Skip to main content
Applied Biological Chemistry
Download PDF

Monitoring polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon concentrations and distributions in rice paddy soils from Gyeonggi-do, Ulsan, and Pohang

Applied Biological Chemistry volume 62, Article number: 18 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are ubiquitous pollutants that are released by incomplete combustion of carbon-containing materials. The top soils of rice paddies were collected from Gyeonggi-do (18 sites), Ulsan (20 sites), and Pohang (19 sites) in Korea to assess the spatial distribution and potential sources of PAHs. The total concentrations of 15 PAHs in the soils were 19.53–672.93, 125.01–3106.27, and 51.94–8106.21 mg/kg in Gyeonggi province, Ulsan, and Pohang, respectively. The concentration of 7 key carcinogenic PAHs were followed the order: Pohang (38.54–4826.63 ng/g) > Ulsan (28.54–1561.39 ng/g) > Gyeonggi province (19.53–206.51 ng/g). Three-ring PAHs were predominant in the soils from Gyeonggi-do while 3–5 ring compounds were abundant in the agricultural soils from the two industrial regions (Ulsan and Pohang). The PAH isomeric diagnostic ratios indicated that PAH contamination in the two cities mainly originated from pyrogenic sources. The principal component analysis indicated that pyrogenic coal burning and residential biomass combustion were major contributors to the soil contamination in the two cities. The transportation of PAHs through the air from industrial complexes and high volume of traffic may influence the PAHs distribution in the soils of the two cities in Korea.

Introduction

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are abundant environmental pollutants produced by various human activities including the incomplete combustion of carbon-containing materials [1]. PAHs are hardly degraded by microorganisms due to their stable aromatic ring structures and some PAHs are known to be carcinogenic and mutagenic [2]. PAHs are easily dispersed and undergo long-range atmospheric transport to remote regions such as the Arctic [3, 4]. Once PAHs are released into the environment, they can be extensively dispersed through the air and water and deposited in the soil. A large quantity of PAHs released into the atmosphere deposits in soil via dry and wet deposition [5, 6].

As a major reservoir of pollutants, the soil system is an important indicator of long-term environmental problems. Because of their persistency and hydrophobicity, PAHs are prone to enrichment in the soil matrix long after being adsorbed by the soil and sediment organic matter [7, 8]. PAHs in soils can be transferred into agricultural products, further threatening human health [9, 10]. Previous studies have shown that 3-ring PAHs are readily absorbed by maize roots but 2- and 4–6 ring PAHs are less likely to be absorbed into the plants [11]. Therefore, studies regarding agricultural soil PAH contamination must be performed to decrease the risk of human exposure and environmental contamination.

Recently, various studies have been published regarding the concentrations, distributions, and sources of PAHs in soils in a wide range of regions throughout the world. PAH contamination of urban soils have been reported in Miami in the USA [12], Esbjerg in Denmark [13], Ulsan in South Korea [5], Shanghai [7], Nanjing [14], and Beijing [15, 16] in China, and Dhanbad in India [17]. To identify the source of PAHs in soils, a wide variety of studies determined the specific isomeric ratios of PAHs [5, 18,19,20]. The ratio of low molecular weight PAHs (LMWPAHs) to those with high molecular weight (HMWPAHs), anthracene/(anthracene + phenanthrene), and fluoranthene/(fluoranthene + pyrene) are commonly used [5, 8, 21, 22].

Emissions of PAHs have greatly increased by the extensive industrialization in Ulsan and Pohang [5, 23, 24]. Contamination with PAHs in the agricultural lands surrounding these areas is highly likely to occur since many are located near roads or adjacent to industrial areas [25, 26]. A previous study showed that the major contributors to PAHs in road dust in Ulsan were emissions from industrial activities and automobile exhaust [24]. However, a limited number of studies have been performed regarding PAHs in agricultural soils in these industrial regions. Therefore, it is essential to monitor continuously the contamination for human safety.

This study aimed to investigate the concentrations and spatial distributions 16 PAHs in rice paddy soils collected from Gyeonggi province (18 sites) and two industrial areas, Ulsan (20 sites) and Pohang (19 sites) in South Korea. Based on the determined PAH concentrations, pollution sources were identified using specific diagnostic ratios of PAHs and principal component analysis (PCA).

Materials and methods

Standards and sample preparation

The 15 major PAHs identified by the EPA include acenphthylene (Acy), acenaphthene (Ace), fluorene (Flu), phenanthrene (Phe), anthracene (Ant), fluoranthene (Flt), pyrene (Pyr), benzo[b]fluoranthene (BbF), benzo[k]fluoranthene (BkF), BaP, indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene (Ind), dibenzo[a,h]anthracene (DahA), and benzo[g,h,i]perlene (BghiP). The mixture of 16 PAHs was purchased from Accustandard (CT, USA). The surrogates including aceaphthene-d10, phenanthrene-d10, chrysene-d10, fluorene-d10, and benzo[a]pyrene-d12 were obtained from Sigma (MO, USA).

Rice paddy soils (0–10 cm) were collected from 18 sites in Gyeonggi province, 20 sites in Ulsan City, and 19 sites in Pohang City, Gyeongsang Province, South Korea. The grid references of the sampling locations from all sites are listed Additional file 1: Table S1. After the overlying vegetation was removed, the soils were sampled at five points and placed into the same plastic bag. In the laboratory, before passing through a 2-mm sieve, each sample was mixed thoroughly and air-dried at room temperature.

The PAH analysis in soil was carried out based on the U.S EPA method. The soil samples (50 g) were added to a flask and 1 mg/L of surrogate (100 µL) was spiked into each sample. After NaCl (10 g) and dichloromethane (100 mL) were added, the samples were shaken for 15 min using a mechanical shaker. After the extracts were filtered and passed through sodium sulfate to remove residual water, they were evaporated using a rotatory evaporator. For clean-up, silica SPE cartridges were used prior to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS) analysis.

Instrumentation

An Agilent 6890 N GC (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) furnished with an Agilent 7683B injector (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and an Agilent 5975 mass selective detector (MSD) was used for PAH analysis. In the GC system, a DB-5MS capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm i.d. × 0.25 μm film thickness) was installed to separate the analytes. The injection volume was 1 µL for each sample using split mode (3:1) at an injector temperature of 300 °C. The transfer line and ion source temperatures were 280 and 200 °C, respectively. The oven temperature was first held at 65 °C for 2 min, increased to 140 °C (held for 10 min) at a rate of 10 °C/min, and finally to 290 °C (held for 9 min) at a rate of 10 °C/min. Helium was used as a carrier gas at a constant flow rate of 1.2 mL/min. Mass spectra were acquired using electron ionization and selective ion monitoring modes. The ion mass conditions used for PAH quantification is shown in Table 1.

Table 1 The ion mass conditions used for PAH quantification
Full size table

Quality control and data analysis

Quantitation was performed using an external standard calibration method (five-point calibration; 0.05, 0.10, 0.25, 0.50, and 0.10 mg/L) and correlation coefficients (R2 ≥  0.999) for the calibration curves. The analytical methods optimized in this experiment were validated for both precision and accuracy. The method detection limits (MDLs) for the PAHs at 10 µg/kg fortification level ranged from 4 to 18 ng/g and limits of quantification (LOQs) ranged from 12 to 52 ng/g. Matrix spike experiments (n = 3) were performed at the 10 µg/kg spiking level and the recovery rates were ranged from 60 to 120% with relative standard deviations (RSDs) ≤ 10% except Phe (128% ± 1%) and Flt (133% ± 6%). MDLs, LOQs, and recoveries for each PAH with RSDs were listed in Additional file 2: Table S2.

The statistical package IBM SPSS 22.0 software for the PCA analysis and SigmaPlot 12.0 for rank sum tests were used to analyze the data [5, 18, 19]. For the PCA analysis, the data were normalized with the sum of Phe, Ant, Flt, Pyr, BaA, Chr, BbF, and BkF. All the data processing was performed using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Inc., Redmond, WA, USA).

Results

Concentrations and spatial distribution of PAHs in rice paddy soils

The concentrations of US EPA priority PAHs (15 PAHs) in rice paddy soils in Gyeonggi province and two industrial areas (Ulsan and Pohang) in Gyeongsang province were determined (Additional file 3: Fig. S1). The distribution and concentration of the 15 PAHs (Σ16 PAHs) and 7 carcinogenic PAHs (Σ7PAHs; BaA, Chr, BbF, BkF, BaP, Ind, and DahA) in the top soils of Gyeonggi province, Ulsan, and Pohang are shown in Fig. 1 and Additional file 4: Table S3. The spatial distribution of the Σ15 PAHs varied and ranged between 19.53 and 672.93 ng/g (mean: 253.13 ng/g; median: 230.36 ng/g) for Gyeonggi province, 125.01–3106.27 ng/g (mean: 810.41 ng/g; median 606.33 ng/g) for Ulsan, and 51.94–8106.21 ng/g (mean: 2383.97 ng/g; median: 1888.84 ng/g) for Pohang. The concentrations of the Σ15 PAHs in Gyeonggi province were statistically different from those found in Ulsan (rank sum test p < 0.001) and Pohang (rank sum test p < 0.001). However, the PAH concentrations in Ulsan were not statistically different from those observed in Pohang (rank sum test p = 0.001).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Concentrations of the Σ16 and Σ7 PAHs in the sample collected from sites in a Gyeonggi province, b Ulsan, and c Pohang

Full size image

The concentrations of the Σ7 PAHs (19.53–206.51 ng/g) among 15 PAHs determined in Gyeonggi province were statistically different from those in observed in Ulsan (28.54–1561.39 ng/g, rank sum test p = 0.012) and Pohang (38.54–4826.63 ng/g, rank sum test p < 0.001). Unlike the Σ15 PAHs, the concentrations of the Σ7 PAHs in the Ulsan soil samples were statistically different from those sampled from Pohang (rank sum test p = 0.004). These results indicated that the soils in Pohang were more contaminated with Σ7 PAHs than those in Ulsan and Gyeonggi province.

PAH profiles in rice paddy soils

The composition profiles of the 16 PAHs in Gyeonggi province, Ulsan, and Pohang are presented in Fig. 2. The 16 PAHs are generally classified into five groups: 2-ring, 3-ring, 4-ring, 5-ring, and 6-ring PAHs, based on the number of aromatic rings. The sequence of the PAHs proportion in rice paddy soils of Gyeonggi province was composed of 3-ring (69.9%)–4-ring (17.7%)–5-ring (12.3%) (Fig. 2a). The paddy soils of Ulsan mainly consisted of 3-ring (60.1%)–4-ring (24.0%)–5-ring (14.9%)–6-ring (1.0%) (Fig. 2b). The paddy soils of Pohang were also primarily composed of 3-ring (37.2%)–4-ring (44.6%)–5-ring (14.8%)–6-ring (3.4%) (Fig. 2c). Phe in 3 ring PAHs was dominant (66%) in the soils from Gyeonggi province, while Phe and Ant in 3-rings and Flt and Pyr in 4-rings were dominant compounds in the soil samples from Ulsan. BaA, Chr, BbF, and BkF were next dominant PAHs in Ulsan soils. Phe, Ant, Flt, Pyr, BaA, Chr, BbF, and BkF were dominant in Pohang soils.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Composition profiles of the 16 PAHs in samples taken from sites in a Gyeonggi province, b Ulsan, and c Pohang

Full size image

Source identification using PAH isomeric ratios

The sources of PAHs can be identified based on their concentrations and patterns in the soil. Ratios of LMW/HMW > 1 suggest that PAH contamination primarily originates from petrogenic sources (hydrocarbons related with petroleum). On the other hand, LMW/HMW ratios of < 1.0 are a result of pyrogenic PAH generation the burning of petroleum, wood, and coal [27]. The ratios of LMW/HMW in Gyeonggi province, Ulsan, and Pohang are shown in Fig. 3. The LMW/HMW ratios in the soils ranged from 0.22 to 18.74 with a mean value of 2.40 for Gyeonggi province, 0.09–10.55 with a mean of 2.48 for Ulsan, and 0.23–1.98 with a mean of 0.50 for Pohang. Except for 5 sites (sites S4, S5, S11, S14, and S18) in Ulsan and two sites (S2 and S11) in Pohang, analysis of most sites indicates that the PAHs in rice paddy soils were pyrogenically derived.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Ratios of low molecular weight PAHs (LMWPAHs)/high molecular weight PAHs (HMWPAHs) in samples taken from sites in Gyeonggi province, Ulsan, and Pohang

Full size image

The ratios of Ant/(Ant + Phe) and Flt/(Flt + Pyr) were determined using the measured PAH concentrations from Ulsan and Pohang soils to identify the pollution source. The diagnostic ratios were not calculated in the soils from Gyeonggi province because Ant, Flt, and Pyr were not detected except Phe. The cross plot of Ant/(Ant + Phe) against Flt/(Flt + Pyr) is shown in Fig. 4. Ratios of Ant/(Ant + Phe) > 0.1 and Flt/(Flt + Pyr) < 0.4 indicate pollution caused by heavy fuel burning. In contrast, ratios of Ant/(Ant + Phe) > 0.1 and Flt/(Flt + Pyr) > 0.5 correspond to a pyrogenic pollution sources originating from grass, wood, or coal combustion. When the Flt/(Flt + Pyr) ratio is between 0.4 and 0.5, petroleum combustion is the most likely pollution source. In this study, the values of Flt/(Flt + Pyr) and Ant/(Ant + Phe) ranged from 0.5 to 0.7 in both cities. These results indicated that pyrogenic sources, including coal/wood/grass combustion, were the main sources of PAH contaminants.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Plot of Ant(Ant + Phe) against Flt/(Flt + Pyr) obtained from the two industrial areas; Ulsan, and Pohang

Full size image

Source identification using PCA

From the individual PAH (Phe, Ant, Flt, Pyr, BaA, Chr, BbF, and BkF) concentrations, PCA was performed to reduce the set of original variables and to extract a small number of potential factors for analysis of the relationship among the observed variables for further investigation of possible PAH sources. Two principal components (PC1 and PC2) were extracted with eigenvalues of > 1, constituting the majority (> 62%) of the total variance in the agricultural soils from the two industrial cities. The loading and score plots are shown in Fig. 5a, b. PC1 accounted for 45% of the total variance with a high load of BbF, Flt, Pyr, and BaA and PC2 accounted for 18% of the variance with a high load of BkF, BbF, Flt, and Pyr.

Fig. 5
figure 5

a Loading plot and b score plot obtained using PC1 and PC2 based on the PCA of the concentrations of 8 PAHs in soils from Ulsan and Pohang

Full size image

Discussions

The concentrations of the Σ15 and Σ7 PAHs showed that the rice paddy soils from both industrial cities were significantly contaminated due to long-term industrial activities and large volumes of traffic compared to Gyeonggi province, which contains a couple of factories with more residential areas. The results presented herein are consistent with previous studies which showed that the PAHs distribution in soils reflected regional disparities derived from economic growth and population density on a continental scale in China [28]. For example, PAH concentrations in soils obtained from eastern China were higher compared to those sampled from western China due to differences in economic growth [29]. On a regional scale in China, the distribution of PAHs is mainly related to the extent of urbanization. It was reported that PAH concentrations in soils declined along an urban–suburban–rural gradient.

The average levels of the ∑15 PAHs obtained in this study were compared with those reported in previous studies from other countries and the values are listed in Additional file 5: Table S4. The levels of PAHs in Gyeonggi province soils (19.53–672.93 ng/g) were lower than those of agricultural areas in other countries. In nine sampling sites out of 18 in the province, 7 carcinogenic PAHs in the agricultural soils were not detected, indicating that the soils were not possibly greatly contaminated with PAHs compared to other cities. The ∑15 PAH concentrations in Ulsan soils (125.01–3106.27 ng/g) were similar to rural areas (21.5–3350 ng/g) in Nanjing, China [14] and agricultural areas (1230–2950 ng/g) in Accra, Ghana [19], but were lower than those (228.6–14,722.1 ng/g) in Tianjin, China [30]. Pohang soils contained higher amount of PAHs (51.94–8106.21 ng/g) than rural area in Nanjing, China [14] and agricultural areas in Accra, Ghana [19], but were lower than those found in Tianjin, China [30]. The agricultural lands in Accra are severely contaminated with PAHs because they are located near roads with heavy traffic. This comparison indicated that Ulsan soils contained moderate PAH contamination compared to other countries (Additional file 5: Table S4). Pohang soils were severely contaminated with PAHs compared to other countries as well as other areas in South Korea due to the massive industrial complexes present in the city.

Gyeonggi province soils contained mostly 3-ring PAHs, but 3–5 ring compounds were dominant in the contaminated soils in the two industrial regions, Ulsan and Pohang, suggesting that the sources of PAHs originated from the long-lasting industrial activities and heavy traffic derived from rapid industrial growth. Because of water solubility, 2-ring PAHs, and to a lesser extent 3-ring PAHs are more available for biological degradation and uptake [31]. On the other hand, due to low water solubility and volatility, 5- or more rings PAHs are primarily in solid state, bound to soils, sediments or air particulate matters [32]. In solid state, they are less available for biological degradation or uptake, causing increase in their persistency in the environment. It is likely that higher ring PAHs in the two city soils were accumulated from the long-term industrial activities.

The PCA results indicated that most sampling sites in Ulsan were contaminated with Ant, Phe, Chr, and BkF while most sites in Pohang were contaminated with Phe, Ant, Flt, Pyr, BaA, Chr, and BbF, associated with the adjacent steel industry complex. This is consistent with reports from previous studies that showed Phe, Ant, Pyr, Flu, BaA, BbF, DahA, BaP, and BkF are involved in the pyrolytic processes used in the steel industry and associated incomplete combustion emissions [33, 34]. It was reported that Flu, Pyr, BaA, BaP and Chr are derived from coal combustion [35], whereas Phe, Ant, Flu and Pyr are generally released from low-temperature pyrogenic processes [36]. In addition to the analysis of PAHs in the paddy soils, various pesticides are also needed to analyze in the paddy soils because sum of organic pollutants increase their toxicities on ecological concerns [37, 38].

In conclusion, the soil samples from Ulsan and Pohang in South Korea showed higher PAH concentrations than those from Gyeonggi province. The province has less industrial activities than two industrial cities. The major sources of the PAHs in Ulsan and Pohang soils might be due to the long-term industrial activities. Based on diagnostic isomeric ratios, the sources of PAHs in the agricultural soils were mainly coal combustion and pyrogenic processes. Considering that various pollutants including PAHs in soils can be mainly derived from particulate matters in atmosphere, contaminants in paddy soil also should be monitored for food safety for residents around the areas.

References

  1. WHO (2010) Who guidelines for indoor air quality: selected pollutants. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  2. IARC (2010) Some non-heterocyclic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and some related exposures. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum 92:765–772

    Google Scholar 

  3. Choi SD, Ghim YS, Lee JY, Kim JY, Kim YP (2012) Factors affecting the level and pattern of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) at Gosan, Korea during a dust period. J Hazard Mater 227–228:79–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Choi SD, Shunthirasingham C, Daly GL, Xiao H, Lei YD, Wania F (2009) Levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in canadian mountain air and soil are controlled by proximity to roads. Environ Pollut 157:3199–3206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kwon HO, Choi SD (2014) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soils from a multi-industrial city, South Korea. Sci Total Environ 470–471:1494–1501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schuster JK, Harner T, Su K, Mihele C, Eng A (2015) First results from the oil sands passive air monitoring network for polycyclic aromatic compounds. Environ Sci Technol 49:2991–2998

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang XT, Miao Y, Zhang Y, Li YC, Wu MH, Yu G (2013) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in urban soils of the megacity Shanghai: occurrence, source apportionment and potential human health risk. Sci Total Environ 447:80–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bergamasco A, Culotta L, De Stefano C, Orecchio S, Sammartano S, Barreca S (2014) Composition, distribution, and sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sediments of the gulf of Milazzo (Mediterranean Sea, Italy). Polycycl Aromat Compd 34:397–424

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gao Y, Hu X, Zhou Z, Zhang W, Wang Y, Sun B (2017) Phytoavailability and mechanism of bound PAH residues in filed contaminated soils. Environ Pollut 222:465–476

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang S, Yao H, Lu Y, Yu X, Wang J, Sun S, Liu M, Li D, Li YF, Zhang D (2017) Uptake and translocation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and heavy metals by maize from soil irrigated with wastewater. Sci Rep 7:12165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Banger K, Toor GS, Chirenje T, Ma L (2010) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in urban soils of different land uses in Miami, Florida. Soil Sediment Contam 19:231–243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Essumang DK, Kowalski K, Sogaard EG (2011) Levels, distribution and source characterization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in topsoils and roadside soils in Esbjerg, Denmark. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 86:438–443

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang C, Wu S, Zhou S, Wang H, Li B, Chen H, Yu Y, Shi Y (2015) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soils from urban to rural areas in Nanjing: concentration, source, spatial distribution, and potential human health risk. Sci Total Environ 527–528:375–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Peng C, Chen W, Liao X, Wang M, Ouyang Z, Jiao W, Bai Y (2011) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in urban soils of Beijing: status, sources, distribution and potential risk. Environ Pollut 159:802–808

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Peng C, Wang M, Chen W (2016) Spatial analysis of PAHs in soils along an urban–suburban–rural gradient: scale effect, distribution patterns, diffusion and influencing factors. Sci Rep 6:37185

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Suman S, Sinha A, Tarafdar A (2016) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) concentration levels, pattern, source identification and soil toxicity assessment in urban traffic soil of Dhanbad, India. Sci Total Environ 545–546:353–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jiang YF, Wang XT, Wang F, Jia Y, Wu MH, Sheng GY, Fu JM (2009) Levels, composition profiles and sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in urban soil of Shanghai, China. Chemosphere 75:1112–1118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tay CK, Biney CA (2013) Levels and sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in selected irrigated urban agricultural soils in Accra, Ghana. Environ Earth Sci 68:1773–1782

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Xiao Y, Tong F, Kuang Y, Chen B (2014) Distribution and source apportionment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in forest soils from urban to rural areas in the pearl river delta of Southern China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 11:2642–2656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Edokpayi JN, Odiyo JO, Popoola OE, Msagati TA (2016) Determination and distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in rivers, sediments and wastewater effluents in Vhembe district, South Africa. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13:387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tobiszewski M, Namieśnik J (2012) PAH diagnostic ratios for the identification of pollution emission sources. Environ Pollut 162:110–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Choi SD (2014) Time trends in the levels and patterns of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in pine bark, litter, and soil after a forest fire. Sci Total Environ 470–471:1441–1449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nguyen TNT, Jung KS, Son JM, Kwon HO, Choi SD (2018) Seasonal variation, phase distribution, and source identification of atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons at a semi-rural site in Ulsan, South Korea. Environ Pollut 236:529–539

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim L, Jeon JW, Son JY, Park MK, Kim CS, Jeon HJ, Nam TH, Kim K, Park BJ, Choi SD, Lee SE (2017) Monitoring and risk assessment of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in agricultural soil from two industrialized areas. Environ Geochem Health 39:279–291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim L, Jeon JW, Son JY, Park MK, Kim CS, Jeon HJ, Nam TH, Kim K, Park BJ, Choi SD, Lee SE (2017) Concentration and distribution of polychlorinated biphenyls in rice paddy soils. Appl Biol Chem 60:191–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Stogiannidis E, Laane R (2015) Source characterization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by using their molecular indices: an overview of possibilities. In: Whitacre DM (ed) Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology. Springer, Cham, pp 49–133

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zheng W, Lichwa J, Yan T (2011) Impact of different land uses on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon contamination in coastal stream sediments. Chemosphere 84:376–382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ma WL, Liu LY, Tian CG, Qi H, Jia HL, Song WW, Li YF (2015) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Chinese surface soil: occurrence and distribution. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:4190–4200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Shao X, Xu Y, Zhang W, Lv J (2015) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) pollution in agricultural soil in Tianjin, China. Soil Sediment Contam 24:343–351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Johnsen AR, Wick LY, Harms H (2005) Principles of microbial PAH-degradation in soil. Environ Pollut 133:71–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Choi H, Harrison R, Komulainen H, Delgado SJM (2010) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. In: WHO guidelines for indoor air quality: selected pollutants. World Health Organization, Copenhagen

  32. Han B, Ding X, Bai Z, Kong S, Guo G (2011) Source analysis of particulate matter associated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in an industrial city in Northeastern China. J Environ Monit 13:2597–2604

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang J, Zhan C, Liu H, Liu T, Yao R, Hu T, Xiao W, Xing X, Xu H, Cao J (2016) Characterization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), iron and black carbon within street dust from a steel industrial city, central China. Aerosol Air Qual Res 16:2452–2461

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wu SP, Yang BY, Wang XH, Yuan CS, Hong HS (2014) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the atmosphere of two subtropical cities in Southeast China: seasonal variation and gas/particle partitioning. Aerosol Air Qual Res 14:1232–1246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Yang B, Xue N, Zhou L, Li F, Cong X, Han B, Li H, Yan Y, Liu B (2012) Risk assessment and sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in agricultural soils of Huanghuai Plain, China. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 84:304–310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sun Z, Liu J, Zhuo S, Chen Y, Zhang Y, Shen H, Yun X, Shen G, Liu W, Zeng EY, Tao S (2017) Occurrence and geographic distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in agricultural soils in Eastern China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:12168–12175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kim JH, Choi SG, Kwon YS, Hong SM, Seo JS (2018) Development of cabbage reference material for multiresidue pesticide analysis. Appl Biol Chem 61:15–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Lee J, Shin Y, Lee J, Lee J, Kim E, Kim JH (2017) Sensitivity enhancement using a microbore column sand pulsed injection in the simultaneous anlaysis of 356 pesticide multiresidue by gas chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Appl Biol Chem 60:385–390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors’ contributions

HJJ, YCK, and SHY carried out sampling and analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soils. LK, HC, TOK, and SEL interpreted results and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Leesun Kim and Hwang-Ju Jeon have equally contributed to this paper as first authors

  2. Hoon Choi, Tae-Oh Kim and Sung-Eun Lee have equally contributed to this paper as corresponding authors

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Korea School of Urban and Environmental Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan, 44919, Republic of Korea

    Leesun Kim

  2. School of Applied Biosciences, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, 41566, Republic of Korea

    Hwang-Ju Jeon, Yong-Chan Kim & Sung-Eun Lee

  3. Department of Bio-Environmental Chemistry, Wonkwang University, Iksan, Republic of Korea

    Seong-Hyun Yang & Hoon Choi

  4. Department of Environmental Engineering, Kumoh National Institute of Technology, Gumi, 39177, Republic of Korea

    Tae-Oh Kim

Authors
  1. Leesun Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hwang-Ju Jeon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yong-Chan Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Seong-Hyun Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hoon Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tae-Oh Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sung-Eun Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sung-Eun Lee.

Additional files

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Grid references of the sampling sites in Korea.

Additional file 2: Table S2.

Method detection limits (MDLs), limits of quantification (LOQs), recoveries with relative standard deviations (RSDs) obtained from each PAH compound at the 100 µg/kg spiking levels using the developed method.

Additional file 3: Figure S1.

Chromatograms of (A) standards of polyaromatic hydrocarbons (1 ppm), (B), Pohang (10th sample site), (C) Ulsan (13th sample site), and (D) Gyeonggi-Do (9th sample site).

Additional file 4: Table S3.

Concentrations of all 16 PAHs and the 7 carcinogenic PAHs from Ulsan, Pohang, and Gyunggi province in Korea.

Additional file 5: Table S4.

The concentration range (mean) of the ∑16 PAHs in soil samples reported in the literature from several other countries.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, L., Jeon, HJ., Kim, YC. et al. Monitoring polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon concentrations and distributions in rice paddy soils from Gyeonggi-do, Ulsan, and Pohang. Appl Biol Chem 62, 18 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13765-019-0423-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13765-019-0423-7

Keywords