Skip to main content
  • Note
  • Published:

Phototactic behavior 7: phototactic response of the maize weevil, Sitotroga zeamais motsch (Coleopter: Curculionidae), to light-emitting diodes

Abstract

Phototactic responses of maize weevil, Sitotroga zeamais, adults to five light-emitting diodes (LEDs) were evaluated and compared with the commonly used luring lamp (BLB). Under optimal light conditions, the red LED (625 ± 10 nm) exhibited the highest attraction rate (59.8 %), followed by the yellow LED (590 ± 5 nm, 52.3 %), the infrared LED (730 nm, 51.9 %), the green LED (520 ± 5 nm, 46.7 %), the blue LED (470 ± 10 nm, 45.3 %), the ultraviolet LED (365 nm, 32.7 %), and the BLB (27.3 %). Moreover, the red LED was approximately 2.19 times more attractive than that of the BLB. These results indicate that a red LED trap may be useful to control S. zeamais adults.

Introduction

Stored agriculture products are damaged by more than 1000 species of beetle pests, moths, and mites, resulting in quantitative and qualitative losses (Rajendran 2002; Rajendran and Sriranjini 2008). Stored product insects contribute to contamination of food commodities through the presence of live insects and insect products (chemical excretions, dead insects, and insect body fragments) (Thomas and James 2010). The major insect in stored agriculture products is the maize weevil, Sitotroga zeamais (Dobee 1974). S. zeamais is a common insect of economic importance on maize in warm areas and causes losses in stored grain weight of up to 18.3 % (Adams 1976). Therefore, controlling these insects relies heavily on the use of synthetic insecticides and fumigants, such as methyl bromide and phosphine (Rajendran and Sriranjini 2008). The number of synthetic insecticides for insect control has decreased drastically because of problems with ozone depletion (i.e., methyl bromide), exposure to applicators, and insect resistance (Paul and Zlatko 2000). Thus, there is a growing need for alternative pest control methods for S. zeamais (Hidalgo et al. 1998). Insect light traps have long been used to control stored grain insects, such as Lasioderma serricorne and Plodia interpunctella (Papadopoulou and Buchelos 2002; Sambaraju and Phillips 2008; Jeon et al. 2012). Light-emitting diode (LEDs) traps have been extensively used to control insect pests more recently (Zheng et al. 2014). LEDs have some specific properties, such as small size, low weight, low temperature, sensitivity, high mechanical stability, high reliability, long operating life, and low cost, that makes them attractive (Schubert 2003). These advantages make LEDs a good alternative to synthetic pesticides for insect control (Zheng et al. 2014). Therefore, in this study, the effects of LEDs on attracting S. zeamais under laboratory conditions were investigated and compared with the commonly used BLB.

Materials and methods

Insects

The maize weevil, S. zeamais, adult culture was obtained from the National Academy of Agricultural Science, RDA (Korea). They were reared on rice grain without exposure to any known insecticides in the laboratory in plastic cages (30 × 30 × 20 cm) at 27 ± 1 °C, 65 ± 5 % relative humidity, and a 12 h light/12 h dark photoperiod.

Light sources

The light sources were produced by Kodenshi Auk Co. Ltd (Korea). The types of LEDs used for testing were UV LED (365 nm), blue LED (CL-1W-UBB, 15.0 ± 3.1 lm, 470 ± 10 nm), green LED (CL-1W-UPGB, 45.0 ± 3.5 lm, 520 ± 5 nm), yellow LED (PP592-8L61-AOBI, 40.0 ± 10.0 lm, 590 ± 5 nm), red LED (CL-1W-UBB, 350.0 ± 1.2 lm, 625 ± 10 nm), and IR LED (730 nm). The LED circuit board (70 × 140 mm) consisted of 40 LEDs of each color and was attached to a control circuit board (300 × 150 mm) in a phototactic chamber. The phototactic responses of S. zeamais adults were compared with those to a BLB (315–400 nm, F8T5 BLB: Sankyo-Denki Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), which served as a control.

Test chamber

The Y-maze chamber for analyzing the phototactic responses was designed by Oh and Lee (2011). The Y-maze chamber consisted of an opaque acrylic body (W400 × D400 × L200 mm) and two hyaloid acrylic boards that were placed at both ends of the boundary outside of the light arm on the Y-maze chamber, which was equipped with the light side at a distance of 250 mm (Fig. 1). The insect entrance hole (100 mm in diameter, covered with nylon netting cloth) was created at a point between the light arm and the dark. The experiments were conducted in a chamber kept at 27 ± 1 °C and 65 ± 5 % relative humidity in complete darkness.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Model of Y-maze phototactic chamber designed by Jeon et al. (2012)

Bioassay

The phototactic responses of S. zeamais adults were measured in the Y-maze under different light conditions, such as different wavelengths, luminance intensities, and light durations. The luminance intensities of the LEDs positioned 700 mm from the light source were measured using an illuminometer (LM-322; AS ONE Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan). Thirty S. zeamais adults were collected using a tiny brush and were released into the insect entrance hole of the Y-maze. The numbers of insects in the light and dark zones of the modified Y-maze were determined to evaluate the attraction of the S. zeamais adults to the LEDs. All experiments were repeated at least six times. Attraction rate (%) = (a number of S. zeamais in a rage of 200 mm from light sources/total S. zeamais) × 100.

Statistical analysis

SPSS ver. 18.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) used for the data analysis. The attraction test results were subjected to one-way analysis of variance, and Tukey’s standardized range test was performed to detect significant differences among the mean values at p < 0.05.

Results and discussion

The attraction effects of S. zeamais adults to the LEDs were examined under conditions in which particular wavelengths, light intensities, and light-exposure times were varied in the Y-maze chamber. The phototactic responses of the S. zeamais adults to four visible (blue, green, yellow, and red) LEDs under four luminance intensities (25, 50, 75, and 100 lx) over 24 h are shown in Table 1. The blue (470 ± 10 nm), green (520 ± 5 nm), yellow (590 ± 5 nm), and red (625 ± 10 nm) LEDs were highly attractive to S. zeamais adults at 25 lx (32.6, 33.3, 36.8, and 48.2 %, respectively). Furthermore, the attractive effects of S. zeamais adults using various light-exposure times (12, 24, 36, and 48 h) were further examined by calculating the attractive rate of the S. zeamais adults to the four visible (blue, green, yellow, and red) LEDs, the IR (730 nm) LED, and the UV (365 nm) LED (Table 2). The UV, blue, green, yellow, red, and IR LEDs exhibited the highest attraction rate to S. zeamais adults after 48 h. No significant difference was observed in the percentage of attracted S. zeamais adults as exposure duration was increased above the optimal exposure time. Based on these results, the effects of the six LEDs on attracting the S. zeamais adults were examined under optical conditions and compared with those of the BLB as a positive control (Table 3). Under optimal light conditions, the red LED exhibited the highest attraction rate (59.8 %) to S. zeamais adults, followed by the yellow LED (52.3 %), the IR LED (51.9 %), the green LED (46.7 %), the blue LED (45.3 %), the UV LED (32.7 %), and the BLB (27.3 %). Based on these results under optimal conditions, the red LED was approximately 2.19× more attractive than that of the commonly used BLB. Therefore, the maze weevils were effectively controlled by the red LED and the yellow LED at night time, but not by natural light time. Most insects have two types of photoreceptive organs such as compound eyes and ocelli (Shimoda and Honda 2013). Compound eyes consist of a lot of light-sensitive unit called ommatidia (Shimoda and Honda 2013). Ommatidia include an elongated bunch of photoreceptor cells each of which has specific spectrum sensitivities (Land and Nilsson 2002). The ommatidia are arranged in the hexagonal array in order to cover a broad visual field with certain spatial resolution and to recognize the movement of object (Land and Nilsson 2002). LEDs affect insect behavior in various ways that can be separated into several categories, such as attraction, repulsion, light adaption, circadian rhythms, photoperiodicity, and light toxicity (Meyer-Rochow et al. 2002; Saunders 2012; Kim et al. 2013; Shimoda and Honda 2013; Jeon et al. 2014). However, the physiological mechanism of phototaxis remains unclear (Yang et al. 2003). Previous studies have reported that insect behavioral responses are related to photoreceptor physiology and the visible light wavelengths detectable by insects which are determined by the spectral sensitivities of the photoreceptors (Menzel and Blakers 1976; Menzel and Greggers 1985). The spectral ranges of photoreceptors differ widely between species (Briscoe and Chittka 2001). Katsuki et al. (2012) reported that the sweet potato weevil, Euscepes postfasciatus, is attracted to UV LED. In addition, Jeon et al. (2012) noted that rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae, adults are attracted to blue and green LEDs. Taken together, our results show that light traps equipped with red and yellow LEDs could be helpful for attracting and trapping S. zeamais adults for integrated pest management. However, further studies should be conducted to evaluate the efficacy of these LEDs in a broad range of granary conditions.

Table 1 Attraction rate of S. zeamais adults to light-emitting diodes under various luminance intensities (lx)1
Table 2 Attraction rate of S. zeamais adults to light-emitting diodes at various light-exposure times (h)1
Table 3 Attraction rate of S. zeamais adults to light-emitting diodes under optimal conditions1

References

  • Adams JM (1976) Weight loss caused by development of Sitophilus zeamais (Motsch.) in maize. J Stored Prod Res 12:269–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briscoe AD, Chittka L (2001) The evolution of color vision in insects. Annu Rev Entomol 46:471–510

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dobee P (1974) The laboratory assessment of the inherent susceptibility of maize varieties to postharvest infestation by Sitophilus zeamais Motsch. (Coleoptera, Curculionidae). J Stored Prod Res 10:183–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hidalgo E, Moore D, Patourel GL (1998) The effect of different formulations of Beauveria bassiana on Sitophilus zeamais in stored maize. J Stored Prod Res 34:171–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeon JH, Oh MS, Cho KS, Lee HS (2012) Phototactic response of the rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae Linnaeus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), to light-emitting diodes. J Korean Soc Appl Biol Chem 55:35–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeon JH, Kim MG, Lee HS (2014) Phototactic behavior 4: attractive effects of Trialeurodes vaporariorum adults to light-emitting diodes under laboratory conditions. J Korean Soc Appl Biol Chem 57:197–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsuki M, Omae Y, Okada K, Kamura T, Matsuyama T, Haraguchi D, Kohama T, Miyatake T (2012) Ultraviolet light-emitting diode (UV LED) trap the West Indian sweet potato weevil, Euscepes postfasciatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Appl Entomol Zool 47:285–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim MG, Yang JY, Lee HS (2013) Phototactic behavior: repellent effects of cigarette beetle, Lasioderma serricorne (Coleoptera: Anobiidae), to light-emitting diodes. Appl Biol Chem 56:331–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Land MF, Nilsson DE (2002) Animal eyes. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel R, Blakers M (1976) Colour receptors in the bee eye-morphology and spectral sensitivity. J Comp Physiol A 108:11–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menzel R, Greggers U (1985) Natural phototaxis and its relationship to colour vision in honeybees. J Comp Physiol A 157:311–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Rochow VB, Kashiwagi T, Eguchi E (2002) Selective photoreceptor damage in four species of insects induced by experimental exposures to UV-irradiation. Micron 33:23–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oh MS, Lee HS (2011) Development of phototactic test apparatus equipped with light source for monitoring pests. J Appl Biol Chem 53:248–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulou SCH, Buchelos CTH (2002) Comparison of trapping efficacy for Lasioderma serricorne (F.) adults with electric, pheromone, food attractant and control-adhesive traps. J Stored Prod Res 38:375–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul F, Zlatko K (2000) The effect of grain moisture content and temperature on the efficacy of diatomaceous earths from different geographical locations against stored-product beetles. J Stored Prod Res 36:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajendran S (2002) Postharvest pest losses. In: Pimentel D (ed) Encyclopedia of pest management. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, pp 654–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajendran S, Sriranjini V (2008) Plant products as fumigants for stored-product insect control. J Stored Prod Res 44:126–135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sambaraju KR, Phillips TW (2008) Responses of adult Plodia interpunctella (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) to light and combinations of attractants and light. J Insect Behav 21:422–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders D (2012) Insect photoperiodism: seeing the light. Physiol Entomol 37:207–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert EF (2003) Light-emitting diodes. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimoda M, Honda KI (2013) Insect reactions to light and its applications to pest management. Appl Entomol Zool 48:413–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas WP, James ET (2010) Biorational approaches to managing stored-product insect. Annu Rev Entomol 55:375–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang EC, Lee DW, Wu WY (2003) Action spectra of phototactic responses of the flea beetle, Phyllotreta striolata. Physiol Entomol 28:362–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng LX, Zheng Y, Wu WJ, Fu YG (2014) Field evaluation of different wavelengths light-emitting diodes as attractants for adult Aleurodicus dispersus Russell (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Neotrop Entomol 43:409–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was carried out with the support of “Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development (Project title: Development of integrated pest management techniques using natural products and LEDs in the grain storage, Project No. PJ01004501)” Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hoi-Seon Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, JH., Sung, BK. & Lee, HS. Phototactic behavior 7: phototactic response of the maize weevil, Sitotroga zeamais motsch (Coleopter: Curculionidae), to light-emitting diodes. J Korean Soc Appl Biol Chem 58, 373–376 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13765-015-0056-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13765-015-0056-4

Keywords