Skip to main content
Applied Biological Chemistry
Download PDF

Comparison of antioxidant activity assays in fresh purple waxy corn (Zea mays L.) during grain filling

Applied Biological Chemistry volume 65, Article number: 1 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Purple waxy corn is a good source of antioxidant compounds such as anthocyanins and polyphenols. Promotion of its use requires an appropriate assay to determine antioxidant activity. The aim of this study is to verify compatibility of the antioxidant activity assays by comparing five different assays in daily kernel samples of the fresh purple waxy corn during grain filling. The levels of antioxidants measured by 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl, ferric reducing antioxidant power, and chemiluminescence showed significant positive correlations with the levels measured by the other assays (r = 0.761–0.893; p < 0.01) and with anthocyanin content (r = 0.798–0.924; p < 0.01). Reducing capacity of 2,2ʹ-azinobis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) and total phenolic content also showed significant correlations (r = 0.764; p < 0.01). However, during late grain filling, the levels of antioxidants measured by all methods showed strong correlations with each other (r > 0.699; p < 0.05). The inconsistencies among the measurements are largely dependent on the developmental stage of the corn kernel. The combination of at least two assays is required to ensure reliable antioxidant activity estimates, especially for early grain-filling stages. These results will inform efforts to promote fresh purple corn as a source of antioxidants.

Introduction

Purple corn has attracted attention as a source of antioxidant compounds as well as natural dyes [1,2,3]. These antioxidant compounds, which include phenolics and anthocyanins, are valued for their potential to reduce the risk of a variety of diseases [4, 5] due to their anti-inflammatory [6, 7], anti-cancer [8,9,10], and anti-obesity effects [11,12,13].

Waxy corn is mostly consumed as a fresh vegetable and its production is increasing, especially in Asian countries [14, 15]. The antioxidant qualities of corn are established during grain filling and various studies have evaluated the antioxidant activity of diverse phytochemicals in purple corn kernels. For example, Lopez-Martinez et al. [16] reported that differences in free-radical scavenging and reducing activities in purple corn kernel extracts depend on the unique profile of anthocyanins and other phenolic compounds present in each genotype. The seeds and cobs of purple corn reportedly possess excellent antioxidant properties, which might increase the potential for industrial application of these natural pigments [17]. Hu and Xu observed that black waxy corn contained a high level of anthocyanins and phenolics, together with high antioxidant activity compared with yellow and white corn, which possessed a lower level of anthocyanins, phenolics, and antioxidant activity [14].

Accurate measurement of antioxidant activity is essential to inform the public, medical and nutritional experts, and researchers, about the antioxidant activities of foods. Many foods contain a variety of constituents with the potential for synergistic interactions between antioxidant compounds; however, the separation and individual identification of each antioxidant compound is expensive and inefficient; therefore, many studies assay total antioxidant activity [18, 19]. The methods used to assay antioxidant activity in vitro have been classified into three categories: (i) those involving hydrogen atom transfer reactions (ROOH· + AH → A·); (ii) those involving electron transfer reactions (M (n) + e (from AH) → AH· + M (n–1); and (iii) those with mechanisms involving enzymes, such as superoxide dismutase [19, 20]. Assays involving hydrogen atom transfer reactions include oxygen radical-absorbance capacity, total radical-trapping antioxidant capacity, and the inhibition of oxygen uptake, linoleic acid oxidation, or low-density lipoprotein oxidation. Assays based on electron transfer reactions include the reducing capacity of 2,2ʹ-azinobis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS), ferric-reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), scavenging capacity for 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radicals, copper (II) reduction capacity, and total phenolic content (TPC) as estimated using Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. Assay methods that employ other approaches include measurements of the total oxidant scavenging capacity, the degree of inhibition of the Briggs–Rauscher oscillation reaction, and chemiluminescence (CHE) or electrochemiluminescence. Huang et al. [19] suggested that the use of several methods to analyze in vitro antioxidant activity can cover a broad variety of potential antioxidant mechanisms and thus may help to overcome the contradictory results usually obtained by using different antioxidant assays to analyze the same materials [21].

In the previous report, we showed that ‘Heukjinjuchal’ has the highest level of anthocyanin in kernel among purple cultivars, and it accumulated during grain filling. Since the level of anthocyanin is gradual during the grain filling stage [22, 23], it is an appropriate material to check the consistency of different methods in various levels of anthocyanin contents.

To date, various methods have been applied to measuring the antioxidant activity of corn kernels. However, most of these assays used dry kernels and showed different results among many samples tested and across experiments and laboratories. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of DPPH, FRAP, ABTS, CHE, and TPC assays to estimate antioxidant activities and their correlations in fresh purple corn kernels. We could evaluate the antioxidant activity of ‘Heukjinjuchal’ purple corn kernels using these different methods.

Materials and methods

Sample preparation

Maize (Zea mays) ‘Heukjinjuchal’ is a single-cross hybrid cultivar developed at the National Institute of Crop Science in South Korea [24]. It is one of the dominant cultivars of fresh waxy corn in the South Korean seed market and accumulates anthocyanin in the purple aleurone. Kernels were collected daily starting from 15 days after silking (DAS) to 31 DAS, for a total of 17 sampling time points. Samples were collected from the middle of the cob to reduce the variation in color. Harvested kernels were immediately frozen in liquid N2 and stored at − 80 °C until use. All the following measurements were done within a month from the first sampling time.

Determining the anthocyanin content

The anthocyanin content was measured as previously described [25]. One gram of corn kernel powder was mixed with 0.1 N HCl in methyl alcohol. The mixture was shaken for 30 min in the dark at room temperature and centrifuged at 4500×g for 20 min. The absorbance value of the supernatant was measured at 535 nm with a spectrophotometer (U-3900 Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The standard curve was obtained with 1, 10, and 100 mg g−1 cyanidin-3-glucoside (Extrasynthese, Genay, France) and the values were converted according to the standard curve.

DPPH assay

Kernel extracts of purple corn were assayed using DPPH as described [26]. One gram of kernel powder was extracted with 80% methyl alcohol for 24 h at room temperature with stirring. The extracted solution was then filtered through Whatman No. 42 filter paper. Reaction mixtures were prepared by mixing 2.5 mL DPPH (Sigma Aldrich, MO, USA) solution (0.35 mM DPPH dissolved in 50% EtOH) with 0.2 mL of each extract. The reaction was incubated for 10 min at room temperature and changes in DPPH absorbance at 517 nm were measured with a spectrophotometer (U-3900 Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The amounts were calculated as µmol Trolox equivalents g−1 dry weight based on a standard curve generated with Trolox solution (100–1000 μM).

FRAP assay

The reducing ability of each sample extract was determined using the FRAP assay [14, 26]. Briefly, FRAP reagent (Sigma Aldrich, MO, USA) was prepared by mixing 300 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 3.6), 10 mM 2,4,6-tripyridyls-triazine solution in 40 mM HCl, and 20 mM FeCl3 solution at a ratio of 10:1:1 (v/v/v). The FRAP reagent was freshly prepared and warmed in a water bath to 37 °C prior to use; 0.1 mL of sample extract was mixed with 1.8 mL FRAP reagent and 3.1 mL ultrapure water (high-performance liquid chromatography grade). The reaction mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 30 min prior to measuring the absorption of the mixture at 593 nm. FRAP values were calculated from a FeSO4 standard curve (100–1000 µM) and reported as µmoles Fe (II) g−1 dry sample weight.

ABTS assay

The ABTS assay measures the reduction of the radical cation of ABTS+ and was carried out as previously described, with slight modifications [14, 26]. Briefly, ABTS+ was generated by reacting 7 mM ABTS with 2.45 mM potassium persulfate. The reaction mixture was allowed to stand in the dark at 24 °C for 16–24 h and was then used within 2 days. The ABTS+ solution was diluted with methanol to an absorbance of 0.700 ± 0.050 at 734 nm. All samples were diluted to obtain 20–80% inhibition of blank absorbance; 50 μL of each diluted extract was mixed with 1.9 mL diluted ABTS+ solution. Assays were performed in triplicate and incubated for 6 min at 24 °C prior to measuring the absorbance at 734 nm. Trolox solution (100–1000 μM) was used as a reference standard. The results were expressed as µmol Trolox equivalents g−1 dry weight.

CHE assay

The CHE assay was performed as described by Kim et al. [27]. Briefly, sample extracts (10 µL) were mixed with ARAW-KIT (anti-radical ability of water-soluble substance) from ABCD GmbH (Berlin, Germany). The signal was directly measured using a chemoluminometer (minilum L100, ABCD GmbH, Berlin, Germany) at 37 °C. Ascorbic acid (Sigma Aldrich, MO, USA) was used to make the antioxidant activity standard curve. The values were further converted to ascorbic acid equivalents.

Measurement of total polyphenol contents (TPC)

Quantitative analysis of TPC was performed using the Folin–Dennis colorimetric method [28]. Briefly, sample extracts (0.5 mL) were mixed with 5 mL distilled water and 5 mL Folin–Ciocalteu phenol reagent in screw-top flasks. After 3 min, 2 mL 10% sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) was added and the mixtures were stirred in a shaker chamber at 30 °C for 1 h. Absorbance of the solutions was measured at 760 nm. A standard curve was obtained using 1–100 ppm gallic acid (Sigma Aldrich, MO, USA) and the results were expressed as µg gallic acid equivalents g−1 dry weight.

Statistical analysis

The antioxidant activities from the five different assays for 51 samples (3 biological replicates from different ears × 17 time points) were used for principal component analysis (PCA). Auto-scaling and PCA were conducted using MetaboAnalyst 5.0 (https://www.metaboanalyst.ca) [29]. The data obtained from these assays were also analyzed using Excel (Microsoft Office 2016, WA, USA) and SAS software version 9.3 for Windows (SAS Institute Inc., NC, USA). Pearson’s correlation was used to compare the measurements of assay methods for purple corn during early grain filling.

Results and discussion

Measuring the anthocyanin content

Anthocyanin purple pigments accumulated during grain filling and were first observed at 16 DAS in the middle of a cob; the cobs were fully colored at 30 DAS (Fig. 1A). When anthocyanins were measured using spectrophotometry, the amount continuously increased and reached a maximum of 2.44 mg g−1 fresh weight at 30 DAS (Fig. 1B, Additional file 1: Table S1). The increasing accumulation of anthocyanins was sufficient for correlation analysis, although the amount was larger than that reported previously [16, 30]. A more precise quantification of anthocyanins using HPLC would be necessary to improve the correlation. Due to the gradual accumulation of anthocyanins, daily samples represent a good source material for investigating correlations among measurements from different antioxidant activity assays.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Purple waxy corn samples used for the analysis and their anthocyanin contents. A ‘Heukjinjuchal’ cobs harvested at 15 to 31 days after silking (DAS). B Amount of total anthocyanins measured by colorimetric methods during grain filling. Values are means from three biological replicates and error bars represent the SD of three biological replicates

Full size image

Overview of the sample characteristics based on principal component analysis

The two components, PC1 and PC2, covered 85% of the total variation among samples (Fig. 2A). The all five antioxidant values were positively loaded to PC1 with the highest loading of FRAP. CHE and DPPH were positively and consistently loaded to PC2 whereas, TPC and ABTS showed negative loading to PC2 (Fig. 2B). The samples were well arranged according to the DAS. The 23–28 DAS samples were clustered together in the middle of the score plot. Three replicates at the same DAS were closely located, where the 20 DAS samples showed relatively high variation among biological replicates (Fig. 2A).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Principal component analysis of the corn kernel samples during seed maturation based on the five different antioxidant activity measurements. A Score plot showing gradual arrangement of samples according to their days after silking (DAS). B Loading plot of five different antioxidant measuring assays for PC1 and PC2

Full size image

Measuring antioxidant activity with five different assays

The antioxidant activity of extracts of ‘Heukjinjuchal’ purple corn kernels was evaluated during the grain filling period using five different assays. Radical scavenging activity by DPPH tended to increase during grain filling and ranged from 6.45 to 12.90%. The value was lowest at 20 DAS and reached its highest level at 30 DAS. The FRAP assay showed the largest variation among samples, with high standard error among biological replicates.

The ABTS assay reflects the ability to reduce the stable radical ABTS+, relative to the activity of the antioxidant standard, Trolox [31]. The ABTS activity was the highest at 15 DAS and then decreased until 22 DAS when it reached the lowest value. The ABTS activity subsequently increased until 31 DAS, when it reached its second highest value (Fig. 3, Additional file 1: Table S1). The ABTS assay was developed by Miller et al. [32] and its operational simplicity led to its wide adoption for measuring antioxidant activity [19].

Fig. 3
figure 3

Values for FRAP, ABTS, CHE, DPPH, and TPC during grain filling in purple corn ‘Heukjinjuchal’ kernels. Values are means from three biological replicates and error bars represent the SD of three biological replicates

Full size image

Chemiluminescence (CHE) is measurement of the emission light that results from a chemical reaction [33]. The antioxidant activity estimated by the CHE assay generally increased during grain filling: the lowest and the highest values were observed at 16 and 30 DAS, respectively (Fig. 3, Additional file 1: Table S1). The increase at the late grain-filling stages is thought to relate to the increase in anthocyanin content with reduced moisture content in the corn kernel.

The use of the TPC assay to measure the reducing activity of sample extracts reportedly produced a linear correlation between antioxidant activity and the phenolic compound contents [14, 26, 30, 34]. However, information concerning the change in TPC assay signal from fresh corn kernels during grain filling is limited. The TPC was highest at 15 DAS and lowest at 22 DAS (Fig. 3, Additional file 1: Table S1).

A variety of assay methods have been used to determine antioxidant activity and the use of more than one assay has been recommended, as these may produce inconsistent results [19, 20]. The FRAP, CHE, and DPPH values showed a similar pattern during grain filling, fluctuating between 17 and 27 DAS, increasing from 27 to 30 DAS, and reaching a maximum at 30 DAS. The anthocyanin content also increased at 27–30 DAS, but did not fluctuate at the earlier time points.

Although ABTS, DPPH, and FRAP are electron transfer-based assays, they produced different results in this study. Xu et al. [34] reported that antioxidant activity measured by DPPH, FRAP, and TPC decreased during grain filling and maturation in yellow corn kernels from their 12-day interval samples, whereas the increase in antioxidant activity in this study was likely due to anthocyanin accumulation.

Comparisons among five antioxidant assays

We next investigated correlations among the antioxidant levels as measured by the different assays to find an appropriate combination of methods for analyzing the antioxidant activity of fresh purple corn samples. The correlations among the measurements generated by the five different antioxidant assays and the anthocyanin content of purple corn kernels are shown in Table 1. The differences among the antioxidant levels often showed weak or no correlations. Nevertheless, highly significant correlations were identified between DPPH and FRAP, DPPH and CHE, FRAP and CHE, and ABTS and TPC levels (r = 0.828***, 0.893***, 0.761***, and 0.764***, respectively; Table 1). The levels of DPPH, FRAP, and CHE were strongly correlated and showed similar patterns to that of anthocyanin accumulation.

Table 1 Correlation analysis between FRAP, ABTS, CHE, DPPH, and TPC levels during grain filling (15–31 DAS) in purple corn kernels
Full size table

Notably, significant correlations were observed among the antioxidants measured by the five assay methods after 22 DAS (r = 0.699* − 0.961***; Table 2). The correlations between DPPH and FRAP, DPPH and CHE, FRAP and CHE, and ABTS and TPC levels at 22–31 DAS were higher than those at 15–31 DAS. This suggests that corn kernels undergo huge physicochemical changes during early grain filling, which leads to inconsistencies among the levels of antioxidants measured.

Table 2 Correlation analysis between FRAP, ABTS, CHE, DPPH, and TPC levels during late grain filling (22–31 DAS) in purple corn kernels
Full size table

Anthocyanin and phenols are two major antioxidant compounds present in purple corn kernels [14] and antioxidant activity has been shown to relate to phenolic content [35]. Moreover, corn generally shows higher TPC and antioxidant activity than other cereals, such as wheat, oats, and rice [1]. In our purple corn samples, the amount of phenolics remained stable during grain filling, whereas the concentration of anthocyanins continuously increased. The discrepancies among the methods seem to arise from the differences in these two main antioxidant compounds, anthocyanins and phenolics, which accumulate differentially during grain filling. According to the correlation analysis, the levels of DPPH, CHE, FRAP are more correlated with each other and those of ABTS and TPC are less-well correlated. The first three reflect anthocyanin content better than the latter two antioxidants.

Many researchers have reported the antioxidant properties of colored corn [14, 16, 36]. Pozo-Insfran et al. [37] demonstrated that red and blue maize had higher phenolic contents than light-colored maize genotypes. Although several studies have investigated the correlation between antioxidants assayed by different methods, no correlation between TPC and anthocyanin levels has been demonstrated [20, 21, 26, 31]. The differences among the reported antioxidant assay results can be associated with the harvest time and types of plant samples, extraction solvents and methods, structures of the antioxidant compounds, and the ratios between the levels of these compounds [30]. Hu and Xu [14] reported that TPC and total anthocyanin content had different effects on the antioxidant activity of corn during grain maturation. In addition, it is difficult to evaluate the antioxidant activity of purple corn kernels during grain filling using only one assay, because the phytochemical composition of the sample varies greatly at different growth stages. Therefore, combinations of antioxidant activity assays are required to precisely estimate the antioxidant activities in purple corn kernels during grain filling. The combination of at least two assays, one from DPPH, CHE, and FRAP, and the other from ABTS and TPC are recommended for precise antioxidant activity measurement according to the correlations among the five assays we found in this study. Furthermore, additional studies with different genotypes are necessary to make conclusions concerning the use of such combinations.

References

  1. Adom KK, Liu RH (2002) Antioxidant activity of grains. J Agric Food Chem 50:6182–6187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chatham LA, Paulsmeyer M, Juvik JA (2019) Prospects for economical natural colorants: insights from maize. Theor Appl Genet 132:2927–2946

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Loarca-Piña G, Neri M, Figueroa JD, Castaño-Tostado E, Ramos-Gómez M, Reynoso R et al (2019) Chemical characterization, antioxidant and antimutagenic evaluations of pigmented corn. J Food Sci Technol 56:3177–3184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen Z, Zhang R, Shi W, Li L, Liu H, Liu Z et al (2019) The multifunctional benefits of naturally occurring delphinidin and its glycosides. J Agric Food Chem 67:11288–11306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kähkönen MP, Heinonen M (2003) Antioxidant activity of anthocyanins and their aglycons. J Agric Food Chem 51:628–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tsuda T, Horio F, Osawa T (2002) Cyanidin 3-O-β-d-glucoside suppresses nitric oxide production during a zymosan treatment in rats. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol 48:305–310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Venancio VP, Cipriano PA, Kim H, Antunes LMG, Talcott ST, Mertens-Talcott SU (2017) Cocoplum (Chrysobalanus icaco L.) anthocyanins exert anti-inflammatory activity in human colon cancer and non-malignant colon cells. Food Funct 8:307–314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen J, Zhu Y, Zhang W, Peng X, Zhou J, Li F et al (2018) Delphinidin induced protective autophagy via mTOR pathway suppression and AMPK pathway activation in HER-2 positive breast cancer cells. BMC Cancer 18:342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hagiwara A, Miyashita K, Nakanishi T, Sano M, Tamano S, Kadota T et al (2001) Pronounced inhibition by a natural anthocyanin, purple corn color, of 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo [4, 5-b] pyridine (PhIP)-associated colorectal carcinogenesis in male F344 rats pretreated with 1, 2-dimethylhydrazine. Cancer Lett 171:17–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jeong MH, Ko H, Jeon H, Sung GJ, Park SY, Jun WJ et al (2016) Delphinidin induces apoptosis via cleaved HDAC3-mediated p53 acetylation and oligomerization in prostate cancer cells. Oncotarget 7:56767–56780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fruebis J, Tsao T-S, Javorschi S, Ebbets-Reed D, Erickson MRS, Yen FT et al (2001) Proteolytic cleavage product of 30-kDa adipocyte complement-related protein increases fatty acid oxidation in muscle and causes weight loss in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:2005–2010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Parra-Vargas M, Sandoval-Rodriguez A, Rodriguez-Echevarria R, Dominguez-Rosales JA, Santos-Garcia A, Armendariz-Borunda J (2018) Delphinidin ameliorates hepatic triglyceride accumulation in human HepG2 cells, but not in diet-induced obese mice. Nutrients 10:1060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tsuda T, Ueno Y, Aoki H, Koda T, Horio F, Takahashi N et al (2004) Anthocyanin enhances adipocytokine secretion and adipocyte-specific gene expression in isolated rat adipocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 316:149–157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hu QP, Xu JG (2011) Profiles of carotenoids, anthocyanins, phenolics, and antioxidant activity of selected color waxy corn grains during maturation. J Agric Food Chem 59:2026–2033

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lim S, Yi G (2019) Investigating seed mineral composition in Korean landrace maize (Zea mays L.) and its kernel texture specificity. J Integr Agric 18:1996–2005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lopez-Martinez LX, Oliart-Ros RM, Valerio-Alfaro G, Lee CH, Parkin KL, Garcia HS (2009) Antioxidant activity, phenolic compounds and anthocyanins content of eighteen strains of Mexican maize. LWT Food Sci Technol 42:1187–1192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang Z, Zhai W (2010) Identification and antioxidant activity of anthocyanins extracted from the seed and cob of purple corn (Zea mays L.). Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 11:169–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bae HH, Yi G, Go YS, Ha JY, Choi YC, Son JH et al (2021) Measuring antioxidant activity in yellow corn (Zea mays L.) inbreds from three different geographic regions. Appl Biol Chem 64:56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Huang D, Ou B, Prior RL (2005) The chemistry behind antioxidant capacity assays. J Agric Food Chem 53:1841–1856

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Dudonné S, Vitrac X, Coutiere P, Woillez M, Mérillon JM (2009) Comparative study of antioxidant properties and total phenolic content of 30 plant extracts of industrial interest using DPPH, ABTS, FRAP, SOD, and ORAC assays. J Agric Food Chem 57:1768–1774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Frankel EN, Meyer AS (2000) The problems of using one-dimensional methods to evaluate multifunctional food and biological antioxidants. J Sci Food Agric 80:1925–1941

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim JT, Yi G, Chung IM, Son BY, Bae HH, Go YS et al (2020) Timing and pattern of anthocyanin accumulation during grain filling in purple waxy corn (Zea mays L.) suggest optimal harvest dates. ACS Omega 5:15702–15708

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim JT, Yi G, Kim MJ, Son BY, Bae HH, Go YS et al (2020) Glycolysis stimulation and storage protein accumulation are hallmarks of maize (Zea mays L.) grain filling. Appl Biol Chem 63:54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jung TW, Song S, Son BY, Kim JT, Baek SB, Kim CK et al (2009) A black waxy hybrid corn, “Heukjinjuchal” with good eating quality. Korean J Breed Sci 41:599–602

    Google Scholar 

  25. Abdel-Aal E-SM, Hucl P (1999) A rapid method for quantifying total anthocyanins in blue aleurone and purple pericarp wheats. Cereal Chem 76:35–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim JT, Chung IM, Son BY, Lee JS, Kim SL, Baek SB et al (2014) Comparison of the antioxidant activity of maysin (C-Glycosylflavone) and other flavonoids. Asian J Chem 26:2931–2934. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2014.16074

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim HB, Kim JB, Seok YS, Seo SD, Kim SL, Sung GB (2012) The effect of citric acid and enzyme inactivation treatment on C3G stability and antioxidant capacity of mulberry fruit jam. J Sericult Entomol Sci 50:82–86. https://doi.org/10.7852/jses.2012.50.2.82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Horwitz W (1980) Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. AOAC, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pang Z, Chong J, Zhou G, de Lima Morais DA, Chang L, Barrette M et al (2021) MetaboAnalyst 5.0: narrowing the gap between raw spectra and functional insights. Nucleic Acids Res 49:W388–W396

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Žilić S, Serpen A, Akıllıoğlu G, Gökmen V, Vančetović J (2012) Phenolic compounds, carotenoids, anthocyanins, and antioxidant capacity of colored maize (Zea mays L.) kernels. J Agric Food Chem 60:1224–1231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Buenger J, Ackermann H, Jentzsch A, Mehling A, Pfitzner I, Reiffen KA et al (2006) An interlaboratory comparison of methods used to assess antioxidant potentials. Int J Cosmet Sci 28:135–146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Miller NJ, Rice-Evans C, Davies MJ, Gopinathan V, Milner A (1993) A novel method for measuring antioxidant capacity and its application to monitoring the antioxidant status in premature neonates. Clin Sci 84:407–412

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Popov I, Lewin G (2008) Handbook of chemiluminescent methods in oxidative stress assessment. Research Signpost, Trivandrum

    Google Scholar 

  34. Xu JG, Hu QP, Wang XD, Luo JY, Liu Y, Tian CR (2010) Changes in the main nutrients, phytochemicals, and antioxidant activity in yellow corn grain during maturation. J Agric Food Chem 58:5751–5756

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Wong CC, Li HB, Cheng KW, Chen F (2006) A systematic survey of antioxidant activity of 30 Chinese medicinal plants using the ferric reducing antioxidant power assay. Food Chem 97:705–711

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. González-Muñoz A, Quesille-Villalobos AM, Fuentealba C, Shetty K, Ranilla LG (2013) Potential of Chilean native corn (Zea mays L.) accessions as natural sources of phenolic antioxidants and in vitro bioactivity for hyperglycemia and hypertension management. J Agric Food Chem 61:10995–11007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pozo-Insfran DD, Serna Saldivar SO, Brenes CH, Talcott ST (2007) Polyphenolics and antioxidant capacity of white and blue corns processed into tortillas and chips. Cereal Chem 84:162–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was carried out with the support of the ‘Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development in Rural Development Administration (Project No. PJ01249702)’, Republic of Korea, and formed part of the Ph.D. thesis of Jung-Tae Kim, entitled ‘Analysis of physicochemical characteristics, antioxidants, anthocyanins and proteome during the ripening stage on purple corn (Zea mays L.) ‘Heukjinjuchal’’.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Jung-Tae Kim and Ill-Min Chung contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. R&D Coordination Division, RDA, Jeonju, 54875, Republic of Korea

    Jung-Tae Kim & Jin-Seok Lee

  2. Department of Crop Science, Sanghuh College of Life Sciences, Konkuk University, Seoul, 05029, Republic of Korea

    Ill-Min Chung & Seung-Hyun Kim

  3. Department of Central Area Crop Science, National Institute of Crop Science, RDA, Suwon, 16429, Republic of Korea

    Mi-Jung Kim, Beom-Young Son, Hwan-Hee Bae, Young Sam Go, Sun-Lim Kim & Seong-Bum Baek

  4. Department of Bio-Environmental Chemistry, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University, Daejoen, 34134, Republic of Korea

    Gibum Yi

Authors
  1. Jung-Tae Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ill-Min Chung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mi-Jung Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jin-Seok Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Beom-Young Son
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hwan-Hee Bae
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Young Sam Go
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Sun-Lim Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Seong-Bum Baek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Seung-Hyun Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Gibum Yi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: JTK, IMC, GY. Material preparation: JTK, IMC, MJK, JSL, BYS, HHB, YSG, SLK, SBB, SHK. Data acquisition and analysis: JTK, MJK, SHK. Data curation: JTK, GY. Writing original draft: JTK, GY. Review and editing: GY. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gibum Yi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

FRAP, ABTS, CHE, DPPH, TPC, and anthocyanins levels during grain filling (15–31 DAS) in purple corn kernels.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, JT., Chung, IM., Kim, MJ. et al. Comparison of antioxidant activity assays in fresh purple waxy corn (Zea mays L.) during grain filling. Appl Biol Chem 65, 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13765-021-00671-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13765-021-00671-w

Keywords