinity: -9.4 and -8.5Â kcal/mol | [272] |
Heptafuhalol A |  | SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (6LU7) | In silico using Vina and Autodock | Average ΔG = − 14.6 kcal/mol | [273] |
Oolonghomobisflavan-A | Â | SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (6Y2F) | In silico using GROMACS | Binding free energy on MM-PBSA calculation: -256.875 kj/mol | [274] |
Epigallocatechin gallate | Green tea | SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (6LU7), NSP15 endoribonuclease (6VWW), free enzyme Mpro (6Y2E), and 2019-nCoV HR2 domain (6LVN), post fusion core of S2 subunit (6LXT), prefusion spike glycoprotein (6VSB), chimeric receptor-binding domain complexed with hACE2 (6VW1) | In silico using AutoDock | Binding energy (kcal/mol): 6LU7 = − 6.99; 6LVN = − 4.90; 6LXT = − 7.57; 6VSB = − 7.26; 6VWW = − 8.38; 6Y2E = − 9.30; 6VW1 = − 8.66 | [275] |
Theaflavin digallate | Â | SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (6LU7) | In silico using GLIDE | Docking score: -10.574Â kcal/mol | [167] |
Glycyrrhizic acid (GlA) and theaflavin 3,3-digallate (TF3) |  | SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (6LU7) and ACE2 receptor (IR4L) | In silico using AutoDock Vina | Binding energy to 6LU7: GlA = − 9.3 and TF3 = − 10; and with 1R4L: GlA = − 9.6 and TF3 = − 8.3 kcal/mol | [276] |
Theaflavin |  | SARS-CoV-2 RBD | In silico using SwissDock | Idock score − 7.95 kcal/mol | [277] |
Pedunculagin, tercatain, and castalin |  | SARS-CoV-2 Mpro, catalytic dyad residues: Cys145 and His41 (6Y84) | In silico using MOE 09 | S score: − 18.58; − 23.11; and − 14.04 | [166] |
Hypericin, Amentoflavone, terflavin | Hypericum perforatum L. and Terminalia chebula Retz. or T. catappa L | SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (6LU7) | In silico using AutoDock Vina | Binding energy: − 10.4, − 9.7 and − 9.7 kcal/mol | [164] |
Eriodictyol-7-O-rutinoside, narirutin | Flavanone glycoside in lemon and sweet orange | SARS-CoV-2 RdRp protein sequence (YP_009725307.1) | In silico using AutoDock Vina | Binding energy: -9.9 and -9.7Â kcal/mol | [164] |
Cis-miyabenol C | Foeniculum vulgare Mill. (fennel) | SARS-CoV-2 human transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2: sequence NP_001128571.1) | In silico using AutoDock Vina | Binding energy: -9.4Â kcal/mol | [164] |
Ellagic acid | Prunica granatum | SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (6LU7) | In silico using AutoDock Vina | Binding affinity and IC: − 8.4 kcal/mol and 0.7 μM | [193] |
5,7,3′,4′-tetrahydroxy-2′-(3,3-dimethylallyl) isoflavone Myricitrin Methyl rosmarinate | Psorothamnus arborescens Myrica cerifera Hyptis atrorubens Poit | SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro (PMDB ID PM0082635) | In silico using MOE | Binding affinities: − 29.57 − 22.13 − 20.62 | [278] |
Agathisflavone |  | SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (pdb id: 6LU7) | In silico using AutoDock 4.1 | Binding energy: − 8.4 kcal/mol | [173] |
Albireodelphin |  | SARS-CoV-2 RdRp (pdb id: 6M71) and spike protein (pdb id: 6VW1) | In silico using AutoDock 4.1 | Binding energy: − 9.8 and − 11.2 kcal/mol | [173] |
Inophyllum G2 |  | SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (pdb id: 6LU7) | In silico using AutoDock Vina | Docking score: − 8.8 kcal/mol | [176] |
Daphnorin |  | SARS-CoV-2 viral methyltransferase (nsp16/10 complex, pdb id: 6W4H) and RBD (pdb id: 6M0J) | In silico using AutoDock Vina | Docking scores: − 9.8 and − 8.2 kcal/mol | [176] |
Isodispar B and daphnogirin |  | SARS-CoV-2 hACE2 (pdb id: 6VW1) | In silico using AutoDock Vina | Docking score: − 8.0 kcal/mol | [176] |
Isorhamnetin-3-O-rutinoside (narcissin) | Salvadora persica L | SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (pdb id: 6LU7) | In silico using AutoDock | Binding energy:− 8.2530 kcal/mol | [279] |
Acetoside | (polyherbal formulation | SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (pdb id: 6LU7) | In silico using iGEMDOCK | Binding energy: − 153.06 kcal/mol | [280] |
Demethyloleuropein |  | SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (pdb id: 6LU7) | In silico using AutoDock Vina | Binding energy: -8.90 kcal/mol IC50 prediction: 11.58 μM | [177] |
Nuzhenide oleoside |  | SARS-CoV-2 S protein (pdb id: 6LZG) | In silico using AutoDock Vina | Binding energy: − 8.90 kcal/mol. IC50 prediction: 6.44 μM | [177] |
Myricitrin Quercetin-3-O-glucuronide | Phyllanthus amarus | SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (pdb id: 6LU7) | In silico using AutoDock Vina | Binding affinity: − 9.6 kcal/mol, and − 9.4 kcal/mol | [281] |
Isorhamnetin-3-O-rutinoside (narcisin) | Salvadora persica | SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (pdb id: 6LU7) | In silico using AutoDock Vina | Docking score: − 8.2530 kcal/mol | [279] |