Skip to main content

Table 5 Potential polyphenolic compounds as antiviral agents against SARS-CoV-2

From: Recent progress on drugs discovery study for treatment of COVID-19: repurposing existing drugs and current natural bioactive molecules

Compounds

Plant sources

Antiviral Activities

Assays

IC50/Binding Affinity*

Refs.

Phillyrin (KD-1)

Forsythia suspensa

SARS-CoV-2 and HCoV-229E

In vitro using cytopathic effect and plaque reduction assay in Vero E6 cells

IC50 against SARS-CoV-2 and HCoV-229E is 63.90 and 64.53 mg/mL

[256]

Phillyrin (KD-1)

Forsythia suspensa

SARS-CoV-2 and HCoV-229E

In vitro based on pro-inflammatory cytokine expression levels in Huh-7 cells by RT-PCR assay

Phillyrin reduced the production of proinflammatory cytokines at mRNA levels and reduced the protein expression of p-NF-κB p65, NF-κB p65, and p-IκBα

[256]

Cannabidiol and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol

Cannabis sativa L. (Chongsam, leaves)

SARS-CoV-2 (βCoV/KOR/ KCDC03/2020)

In vitro using screening assay in Vero cells

IC50 of 7.91 mM and 10.25 mM

[257]

Pelargonidin

 

SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein

In vitro using Spike/ACE2 Inhibitor Screening Assay Kit and using plaque assay in Vero E6 cells

At 50 mM reduces Spike binding to ACE2 by about 40%. Plaque assay reduces virus entry by about 70% at 100 mM

[258]

Juglanin

 

3a-protein channel of SARS-CoV

In vitro using Voltage-clamp experiments on SARS-3a protein

IC50 of 2.3 mM

[259]

Emodin

Genus Rheum and Polygonum

SNE (spike and envelope gene)-3a protein of SARS-CoV

In vitro using Voltage-clamp experiments on SARS-3a protein

IC50 of 20 mM

[249]

Emodin

 

SARS-CoV spike protein

In vitro using luciferase assay

IC50 of 200 mM

[250]

ThE (composed of green tea catechin and epigallocatechin gallate EGCG; total catechins were 85–95% and total EGCG was 65–70%, caffeine < 0.5%)

Product from Mitsui Norin Co. Ltd

SARS-CoV-2

In vivo using clinical trials. Ten patients were treated for 15 days sessions of inhalation plus three capsules per day (total catechin, 840 mg; total EGCG, 595 mg)

Seven of ten patients switched to a negative SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal swab test in a range of 6–13 days

[260]

Curcumin

Hesperidin

Quercetin

hydroxychloroquine

From chemical manufacturers

SARS-CoV-2 from hCoV-19/Egypt/NRC-3/2020 SARS-CoV-2 virus (Accession

Number on GSAID: EPI_ISL_430820)

In vitro using plaque reduction assay in Vero E6 cells

IC50 values: Curcumin 0.44 mM

Hesperidin 13.25 mM

Quercetin 18.2 mM

Hydroxychloroquine 1.72 mM

[194, 261]

Gallocatechin gallate (GCG)

Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG)

Quercetin

From Sigma-Aldrich

Recombinant SARS 3CLpro transformed and expressed in Pichia pastoris GS115 based on GenBank accession no. AY274119

In vitro: proteolytic activity based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) assay

In silico: using Autodock Tools software with a ligand number of 3CLpro is 2ZU5

IC50 of:

GCG = 47 mM

EGCG = quercetin = 73 mM

The binding energy of:

GCG = − 14.1 kcal/mol, EGCG = − 11.7 kcal/mol, quercetin = − 10.2 kcal/mol

SAR: EGCG and CGC have a galloyl moiety at the 3-OH position to interact with the 3CLpro active site pocket

[248]

Myricetin

 

SARS-CoV-2 Mpro

In vitro using a proteolytic assay based on FRET

In silico: using AMBER18 with ligand number of 3CLpro is 6LZE

In vivo: pulmonary inflammation in bleomycin treated mice

IC50 3.684 ± 0.076 μM

The binding free energy is -32.98 kcal/mol

Myrcetin inhibits the infiltration of inflammatory cells and secretion of inflammatory factors in the lung

[262]

Ginkgolic acid (GA) and anacardic acid (AA)

 

SARS-CoV-2 PLpro, SARS-CoV-2 CLpro, isolated SARS2-CoV-2 USA-WA1/2020

In vitro using an enzymatic assay based on fluorometric peptide (FRET) assay. Antiviral determination using plaque reduction assay on Vero-E6 cells

In silico using Autodock Vina with ligand 6m2n and 6WX4

IC50 against PLpro: GA = 16.30 ± 0.64 and AA = 17.08 ± 1.20 mM

IC50 against 3CL pro: GA = 1.79 ± 0.58 and AA = 2.07 ± 0.35 mM

EC50 against SARS-CoV-2: GA = 8.3 ± 0.03 mM and AA = 9.0 ± 2.5 mM

Inhibition at 7.5 mM: GA = 42% and AA = 13%

Binding affinity of GA to 3CLpro and PLpro is -5.3 and -4.9 kcal/mol

[263]

Curcumin, brazilin, and theaflavin-3,3’-digallate

 

SARS-CoV-2 RBD

In vitro using SARS-CoV-2 Surrogate Virus Neutralization Test Kit

% binding with RBD at 0.1 mg/mL = 100 ± 0.2; 100 ± 0.1; and 100 ± 0.1

[34]

Broussochalcone A (BcA); Papyriflavonol A (PA); 3’-(3-methylbut-2-enyl)-3’,4’,7-trihydroxy flavane (tHF); Broussoflavan A (BfA); Kazinol F (KF); Kazinol J (KJ)

Broussonetia papyrifera

SARS CoV-2 Mpro

In silico using AutoDock Vina on SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (6LU7)

Binding affinity (kcal/mol):

BcA =− 8.1

PA =− 7.9

tHF =− 8.2

BfA =− 7.8

KF =− 8.1

KJ =− 8.0

[264]

Kaempferol, quercetin, luteolin-7-glucoside, demethoxycurcumin, naringenin, apigenin-7-glucoside, oleuropein, curcumin, catechin, epicatechin-gallate

From chemical manufacturers

SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro/Mpro and SARS-CoV 3CLpro/Mpro

In silico using

Autodock 4.2 with Lamarckian Genetic Algorithm on Mpro (6LU7 and 2GTB)

These listed compounds were ranked by affinities (ΔG)

[265]

Curcumin

Hesperidin

Quercetin

hydroxychloroquine

From chemical manufacturers

SARS-CoV-2: S spike protein and main protease

In silico using MOE 2019.012 suite with S spike protein (6VW1) and Mpro (6LU7)

Binding score to S protein and Mpro:

Curcumin − 7.02 and − 7.28 kcal/mol

Hesperidin − 7.92 and − 8.37 kcal/mol

Quercetin − 6.48 and − 6.23 kcal/mol

Hydroxychloroquine -6.60 and  − 7.05 kcal/mol

[194]

Gallocatechin gallate (GCG)

Epicatechin gallate (ECG)

Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG)

Catechin gallate (CG)

Epicatechin (EC)

Catechin

Gallocatechin (GC)

Epigallocatechin (EGC)

 

SARS-CoV-2 main protease

In silico using AutoDock Vina with Mpro (6LU7)

Three best binding energies:

GCG − 9.0 kcal/mol

ECG − 8.2 kcal/mol

EGCG − 7.6 kcal/mol

[266, 267]

Rutin

 

SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (6LU7 and 6YNQ)

In silico using Glide module

Docking score: above − 7.0; − 8.7; − 9.16 kcal/mol

[169]–[171]

Calceolarioside B

 

SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (6LU7), Nsp15 endoribonuclease (6VWW), coronavirus fusion protein (6LXT), SARS-CoV-2 spike ectodomain (6VYB)

In silico using Molegro Virtual Docker

MolDock score:

− 191.295

− 164.77

− 141.587

− 153.135

[268]

5-O-D-glucopyranosyl-4'-hydroxy-7-methoxy-4-phenylcoumarin

 

SARS-CoV-2 Nsp15 endoribonuclease (6WXC)

In silico using windows MOE

Binding energy of − 10.1 kcal/mol

[269]

Luteolin 7-O-β-glucopyranoside (cynaroside), acacetin 7-O-β-rutinoside (linarin) and isoacteoside (isoverbascoside)

Amphilophium paniculatum (L.) Kunth (leaves)

SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (7BUY)

In silico using Molecular Operating Environment (MOE) 2019.0102

Energy score of − 9.54, − 8.54, − 8.46 kcal/mol

[270]

Cannabidiol and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol

 

SARS-CoV-2 (6LU7)

In silico using Autodock and Vina

Binding energy in Autodock is − 10.53 and − 10.42 kcal/mol, while in Vina is − 6.43 and − 7.13 kcal/mol

[257]

Cyanidin, malvidin, pelargonidin, peonidin, petunidin

Pimpinella anisum L. (anise)

SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro (6LU7)

In silico using AutoDock Vina

Binding energy: − 8.1; − 8.0; − 8.0; − 7.7; − 7.5 kcal/mol

[271]

Procyanidin b2 and mangiferin

Chincona pubescenc. and from mango tree

SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro (6LU7)

In silico using AutoDock Vina

Binding affinity: -9.4 and -8.5 kcal/mol

[272]

Heptafuhalol A

 

SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (6LU7)

In silico using Vina and Autodock

Average ΔG = − 14.6 kcal/mol

[273]

Oolonghomobisflavan-A

 

SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (6Y2F)

In silico using GROMACS

Binding free energy on MM-PBSA calculation: -256.875 kj/mol

[274]

Epigallocatechin gallate

Green tea

SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (6LU7), NSP15 endoribonuclease (6VWW), free enzyme Mpro (6Y2E), and 2019-nCoV HR2 domain (6LVN), post fusion core of S2 subunit (6LXT), prefusion spike glycoprotein (6VSB), chimeric receptor-binding domain complexed with hACE2 (6VW1)

In silico using AutoDock

Binding energy (kcal/mol):

6LU7 = − 6.99; 6LVN = − 4.90; 6LXT = − 7.57; 6VSB = − 7.26;

6VWW = − 8.38; 6Y2E = − 9.30; 6VW1 = − 8.66

[275]

Theaflavin digallate

 

SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (6LU7)

In silico using GLIDE

Docking score: -10.574 kcal/mol

[167]

Glycyrrhizic acid (GlA) and theaflavin 3,3-digallate (TF3)

 

SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (6LU7) and ACE2 receptor (IR4L)

In silico using AutoDock Vina

Binding energy to 6LU7: GlA = − 9.3 and TF3 = − 10; and with 1R4L: GlA = − 9.6 and TF3 = − 8.3 kcal/mol

[276]

Theaflavin

 

SARS-CoV-2 RBD

In silico using SwissDock

Idock score − 7.95 kcal/mol

[277]

Pedunculagin, tercatain, and castalin

 

SARS-CoV-2 Mpro, catalytic dyad residues: Cys145 and His41 (6Y84)

In silico using MOE 09

S score: − 18.58; − 23.11; and − 14.04

[166]

Hypericin, Amentoflavone, terflavin

Hypericum perforatum L. and Terminalia chebula Retz. or T. catappa L

SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (6LU7)

In silico using AutoDock Vina

Binding energy: − 10.4, − 9.7 and − 9.7 kcal/mol

[164]

Eriodictyol-7-O-rutinoside, narirutin

Flavanone glycoside in lemon and sweet orange

SARS-CoV-2 RdRp protein sequence (YP_009725307.1)

In silico using AutoDock Vina

Binding energy: -9.9 and -9.7 kcal/mol

[164]

Cis-miyabenol C

Foeniculum vulgare Mill. (fennel)

SARS-CoV-2 human transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2: sequence NP_001128571.1)

In silico using AutoDock Vina

Binding energy: -9.4 kcal/mol

[164]

Ellagic acid

Prunica granatum

SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (6LU7)

In silico using AutoDock Vina

Binding affinity and IC: − 8.4 kcal/mol and 0.7 μM

[193]

5,7,3′,4′-tetrahydroxy-2′-(3,3-dimethylallyl) isoflavone

Myricitrin

Methyl rosmarinate

Psorothamnus arborescens

Myrica cerifera

Hyptis atrorubens Poit

SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro (PMDB ID PM0082635)

In silico using MOE

Binding affinities:

− 29.57

− 22.13

− 20.62

[278]

Agathisflavone

 

SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (pdb id: 6LU7)

In silico using AutoDock 4.1

Binding energy: − 8.4 kcal/mol

[173]

Albireodelphin

 

SARS-CoV-2 RdRp (pdb id: 6M71) and spike protein (pdb id: 6VW1)

In silico using AutoDock 4.1

Binding energy: − 9.8 and − 11.2 kcal/mol

[173]

Inophyllum G2

 

SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (pdb id: 6LU7)

In silico using AutoDock Vina

Docking score: − 8.8 kcal/mol

[176]

Daphnorin

 

SARS-CoV-2 viral methyltransferase (nsp16/10 complex, pdb id: 6W4H) and RBD (pdb id: 6M0J)

In silico using AutoDock Vina

Docking scores: − 9.8 and − 8.2 kcal/mol

[176]

Isodispar B and daphnogirin

 

SARS-CoV-2 hACE2 (pdb id: 6VW1)

In silico using AutoDock Vina

Docking score: − 8.0 kcal/mol

[176]

Isorhamnetin-3-O-rutinoside (narcissin)

Salvadora persica L

SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (pdb id: 6LU7)

In silico using AutoDock

Binding energy:− 8.2530 kcal/mol

[279]

Acetoside

(polyherbal formulation

SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (pdb id: 6LU7)

In silico using iGEMDOCK

Binding energy: − 153.06 kcal/mol

[280]

Demethyloleuropein

 

SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (pdb id: 6LU7)

In silico using AutoDock Vina

Binding energy: -8.90 kcal/mol

IC50 prediction: 11.58 μM

[177]

Nuzhenide oleoside

 

SARS-CoV-2 S protein (pdb id: 6LZG)

In silico using AutoDock Vina

Binding energy: − 8.90 kcal/mol. IC50 prediction: 6.44 μM

[177]

Myricitrin

Quercetin-3-O-glucuronide

Phyllanthus amarus

SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (pdb id: 6LU7)

In silico using AutoDock Vina

Binding affinity: − 9.6 kcal/mol, and − 9.4 kcal/mol

[281]

Isorhamnetin-3-O-rutinoside (narcisin)

Salvadora persica

SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (pdb id: 6LU7)

In silico using AutoDock Vina

Docking score: − 8.2530 kcal/mol

[279]

  1. * IC50 (mg/mL and mM): the concentration of particular compound or drug in inhibiting the biological process to half of the maximum. Docking score (kcal/mol): a computational result for particular program and energy to allow in predicting binding free energy and binding affinity, or ranking the complex of ligand and receptor according to specific parameters. Binding affinity (kcal/mol): an expression of the degree of ligand binding with the protein in complex formation. Binding energy (kcal/mol): the energy released due to the bond formation or the interaction of the ligand and protein which is calculated as a sum of all the intermolecular interactions presented in the complex