Skip to main content

Monitoring of an electrically induced signal in melon in relation to different environmental conditions in a smart farm


A smart farm that automatically regulates environmental conditions such as temperature, humidity and nutrient supply will maximize crop production per unit area by using ICT-based technology. To control the environment in a smart greenhouse, plant growth should be monitored in real time. The physiological activity of a plant was monitored by receiving an electrical signal from inside the plant stem which changed when the plant absorbed nutrients and water. In this study, the environmental conditions in different areas of a smart farm were not much different, and growth parameters were not much affected by the environmental conditions of the area. However, a plant induced electrical signal (PIES) was associated with the atmospheric and media temperature and relative humidity although there was time lag of 6 ~ 7 h for the peaks of the PIES and other environmental conditions. Therefore, monitoring a PIES will make it possible to improve the growth environments in smart farms.


The proportion of the global population malnourished due to hunger showed a trend of decreasing from 13.30 to 8.10% from 2002 to 2019 but increased to 9.2 ~ 10.4% after 2020 when the coronavirus pandemic began [11]. Because of an increase in population growth and climate change affecting food production, efforts to increase sustainable food production are required [14]. Declining agricultural populations and agricultural land area can also affect food security and supply. Between 2012 and 2020, the ratio of the domestic farm household population to agricultural land area continued to decrease [16]. The decrease in farmland area and the aging of the farm household population in Korea will require efforts to increase productivity per unit area with less manpower. Therefore, new agricultural technologies will have to be developed to solve the food problem in the future.

To increase production per farmland area and labor, various methods such as hydroponics, plant factories, and container farms with high-density indoor cultivation have been introduced, among which smart greenhouses are a key solution for the optimization of environmental conditions and precision agriculture [3, 13]. Precision agriculture is a system that optimizes production management by collecting information on factors affecting crop cultivation based on information and communications technology (ICT) and minimizing unnecessary agricultural materials [12]. ICT emphasizes long-distance communication including storage, transmission, and manipulation of data by accessing information such as big data, the cloud, and artificial intelligence [28]. Therefore, the collection of various growth-related data of plants is required for precision agriculture.

A smart greenhouse has technology that collects growth and environmental data using ICT, diagnoses the environmental conditions and adjusts the condition using devices such as fans, heaters, and air conditioners suitable for plant growth by sensor monitoring [31]. Therefore, in a smart greenhouse, the manpower can be minimized while the temperature, humidity and supply of nutrients are automatically controlled to an optimal state for plant growth. However, the aging of farm population has difficulty understanding ICT and its equipment, which is the core of precision agriculture. In addition, expensive equipment raises the entry barrier for smart greenhouses [18, 32]. Therefore, decision making on environmental conditions also needs to be controlled automatically without human intervention based on the monitoring of plant bioinformatics.

Methods used to evaluate plant activity during plant growth include measurements of photosynthesis, chlorophyll content and reactive oxygen species, which are destructive and cannot be continuously monitored [8, 17]. To evaluate plant growth in a non-destructive and real-time manner, a plant induced electrical signal (PIES) can be used [23]. Xylem sap flow is also non-destructively measured to understand plant reaction in relation to environmental variables [4]. However, sap flow is only related to water movement and heat should be applied. Because the sap flow measurement was done by the heat balance or dissipation of the moving sap, plant stem can be damaged by the heat and continuous measurement of sap flow is restricted [4, 23]. However, PIES measurement does not introduce heat and reflect both water and nutrient uptake by the plant [23]. Because the PIES is related to the movement of water and nutrients in plant stems indicating the plant physiological activity, monitoring of the PIES can be used to control and optimize the environmental conditions in smart farms. Many researches on smart farm system focused on monitoring and controlling environmental parameters such as temperature, humidity, soil water content and pH to enhance productivity and efficiency in agriculture [19]. However, environmental parameters do not directly reflect plant physiological conditions and precise management of optimum conditions for plant growth can be achieved by monitoring of plant physiological response. Because the PIES measures electrical conductivity inside plant stem which is related to plant physiological activity, smart farm systems such as irrigation, ventilation, heating, cooling and shading can be controlled based on the PIES.

In our previous study, PIES of paprika was shown to be positively correlated with irradiation and temperature and negatively correlated with relative humidity [23]. However, PIES of broccoli was not promptly affected by changes in light and CO2 concentrations because water and nutrient transport was not changed immediately [22]. Under different urea fertilization, the PIES was related to nitrate content in broccoli stem [15]. Although previous research showed that the PIES can be used to monitor plant physiological responses under different environmental conditions, it was monitored for some limited plants including paprika, pepper and broccoli. Therefore, to use PIESs in smart farms, first the PIES data for various plants under various environmental conditions in a smart farm should be collected and interpreted. Melons are an important horticultural crop worldwide and are characterized by high yields in environments that are hot and dry [2, 29]. Especially, Cucurbitaceae including melon and watermelon are sensitive to relative humidity and temperature and melons require sufficient light intensity, which affect productivity [5]. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the PIES of melon and its relevance to environmental and growth factors for possible application to monitoring of bioinformatics in controlling environmental conditions in smart farms.

Materials and methods

Growth conditions of the melons in the smart farm

The experiment was conducted at a greenhouse (330 m2) in Republic of Korea, and the variety of melon (Cucumis melo L.) used was D’Artagnan. Melon seedlings were transplanted at 30 cm spacing on the 5th of July, and the melons were harvested on the 15th of September 2021. As for the growth conditions, the indoor temperature was maintained at 28 ~ 33 ℃ during the day and 18 ~ 22 ℃ at night using a smart environmental controller (Farm morning, Green labs, Korea) [25]. The melons were grown in coir slab (chip:dust ratio of 7:3). Stock nutrient solution contained 60.6 g/L of KNO3, 32.6 g/L of Ca(NO3)2·4H2O, 2 g/L of Fe-EDTA, 15.2 g/L of NH4H2PO4, and 36.9 g/L of MgSO4·7H2O and diluted solution was supplied. Nutrients were supplied based on EC through the nutrient phase (Farm morning, Green labs, Korea), which were 1.5, 1.8, 2.0 and 2.3 dS/m for each growth stage of transplanting, 14 days after transplanting, fruiting and 20 days after fruiting, respectively. Irrigation was controlled to 30% in the early growth period, 20% after the fruiting stage, and 10% at 10 days before harvest based on the amount of drainage. Pesticide was applied three times to control greenhouse whitefly.

Monitoring of environmental conditions in the smart farm

Experimental areas were divided into 3 different areas to evaluate effect of slightly different environmental conditions on plant growth in smart farm. Size of each area was 41.25 m2. In each area, the environmental conditions were monitored using one set of environmental sensors including atmospheric temperature, relative humidity, CO2, photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD), media electrical conductivity (EC), media temperature, and media moisture. As environmental sensors, SH-VT260 (SOHA Tech) was used for the air temperature, relative humidity, and CO2 sensors; TEROS 12 (METER Group) was used for the media temperature, media moisture, and EC. PAR photon flux sensor (Apogee instruments) was installed for monitoring the light intensity. Environmental data were measured every minute and averaged in units of 1 h. Although the environmental data were collected during the growth of the melons, environmental data for some selected period was presented in Figures to match the data with PIES data and growth parameters measured.

Monitoring of the plant induced electrical signal in the melons

Two electrodes with three needles made of stainless steel were inserted into the stem of a melon about 10 cm from the media surface. The electrode was connected to a Juns meter OL (Purumbio), and the electrical resistance was measured and converted into the electrical conductivity of the stem. The electrical conductivity of the plant was denoted as the plant induced electrical signal (PIES) to avoid confusion with soil EC. Three to four plants in each area were monitored for PIES and growth parameters of the plants were investigated. The PIES data were measured every 10 min from August to September and averaged in units of 1 h.

Melon growth investigation

The growth and quality of the melons were investigated in accordance with the manual for agricultural investigation of the Agricultural Science and Technology Research [25]. The growth of the melons was investigated by measuring the stem length, number of leaves, leaf length, leaf width, stem diameter, number of flowers, fruit weight, fruit circumference, fruit length, thickness of pericarp, sugar content, and net formation index (1, excellent; 2, good; 3, average; 4, poor; 5, bad) every 3 ~ 4 days.

Statistical analysis of the data

Statistical analysis of the data was performed using the SPSS software (IBM, USA). The differences among the different areas were examined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Duncan’s multiple range test. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed using XLSTAT.


Monitoring of environmental conditions

The environmental conditions of the different areas in the smart farm were slightly different during the daytime, but the difference was not found during the nighttime. The temperature was the highest in Area 3 and the lowest in Area 2 while the relative humidity was inversely related to temperature and showed the lowest relative humidity in Area 3 (Fig. 1a). The temperature reached its peak after 1 h of the peak PPFD, and the CO2 was the highest when the PPFD reached the highest level indicating that CO2 assimilation was related to the PPFD [22]. The PPFD of Area 3 was missing because of a sensor failure. The PPFD of Area 2 was higher than that of Area 1, and the CO2 concentration was lower in Area 2 (Fig. 1b). However, the lower CO2 concentration in Area 2 than the other areas might be attributed to the position of the area located in the middle of the smart farm. During the experimental period, the melons were irrigated from 5:30 ~ 7:40 am and 1:30 ~ 2:40 pm, and the water content increased when the media was irrigated. The water content and EC were different between the three areas, which might be related to different nutrient and water uptake by the plants in the different slabs. The increase in water content was attributed to the irrigation that decreased the media EC (Fig. 1c). The media temperature showed a similar trend to the atmospheric temperature but reached its peak after about 1 h.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Environmental conditions (a atmospheric temperature, relative humidity, b CO2 concentration, photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD), c electrical conductivity and water content of media) monitored in a melon smart farm

Environmental factors affecting the PIES

The magnitude of the PIES in the different areas was in the order of Area 3 > Area 2 > Area 1 (Fig. 2). Although the PIES showed a diurnal variation with the PPFD and atmospheric temperature, the PIES increased 7 h after the temperature increased indicating that transpiration was retarded. Although there was a time lag between the PIES and environmental conditions, the diurnal pattern of the PIES was similar to the atmospheric temperature, media temperature, and irradiation and showed an opposite pattern to the relative humidity and carbon dioxide. Because the peak time of the PIES occurred 6 ~ 7 h after the peak of the atmospheric temperature, relative humidity, CO2 concentration and PPFD and 5 ~ 6 h after the peak of the media temperature and water content and 2 h after the peak of the media EC, the environmental data were moved back, and stepwise regression was conducted to investigate the environmental factors affecting the PIES.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Plant induced electrical signal (PIES) of melons grown in different areas of a smart farm

According to the stepwise regression, the atmospheric and media temperature was the main driving factor for the PIES variation, and the media EC, water content and relative humidity were also selected as predictors (Table 1). Because the environmental factors were related to the PIES, the PIES could be predicted using the result of the stepwise regression. The predicted PIES was well fitted to the monitored PIES with a coefficient of determination ranging from 0.50 to 0.76 (Fig. 2). The lowest coefficient of determination was found in Area 1, where other factors might affect the PIES in addition to the environmental conditions.

Table 1 Results of the stepwise regression for the PIES

Growth parameters of the melons and their relation to the PIES

Plant growth parameters such as shoot length, number of leaves, leaf length and width, and stem diameter were measured on the 24th, 27th and 31st of August and 3rd of September, which were averaged and used for PCA. The characteristics of the fruit such as the fruit weight, circumference, length, width, thickness of the pericarp, sugar content and net formation were analyzed on the day of the harvest. The growth parameters were not much different among the melons grown in different areas because the environmental factors were not different enough to affect the melon plant growth. Some fruit characteristics such as fruit circumference and width were significantly lower in Area 1, but other factors were not much different (Table 2). Therefore, the overall plant growth and fruit quality were not affected by the slightly different environmental conditions.

Table 2 Growth parameters and yield components of the melons grown in different areas in the smart farm

PCA was performed with an individual dataset of 10 different plants from three different areas, and the projections of the cases with two principal components were imaged. PC1 and PC2 accounted for 37.4% and 23.1% of the total variation, respectively. Although the melons from different areas did not show a clear separation, the melons from Area 2 were separated from the melons from Areas 1 and 3 (Table 3 and Fig. 3). PC1 was strongly associated with the plant and fruit growth parameters such as shoot length, number of leaves, leaf length and fruit weight while PC2 was related to fruit quality. However, the PIES was not significantly related to the growth parameters (Table 3 and Fig. 3).

Table 3 Principal component loadings and variance explained by the first four principal components
Fig. 3
figure 3

Biplot of the principal component analysis for the growth parameters of melons grown in different areas of a smart farm


The PIES was related to the water and nutrient uptake of the plants because it measured the electrical resistance between the electrodes inserted in the stem which was converted to electrical conductivity [23]. Generally, water and nutrient uptake by plants is related to environmental conditions. When paprika was grown in February and May and monitored, the PIES increased with the increasing atmospheric temperature [23]. However, in this study, there was time lag of 7 h between the PIES and atmospheric temperature increase, which might be attributed to retarded transpiration due to high temperature during the daytime. Xin et al. [33] also reported 1 ~ 3 h time lag between the sap flow of the Common Camellia and the illumination intensity or air temperature. High temperature induces stomatal closure leading to a declined sap flow in Eucalyptus species [9]. Stomatal conductance of banana leaves was the highest before noon, but transpiration reached its peak between 1 and 4 pm, but in summer, the peak of transpiration occurred at 11 am [26]. Therefore, the diurnal variation of a PIES according to the temperature or irradiation can be seasonally different because of high temperature stress in the summer.

Stepwise regression analysis provides information on the environmental conditions affecting the PIES [6]. Although selected parameters for stepwise regression was not consistent in the different areas, some common factors were temperature related factors such as atmospheric and media temperature. Root zone temperature influences the physiological response including ion uptake, root growth, chemical reactions and water and nutrient transport in soil [24]. Relative humidity was also selected as a parameter in the model of Areas 1 and 2. Vu et al. [30] reported that water uptake by rice was influenced by a vapor pressure deficit, but the root zone temperature had no effect. PPFD was not included in the model because it was zero during nighttime, but it was positively related to atmospheric temperature during daytime and indirectly affected PIES because atmospheric temperature began to increase with increase of PPFD [21]. The CO2 was not included because it decreased as the result of the increased PIES rather than the cause of PIES increase. Photosynthesis resulted in CO2 decrease of 7 ~ 10 μmol/mol compared to ambient CO2 baseline during the daytime [7].

Because the physiological response is associated with environmental conditions, abiotic stresses such as salinity and heat lead to abnormal behavior of plants due to physiological damages [10]. Abiotic and biotic stress induced changes in nutrient uptake, which is important factor in diagnosing abnormal metabolism and reduced yield of plant [1]. When a plant was exposed to stress conditions, the PIES did not respond to environmental conditions and could not be predicted by the environmental conditions [22, 23]. In this case, a comparison of the monitored PIES and predicted PIES will help in diagnosing plant stress in smart farms and improving growth conditions for plants in their early stages of stress [23].

PCA is used to find variables associated and relationships among samples and to reduce the dimension [27]. PCA was conducted to evaluate the relationship between the PIES and growth parameters. Although the PIES was not significantly related to the growth parameters of the melons, it was nearly located in the same plane with plant and fruit growth parameters. Environmental conditions such as temperature and PPFD were not much different in each area of the smart farm, which did not affect the plant development, growth and biomass. The difference in plant growth was due to the individual plants rather than the differences in the environmental conditions. In addition, other environmental aspects such as water and nutrient supply would also be critical in the interpretation of plant responses and thus, should be considered together with the interactions of environmental factors [20].

Nevertheless, relative growth was not good for melons grown in Area 1 according to PCA, which can be related to lower PIES among plants from three different areas. Although the PIES was not directly related to the growth parameters of the melons, the PIES reflects the plant response in relation to complex environmental conditions including the temperature, relative humidity, media water content and CO2 concentrations, and the monitoring of the PIES can be used to control growth conditions in smart farms. However, for precise management of smart farm using the PIES, PIES data should be collected for various plants. Time lag between the peaks for PIES and environmental conditions, which was not shown in plants grown in winter, can be different for other plants and should be tested for other plants grown in summer. In addition, to clarify the relationship between the PIES and plant growth parameters, the PIES and plant growth parameters should be investigated under well controlled different environmental conditions.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the first author, [J.H. Park], upon reasonable request.


  1. Alam SM (1999) Nutrient uptake by plants under stress conditions. In: Pessarakli M (ed) Handbook of plant and crop stress. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 285–313

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aldoshin, N., Mamatov, F., Ismailov, I., & Ergashov, G. (2020). Development of combined tillage tool for melon cultivation. In 19th international scientific conference engineering for rural development Proceedings, Jelgava (Vol. 20, No. 22.05)

  3. Al-Kodmany K (2018) The vertical farm: A review of developments and implications for the vertical city. Buildings 8(2):24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baek S, Jeon E, Park KS, Yeo KH, Lee J (2018) Monitoring of water transportation in plant stem with microneedle sap flow sensor. J Microelectromech Syst 27(3):440–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Baudoin W, Nersisyan A, Shamilov A, Hodder A, Gutierrez D, Pascale SD, Nicola S, Gruda N, Urban L, Tanny J (2017) Good Agricultural Practices for greenhouse vegetable production in the South East European countries-Principles for sustainable intensification of smallholder farms. FAO, Rome, pp 1–449

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bergante S, Facciotto G, Minotta G (2010) Identification of the main site factors and management intensity affecting the establishment of Short-Rotation-Coppices (SRC) in Northern Italy through stepwise regression analysis. Open Life Sci 5(4):522–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Buchmann N, Guehl JM, Barigah TS, Ehleringer JR (1997) Interseasonal comparison of CO2 concentrations, isotopic composition, and carbon dynamics in an Amazonian rainforest (French Guiana). Oecologia 110(1):120–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cha SJ, Park HJ, Kwon SJ, Lee JK, Park JH (2021) Early detection of plant stress using the internal electrical conductivity of Capsicum annuum in response to temperature and salinity stress. Plant Growth Regul 95(3):371–380

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Doronila AI, Forster MA (2015) Performance measurement via sap flow monitoring of three Eucalyptus species for mine site and dryland salinity phytoremediation. Int J Phytorem 17(2):101–108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fahad S, Bajwa AA, Nazir U, Anjum SA, Farooq A, Zohaib A, Huang J (2017) Crop production under drought and heat stress: plant responses and management options. Front Plant Sci.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. FAO, Percentage of undernourished people by region in 2000 and 2020. Accessed 6 Jan 2022

  12. Hakkim VA, Joseph EA, Gokul AA, Mufeedha K (2016) Precision farming the future of Indian agriculture. J Appl Biol Biotechnol. 4(6):0–7

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Karanisa T, Achour Y, Ouammi A, Sayadi S (2022) Smart greenhouses as the path towards precision agriculture in the food-energy and water nexus: case study of Qatar. Env Syst Decisions 42:1–26

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kim MY, Choe YH (2016) Proper irrigation technologies for the establishment of an open-field smart farm—Proper soil water management through sensing and modeling. Magazine Korean Society Agric Eng 58(4):30–37

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kim HN, Yi PH, Park JH (2022) Evaluation of plant-induced electrical signal and growth of Broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica) in response to urea application in soil. Horticult Sci Technol. 30:210–218

    Google Scholar 

  16. KOSIS (2022) Korean Statistical Information Service. Accessed Aug 2022

  17. Krasensky J, Jonak C (2012) Drought, salt, and temperature stress-induced metabolic rearrangements and regulatory networks. J Exp Bot 63(4):1593–1608

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee SG, Cho BH, Park HD (2018) Design of scalable sensor and actuator interface module for smart farm. Int J Smart Home 12(4):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Madushanki AR, Halgamuge MN, Wirasagoda WS, Ali S (2019) Adoption of the Internet of Things (IoT) in agriculture and smart farming towards urban greening: a review. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl. 11:1

    Google Scholar 

  20. Morison JIL, Lawlor DW (2022) Interactions between increasing CO2 concentration and temperature on plant growth. Plant Cell Environ 22(6):659–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nakai H, Yasutake D, Kimura K, Kengo I, Hidaka K, Eguchi T, Hirota T, Okayasu T, Ozaki Y, Kitano M (2022) Dynamics of carbon export from leaves as translocation affected by the coordination of carbohydrate availability in field strawberry. Environ Exp Bot 196:104806

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Park JH, Kim HN (2021) Monitoring of plant induced electrical signal of broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica) under changing light and CO2 conditions. J Appl Biolol Chemis 64(4):351–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Park HJ, Park JH, Park KS, Ahn TI, Son JE (2018) Nondestructive measurement of paprika (Capsicum annuum L.) internal electrical conductivity and its relation to environmental factors. Horticult Sci Technol.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pregitzer KS, King JS (2005) Effects of soil temperature on nutrient uptake. In: Pregitzer KS, King JS (eds) Nutrient acquisition by plants. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 277–310

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. RDA (2012) Manual for agriculture investigation. Suwon, Korea, pp 590–593

  26. Robinson JC, Bower JP (1988) Transpiration from banana leaves in the subtropics in response to diurnal and seasonal factors and high evaporative demand. Sci Hortic 37(1–2):129–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Šamec D, Maretić M, Lugarić I, Mešić A, Salopek-Sondi B, Duralija B (2016) Assessment of the differences in the physical, chemical and phytochemical properties of four strawberry cultivars using principal component analysis. Food Chem 194:828–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shin BH, Jeon HK (2020) ICT-based smart farm design. J Converg Info Technol 10(2):15–20

    Google Scholar 

  29. Silva MA, Albuquerque TG, Alves RC, Oliveira MBP, Costa HS (2020) Melon (Cucumis melo L.) by-products: potential food ingredients for novel functional foods? Trends Food Sci Technol 98:181–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Vu DH, Stuerz S, Asch F (2020) Nutrient uptake and assimilation under varying day and night root zone temperatures in lowland rice. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 183(5):602–614

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Yoon, C., Huh, M., Kang, S. G., Park, J., & Lee, C. (2018, February). Implement smart farm with IoT technology. In 2018 20th International Conference on advanced communication technology (ICACT)) IEEE, pp. 749–752

  32. Yeo UH, Lee IB, Kwon KS, Ha T, Park S, Kim R, Lee S (2016) Analysis of research trend and core technologies based on ICT to materialize smart-farm. Protected Horticult Plant Factory 25(1):30–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Xin X, Zhang W, Li Q (2018) Thermal methods for measuring the sap flow of common camellia. Forest Res Eng Int J 2(2):87–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by the Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture and Forestry(IPET) and Korea Smart Farm R&D Foundation (KosFarm) through the Smart Farm Innovation Technology Development Program, funded by the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs(MAFRA) and Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT), Rural Development Administration (RDA)(421007-04).


This work was supported by the Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture and Forestry(IPET) and Korea Smart Farm R&D Foundation (KosFarm) through the Smart Farm Innovation Technology Development Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



JHP and EJK contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by JHP, GMP, EJK and YMJ. The first draft of the manuscript was written by JHPand EJK commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eun Jeong Kim.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The manuscript does not have potential conflicts of interest. The research does not involve human participants or animals.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, J.H., Park, G.M., Kim, E.J. et al. Monitoring of an electrically induced signal in melon in relation to different environmental conditions in a smart farm. Appl Biol Chem 65, 82 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Plant induced electrical signal
  • Smart farm
  • Melon
  • Growth
  • Environmental condition