Skip to main content
Applied Biological Chemistry
Download PDF

Insights into the abundance, expression and diversity of key denitrification genes in an ecologically managed greenhouse agricultural soil

Applied Biological Chemistry volume 67, Article number: 43 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Understanding the bacteria associated with nitrification and denitrification is crucial for comprehending the processes that lead to nitrous oxide emissions in agricultural greenhouse soils. Therefore, it is important to determine their abundance and expression to gain insight into these processes.

The aim of this study was to explore the bacterial communities associated with denitrification in a greenhouse agricultural soil amended with crop residues and manure for six years. For this purpose, we proceeded to detect and quantify the genes nirK and nirS and the gene nosZ through clone library construction, sequencing, phylogenetic analysis, and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Sequence analysis based on the clone library revealed that many of the nirS or nirK genes detected were not closely related to known denitrifier bacteria, but some of the nosZ sequences were related to the genera such as Pseudomonas, Halomonas, and Marinobacter. Furthermore, the qPCR revealed a high abundance of DNA copies in nirK, 6.08 × 109 ± 1.16 × 109, while nirS and nosZ showed lower values, 9.05 × 106 ± 1.65 × 106 and 8.71 × 106 ± 1.44 × 106, respectively. However, the highest expression rate was observed for nirS (mRNA/DNA ratio = 3.10 × 10− 3), while nirK and nosZ showed 10-fold lower expression rates (4.4 × 10− 4 and 3.5 × 10− 4, respectively). The results of this work provide a preliminary overview of the diversity, abundance and expression of key genes associated with the denitrification process in this type of soil and are a starting point for further studies to understand how this type of soil management can influence the denitrification process.

Introduction

The denitrification process involves the progressive reduction of soluble nitrogen in the form of chemical ions, nitrate (NO3) or nitrite (NO2) to the gases nitric oxide (NO), nitrous oxide (N2O), and molecular nitrogen (N2). In agricultural soils, denitrification is considered to be one of the main sources of nitrogen loss [1], especially in intensive vegetable production systems in greenhouses [2]. This loss of nitrogen not only reduces crop efficiency and profitability but also contributes to global warming, as N2O is considered the third most important greenhouse gas [3, 4].

One of the main approaches to understanding the denitrification process is to study the microbial dynamics involved in this pathway. To this end, one of the most widely employed approaches is based on the analysis of the diversity and abundance of functional genes involved in denitrification. Among the genes involved, nirK, nirS, and nosZ are the gene markers most studied [5,6,7,8]. The reduction of NO2 to NO is carried out by two nonhomologous enzymes named nitrite reductases (NIR), encoded by nirK (Cu-NIR) and nirS (cd1-NIR). Organisms harboring these enzymes often coexist, although in different ratios depending on the environment [9]. In contrast, nitrous oxide reductase (NOS) is the only known enzyme responsible for the reduction of nitrous oxide to N2 and is present in a wide range of soil microorganisms [8].

Studies conducted in agricultural soils in recent years have shown that the abundance and diversity of nirK, nirS, and nosZ are influenced by N fertilizer additions [10], type of fertilization (organic vs. mineral) [1, 11,12,13], management practices (tillage vs. no-till farming) [14], and soil physicochemical properties, particularly pH [15].

Despite these advances, many studies provide results that contradict each other, even for soils with similar characteristics, as shown by Ouyang et al. [9], reflecting that we are still far from understanding all the mechanisms that trigger this process.

In the southern Iberian Peninsula, intensive agriculture is predominant and characterized by the use of agrochemicals, which have contributed to higher productivity but caused a loss of soil quality [16], as well as a loss of biodiversity [17, 18]. To reverse this process, and in order to generate efficient farming systems in which soil biodiversity is not affected, many attempts have been made to replace mineral fertilizers with others based on ecological assumptions, such as the application of crop residues and manure [16, 19, 20]. These studies showed that the application of these organic amendments had a positive effect on several soil quality parameters, but they did not analyze whether these amendments had an effect on the denitrification process.

To address this lack of knowledge, in this study we analyze the denitrification process, through the analysis of the functional genes nirK, nirS and nosZ, in an agricultural soil under greenhouse conditions to which organic amendments based on the application of crop residues and manure have been applied for six years.

Therefore, the main objective of this work was to characterize the abundance and expression of the functional genes nirK, nirS and nosZ, to understand the dynamics related to the denitrification process, as well as to make a first approach to determine the associated bacterial population.

Materials and methods

Soil sampling

Soil sampling was performed on an agricultural soil managed according to the principles of ecological intensification defined by Bommarco et al. [21], Kleijn et al. [22], which consists in maximizing production while reducing environmental impacts by reducing anthropogenic inputs such as inorganic fertilizers and pesticides. In the case of the greenhouse under study, inorganic fertilizers have been replaced by crop residue and manure-based fertilization over the last six years. The greenhouse is located at the Palmerillas Experimental Station (Cajamar Foundation) in the Spanish province of Almería (36º 48’ N; 2’ 3º W longitude and 155 m altitude). Soil samples were collected during the 2020–2021 season, in which the crop in production was eggplant (Solanum melongena L. var. Telma). Three crop lines were randomly selected; within each line, three soil subsamples were collected at a depth of 0–15 cm,  and 15 cm from the center line of randomly selected plants. The subsamples were thoroughly mixed to produce a composite sample. Fifty grams of each composite sample was immediately snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. The samples were stored at -80 °C for DNA/RNA extraction.

Soil properties

The following physicochemical characteristics were analyzed: Soil Moisture (SM), Temperature (T), Electrical Conductivity (EC), Total Organic Carbon (TOC), Total Nitrogen (TN), Carbon to Nitrogen ratio (C: N), and pH.

SM, soil temperature, and electrical conductivity (EC, dSm-1) were measured with a soil sensor (Teros 12, Meter Group), TOC was measured on fine ground soil using the wet oxidation method according to [23], TN was measured with an elemental analyzer ELEMENTAR Rapid N, and finally pH was measured in a 1:5 soil: water suspension (v/v) with a Crison basic 20 pH meter (UNE-ISO 10390:2012).

Nucleic acid extraction

Genomic DNA and total RNA were isolated from 1 g of each soil sample by employing the RNeasy PowerSoil® Total RNA Isolation and RNeasy PowerSoil® DNA Elution Kit (Qiagen®, Valencia, CA), respectively, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Each extraction was carried out in duplicate. Extracted RNA and DNA were quantified using a Nanodrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher Scientific Inc., United States) and stored at -80ºC. The absence of DNA carryovers in the RNA samples was verified by PCR without reverse transcription, and the remaining DNA was removed using NZY DNase I (Nzytech, Portugal). Replicate DNA and RNA samples were pooled. The Applied Biosystems™ High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific Inc., United States) was used to obtain complementary DNA (cDNA) suitable for qPCR analyses. Briefly, 10 µL of RNA was used in a 20 µL reverse transcription reaction using random primers.

Conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

In order to optimize amplification conditions and detect the presence of genes, samples were primarily amplified by conventional PCR. The primers used for amplification and their sequences are listed in Table 1.

Table 1 Primers used in this study. Sequences for each primer, annealing temperature and reference authors are indicated
Full size table

Conventional PCR assays were performed in a SensoQuest LabCycler (Progen Scientific Ltd, Germany) for a final volume of 20 µl, containing 5 µL of 10-fold diluted DNA template, 0.2 µM reverse and forward primers, 0.01% BSA (bovine serum albumin), and 1x DNA Amplitools Master Mix (Biotools, Loganholme, Australia). The PCR program included an initial step at 95 °C, 2 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 60 °C for 30 s (nirK and nirS primers), or at 62 °C for 30 s (nosZ primers), elongation at 72 °C for 45 s, and a final step at 72 °C for 5 min.

Clone libraries, sequencing, and phylogenetics analysis

Clones of the PCR product were obtained using the TOPO® TA Cloning® Kit with pCR™4 vector and transformed into Escherichia coli DH5α™ competent cells. Plasmids were purified with SPEEDTOOLS Plasmid DNA Purification kit (Biotools, Loganholme, Australia). Sequencing was performed in an ABI PRISM 3700 sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) at the Genomics Unit (Universidad Complutense de Madrid).

Sequences were edited and manually aligned using PhyDE® [26] and then compared with those in the GenBank nonredundant nucleotide (nr/nt) database using BLASTN on the NCBI’s homepage (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast). All the sequences were deposited in the GenBank with accession numbers as follows OQ344290-OQ344309 (nirS), OQ360659-OQ360682 (nirK), and OQ344310-OQ344329 (nosZ). The sequences obtained were aligned with the closest matches of the target genes published in the databases.

Phylogenetic analysis of the cloned sequences of each gene was carried out, along with similar sequences retrieved from the GenBank, by a maximum likelihood method using MEGA11 software [27]. The model was selected according to the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). Tree topologies and branch lengths were computed with 500 bootstrap replicates. To estimate the number of groups that could be assigned to different OTUs (operational taxonomic units) within the cloned sequences, we used the assemble species by automatic partitioning (ASAP) method [28]. The method was applied through an online tool (https://bioinfo.mnhn.fr/abi/public/asap, accessed on April 27th, 2023, with default parameters and a p-distance substitution model.

Quantitative PCR

A quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assay was used to quantify the nirK, nirS, and nosZ genes and transcripts using an Applied Biosystems® 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR (ThermoFisher Scientific Inc., United States). The primers used in the qPCR assay were the same as those used in conventional PCR tests.

Purified DNA was diluted 10-fold and cDNA was diluted 3-fold. We used 3 µL of diluted template for DNA quantification and 5 µL of diluted template for cDNA quantification. Reactions were performed with diluted template, 1x Applied Biosystems™ SYBR™ Green PCR Master Mix, 0.2 µM reverse and forward primers, 0.01% BSA, and molecular biology grade water for a final volume of 15 µL. Given that we used a standardized nucleic acid extraction kit, we chose a fixed volume of template rather than a fixed concentration to avoid bias in DNA/RNA quantification. To avoid the influence of inhibitors in our PCR tests, we determined the optimal template concentration.

Thermal cycling conditions for functional genes were as follows: 95 °C for 10 min; 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C (nirK and nirS) or 62 °C (nosZ) for 1 min; and one cycle (melting curve stage) at 95 °C for 15 s.

For each qPCR test, the specificity of the amplification was checked using melting curves. Gene or transcript copy numbers were calculated using standard curves generated from serial 10-fold dilutions of cloned plasmids containing specific gene fragments. Results were expressed as gene copies or transcripts per gram of dry soil. PCR efficiency ranged from 86 to 106% with an R2 value greater than 0.995.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were conducted using the free software R, version 4.2.3 [29]. The primary packages utilized were readxl version 1.3.2 for spreadsheet reading and WRS2 version 1.1-4 for computing the mean and standard deviation of DNA copy numbers and transcripts for each gene, based on three composite samples with two nucleic acid extractions per sample (n = 6). Graphics were generated using the ggplot2 package, version 3.4.1.

Results and discussion

Physicochemical soil properties

The analysis of basic soil properties revealed the following results: the volumetric water content (SM) was 0.137 ± 0.02, the temperature ranged from 17.2 to 18.2, EC was 4.13 ± 2.63 dSm-1, TOC was 30.8 ± 0.42 g kg-1 soil, TN was 9.8 ± 0.23 g kg-1 soil, the C: N ratio was 3.14 ± 0.79, and finally, the pH was 7.9 ± 0.08.

Through exhaustive analyses of different case studies concerning the influence of soil physical properties on the abundance and composition of denitrifying microorganisms [15], and later [9] showed that pH and temperature are determinant aspects of the denitrification process in soils. Specifically, the pH should be slightly alkaline (between 7 and 8) and the temperature should be above 10 ºC (preferably around 25ºC). In addition, they showed that the C: N ratio also influences the presence of this type of microorganisms, with the optimal ratio being around 5.

Sequencing and phylogenetic analysis

Since there have been no previous studies on the diversity of nirK, nirS, and nosZ in the studied soil environment, an initial approach by clone library analysis was performed to investigate the presence of different groups in the denitrifying community prior to a high throughput sequencing study. Twenty-four selected isolates with nirK (nirK-1 to nirK-24), and twenty with nirS (nisS-1 to 20), and nosZ (nosZ-1 to nosZ-20) showed similarity to bacterial sequences of the target genes when compared with the EMBL/GenBank/DDBJ databases. The mean distance calculated using the Tamura 3-parameter model between the clone sequences was 0.36 for nirK, 0.28 for nirS, and 0.26 for nosZ fragments.

According to the best partition score, nirK isolates can be split into 17 OTUs, nirS isolates into 11 OTUs, and nosZ isolates into 13 OTUs at a distance threshold of 0.043, 0.035, and 0.048, respectively.

Phylogenetic analysis of the nirK sequences showed that some of them could not be grouped into clusters with 80% similarity (Fig. 1). Four of the isolated sequences were grouped in one cluster together with known sequences from related genera of Thermomonas, Lysobacter, Pseudoxanthomonas, and Stenotrophomonas. The other sequences obtained do not have a close similarity with bacterial nirK gene sequences deposited in the databases.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree based on nirK sequences and the General Time Reversible model. Bootstrap values higher than 50% are indicated above branches. Colors represent clusters with 80% similarity

Full size image

The majority of amplified nirS denitrifier genes are grouped into a main cluster (Fig. 2). All nirS isolates were related to uncultured bacteria except one sequence associated with the Pseudomonas genus.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree based on nirS sequences and the General Time Reversible model. Bootstrap values higher than 50% are indicated above branches. Colors represent clusters with 80% similarity

Full size image

The nosZ sequences were grouped into three main clusters with 80% similarity within them (Fig. 3). Cluster I comprised uncultured bacteria, Bradyrhizobium oligotrophicum, Thalassobaculum fulvum, Paracoccus sp., Agrobacterium tumefaciens, and Aureimonas sp.; Cluster II was related to the nosZ of the Pseudomonas genus; and cluster III to the Marinobacter and Halomonas genera.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree based on nosZ sequences and the Tamura 3-parameter model. Bootstrap values higher than 50% are indicated above branches. Colors represent clusters with 80% similarity

Full size image

The comparison of sequences with those available in the databases allows us to identify the presence of Alpha- and Gamma-Proteobacteria related to the main denitrifying genera such as Agrobacterium, Pseudomonas, Marinobacter, and Halomonas [15, 30]. However, most of the nirK and nirS clones belong to groups of denitrifying bacteria that have not yet been isolated, similar to that reported in paddy soil by Yoshida et al. [31]. This could be due to the limitations of culture-dependent analysis of denitrifying bacteria present in soils [32].

Although we analyzed a small number of clones, the number of OTUs identified and the structure of the phylogenetic trees suggest that the community of nitrifying bacteria in the soil under study is not simple. In this sense, according to Ouyang et al. [9], to characterize the diversity of functional groups associated with the denitrification process, it is advisable to design clade-specific primers that can cover the existing diversity. Following these recommendations, a more thorough study is underway with the aim of characterizing in depth the composition of the bacterial community associated with the denitrification process.

Abundance and expression of the nirK, nirS, and nosZ genes

Gene copy numbers for nirK, nirS, and nosZ were 6.08 × 109 ± 1.16 × 109, 9.05 × 106 ± 1.65 × 106, and 8.71 × 106 ± 1.44 × 106, respectively (Fig. 4A).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Abundance of the nirK, nirS, and nosZ genes. (A): DNA copies; (B): mRNA transcripts

Full size image

Denitrifying bacteria carrying nirK and nirS often coexist in the soil environment, although nirK and nirS encode non-homologous enzymes (copper-dependent and cytochrome-cd1, respectively). In order to understand the co-occurrence relationships between bacteria harboring nirK and nirS, the ratio between the abundance of these two genes has been analyzed in many studies, showing that the abundance of both genes increases with soil fertilization [9, 13, 33], but nirK seems to be slightly favored by the addition of nitrogen in either mineral or organic form [10] and by the duration of fertilization time [9, 10]. In line with what these authors assert, the use of organic fertilizers for six years in the soil analyzed in the present research could explain the higher abundance of nirK found in this work.

On the other hand, the abundance of nosZ/(nirK + nirS) has been proposed as a metric for indirectly estimating potential N2O emissions to the atmosphere [34]. In this study, the ratio is less than one (1 × 10− 3), indicating a deficiency of nitrous oxide reductase (NOS) activity capable of reducing the N2O produced as a co-product in previous steps of the denitrification process. This fact might suggest that fertilization based on adding crop residues and manure could favor the presence of bacteria with partial denitrifying activity, mainly carrying NIR genes (primarily nirK) as opposed to bacteria carrying NOS genes. However, it should be noted that the diversity of bacteria carrying genes encoding the enzyme nitrous oxide reductase seems to be more complex than previously thought [35], so the number of gene copies reflected in the present work may underestimate the true abundance of this type of bacteria.

In recent years, numerous studies have been conducted to develop primers with the highest possible coverage to detect what has recently been termed the atypical nosZ clade II [36]. Therefore, for future studies, it is advisable to analyze different pairs of nosZ primers capable of collecting the maximum diversity so that we can verify whether what was observed in this study is due to a limitation of the coverage of the selected primers or, on the contrary, to the influence of the type of soil management on the abundance of the different genes.

By analyzing mRNA transcripts, the values for nirK, nirS, and nosZ were 2.70 × 106 ± 8.60 × 105, 2.74 × 104 ± 5.92 × 103, and 3.09 × 103 ± 6.60 × 102, respectively (Fig. 4B).

There is limited research available in the literature on mRNA abundance in environmental samples, mainly due to the difficulty of extracting RNA, the difficulty of designing primers that assemble the existing diversity, and the limitations of correlating gene expression and function, as discussed by Saleh-Lakha et al. [37].

From the few studies on the abundance of RNA transcripts of denitrifying genes, it can be concluded that the expression of nosZ is more dependent on environmental factors than that of nirS and nirK. Henderson et al. (2010) and Németh et al. (2014) [38, 39], showed how nosZ transcripts vary with the addition of crop residues, while nirS transcripts remain nearly unchanged. Similar results were highlighted by Dandie et al. [25], who found greater variation in nosZ transcripts than in nirK or nirS when comparing agricultural soil to riparian soil.

It is not possible to determine whether fertilization management has affected the regulation of gene activity in this study, as the initial situation of the greenhouse soil has not been characterized. However, the detection of mRNA indicates that the genes were actively expressed at the time of sampling.

The use of mRNA/DNA ratios to infer the activity status of environmental bacterial populations is generally accepted, as the difference between mRNA and DNA copies could indicate dead or dormant bacteria [40, 41]. As can be observed in Fig. 5 nirS has the highest mRNA/DNA ratio (3.10 × 10 − 3), while nirK and nosZ showed 10-fold lower expression rates (4.4 × 10 − 4 and 3.5 × 10 − 4, respectively), which may indicate that bacteria carrying the nirS gene had a higher level of transcriptional activity at the time of sample collection. Though, copy numbers of gene transcripts expressed as the ratio of mRNA/DNA for each gene were very low, never exceeding one gene transcript per gene copy.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Ratio of mRNA transcripts / DNA copies by functional gene

Full size image

However, it should be taken into account that expression rates vary not only by soil management type, as mentioned above, but also by seasonality, as pointed out by [14]. Therefore, to better understand the expression activity of the genes involved in the denitrification process, it would be advisable to focus efforts on improving the coverage and specificity of primers designed to amplify denitrifying genes, as suggested by Ouyang et al. [9], Tatti et al. [14], and Luo et al. [33].

The sequencing of nirK, nirS, and nosZ clones allowed us to briefly characterize for the first time the population of denitrifying organisms in an ecologically managed greenhouse soil in the semi-arid southeast of the Iberian Peninsula. Furthermore, this study shows that gene abundance and expression are significantly higher in nirK than in nirS and nosZ. The highest ratio of RNA transcripts/DNA copies occurs in the nirS gene. On the other hand, the low copies found in nosZ (both DNA and mRNA) shows an imbalance with respect to the copies found in nirK, highlighting the need to use different primers that allow us to capture as much diversity as possible. The results shown in this work are relevant as a starting point for more comprehensive studies, based on metagenomics and metatranscriptomics, to understand the dynamics of bacterial composition associated with the denitrification process. Finally, it is also advisable to carry out comparative studies between different types of soil management to verify their influence on the abundance and expression of these genes.

Data availability

All DNA sequences are available in genbank repository with accession numbers as follows OQ344290-OQ344309 (nirS), OQ360659-OQ360682 (nirK), and OQ344310-OQ344329 (nosZ). Additional data used in this study are available from the corresponding author by request.

References

  1. Yin C, Fan F, Song A, Cui P, Li T, Liang Y (2015) Denitrification potential under different fertilization regimes is closely coupled with changes in the denitrifying community in a black soil. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99(13):5719–5729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-6461-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Qasim W, Zhao Y, Wan L, Lv H, Lin S, Gettel GM, Butterbach-Bahl K (2022) The potential importance of soil denitrification as a major N loss pathway in intensive greenhouse vegetable production systems. Plant Soil 471(1–2):157–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-021-05187-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. IPCC (2013) In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Climate Change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, p 1535

    Google Scholar 

  4. U.S. EPA (2023) Overview of greenhouse Gases Environmental Protection Agency. From Natural Sources, W., DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  5. Braker G, Fesefeldt A, Witzel KP (1998) Development of PCR Primer Systems for Amplification of Nitrite Reductase Genes (nirK and nirS) to detect denitrifying Bacteria in environmental samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 64 (10). https://journals.asm.org/journal/aem

  6. Henry S, Baudoin E, López-Gutiérrez JC, Martin-Laurent F, Brauman A, Philippot L (2004) Quantification of denitrifying bacteria in soils by nirK gene targeted real-time PCR. J Microbiol Methods 59(3):327–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2004.07.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Henry S, Bru D, Stres B, Hallet S, Philippot L (2006) Quantitative detection of the nosZ gene, encoding nitrous oxide reductase, and comparison of the abundances of 16S rRNA, narG, nirK, and nosZ genes in soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 72(8):5181–5189. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00231-06

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kuypers MMM, Marchant HK, Kartal B (2018) The microbial nitrogen-cycling network. Nat Rev Microbiol 16(5):263–276. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2018.9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ouyang Y, Evans SE, Friesen ML, Tiemann LK (2018) Effect of nitrogen fertilization on the abundance of nitrogen cycling genes in agricultural soils: a meta-analysis of field studies. Soil Biol Biochem 127:71–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.08.024

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. You L, Ros GH, Chen Y, Yang X, Cui Z, Liu X, Jiang R, Zhang F, de Vries W (2022) Global meta-analysis of terrestrial nitrous oxide emissions and associated functional genes under nitrogen addition. Soil Biol Biochem 165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108523

  11. Maul JE, Cavigelli MA, Vinyard B, Buyer JS (2019) Cropping system history and crop rotation phase drive the abundance of soil denitrification genes nirK, nirS and nosZ in conventional and organic grain agroecosystems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 273:95–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.11.022

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bowen H, Maul JE, Cavigelli MA, Yarwood S (2020) Denitrifier abundance and community composition linked to denitrification activity in an agricultural and wetland soil. Appl Soil Ecol 151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103521

  13. Xiao X, Xie G, Yang Z, He N, Yang D, Liu M (2021) Variation in abundance, diversity, and composition of nirK and nirS containing denitrifying bacterial communities in a red paddy soil as affected by combined organic-chemical fertilization. Appl Soil Ecol 166:104001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.104001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tatti E, Goyer C, Burton DL, Wertz S, Zebarth BJ, Chantigny M, Filion M (2015) Tillage Management and Seasonal effects on Denitrifier Community abundance, Gene expression and structure over Winter. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 70(3):795–808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-015-0591-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ji B, Yang K, Zhu L, Jiang Y, Wang H, Zhou J, Zhang H (2015) Aerobic denitrification: a review of important advances of the last 30 years. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 20(4):643–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-015-0009-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Salinas J, Meca D, del Moral F (2020) Short-term effects of changing Soil Management practices on Soil Quality indicators and Crop yields in Greenhouses. Agron 10(4):582. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10040582

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Marín-Guirao JI, de Cara-García M, Crisol-Martínez E, Gómez-Tenorio MÁ, García-Raya P, Tello-Marquina JC (2019) Association of plant development to organic matter and fungal presence in soils of horticultural crops. Ann Appl Biol 174(3):339–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Aznar-Sánchez JA, Velasco-Muñoz JF, López-Felices B, del Moral-Torres F (2020) Barriers and facilitators for adopting sustainable Soil Management practices in Mediterranean Olive Groves. Agron 10(4):506. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10040506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. del Moral F, González V, Simón M, García I, Sánchez JA, de Haro S (2012) Soil properties after 10 years of organic versus conventional management in two greenhouses in Almeria (SE Spain). Arch Agron Soil Sci 58(1):S226–S231. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2012.698730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. García-Raya P, Ruiz-Olmos C, Marín-Guirao JI, Asensio-Grima C, Tello-Marquina JC, de Cara-García M (2019) Greenhouse soil biosolarization with tomato plant debris as a unique fertilizer for tomato crops. Int J Environ Health Res 16(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16020279

  21. Bommarco R, Vico G, Hallin S (2018) Exploiting ecosystem services in agriculture for increased food security. Glob Food Sect. 17:57–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2018.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kleijn D, Bommarco R, Fijen TPM, Garibaldi LA, Potts SG, van der Putten WH (2019) Ecological intensification: bridging the gap between Science and Practice. Trends Ecol Evol 34:154–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2018.11.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mingorance MD, Barahona E, Fernández-Gálvez J (2007) Guidelines for improving organic carbon recovery by the wet oxidation method. Chemosphere 68(3):409–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.01.021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Khanal A, Lee JH (2020) Functional diversity and abundance of nitrogen cycle-related genes in paddy soil. Appl Biol Chem 63(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13765-020-00500-6

  25. Dandie CE, Burton DL, Zebarth BJ, Henderson SL, Trevors JT, Goyer C (2008) Changes in bacterial denitrifier community abundance over time in an agricultural field and their relationship with denitrification activity. Appl Environ Microbiol 74(19):5997–6005. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00441-08

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Müller K, Quandt D, Müller J, Neinhuis C (2005) PhyDe v0.92: Phylogenetic Data Editorhttp://www.phyde.de

  27. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K (2018) MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 35(6):1547–1549. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Puillandre N, Brouillet S, Achaz G (2021) ASAP: assemble species by automatic partitioning. Mol Ecol Resour 21(2):609–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. R Core Team (2022) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/

  30. Li H, Zhang Y, Wang T, Feng S, Ren Q, Cui Z, Cao C (2019) Responses of soil denitrifying bacterial communities carrying nirS, nirK, and nosZ genes to revegetation of moving sand dunes. Ecol Indic 107:105541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105541

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Yoshida M, Ishii S, Fujii D, Otsuka S, Senoo K (2012) Identification of active denitrifiers in rice paddy soil by DNA- and RNA-based analyses. Microbes Environ 27(4):456–461. https://doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.ME12076

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Lycus P, Bøthun KL, Bergaust L, Shapleigh JP, Bakken LR, Frostegård Å (2017) Phenotypic and genotypic richness of denitrifiers revealed by a novel isolation strategy. ISME J 11(10):2219–2232. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2017.82

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Luo X, Zeng L, Wang L, Qian H, Hou C, Wen S, Wang B, Huang Q, Chen W (2021) Abundance for subgroups of denitrifiers in soil aggregates associates with denitrifying enzyme activities under different fertilization regimes. Appl Soil Ecol 166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.103983

  34. Han H, Chen C, Bai M, Xu T, Yang H, Shi A, Ding G, Chun, Li J (2020) Abundance and diversity of denitrifying bacterial communities associated with N2O emission under long-term organic farming. Eur J Soil Biol 97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2020.103153

  35. Jones C, Graf D, Bru D, Philippot L, Hallin S (2013) The unaccounted yet abundant nitrous oxide-reducing microbial community: a potential nitrous oxide sink. ISME J 7:417–426. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2012.125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Chee-Sanford JC, Connor L, Krichels A, Yang WH, Sanford RA (2020) Hierarchical detection of diverse Clade II (atypical) nosZ genes using new primer sets for classical- and multiplex PCR array applications. J Microbiol Methods 172:105908. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MIMET.2020.105908

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Saleh-Lakha S, Shannon KE, Goyer C, Trevors JT (2011) Challenges in quantifying microbial gene expression in soil using quantitative reverse transcription real-time PCR. J Microbiol Methods 85(3):239–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2011.03.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Henderson SL, Dandie CE, Patten CL, Zebarth BJ, Burton DL, Trevors JT, Goyer C (2010) Changes in denitrifier abundance, denitrification gene mRNA levels, nitrous oxide emissions, and denitrification in anoxic soil microcosms amended with glucose and plant residues. Appl Environ Microbiol 76(7):2155–2164. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02993-09

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Németh DD, Wagner-Riddle C, Dunfield KE (2014) Abundance and gene expression in nitrifier and denitrifier communities associated with a field scale spring thaw N2O flux event. Soil Biol Biochem 73:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.02.007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Steven B, Hesse C, Soghigian J, Gallegos-Graves LV, Dunbar J (2017) Simulated rRNA/DNA ratios show potential to misclassify active populations as dormant. Appl Environ Microbiol 83:11. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00696-17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Fan Z, Zeng W, Wang B, Chang S, Peng S (2019) Analysis of microbial community in a continuous flow process at gene and transcription level to enhance biological nutrients removal from municipal wastewater. Bioresour Technol 286:121374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121374

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has been developed thanks to the grant “María Zambrano” awarded to Rafael Hernández Maqueda (María Zambrano, UAL, Ministry of Universities, Recovery, Transformation, and Resilience Plan funded by the European Union-Next Generation EU).

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Agronomía, Área de Edafología y Química agrícola, Universidad de Almería, Campus of International Agri-Food Excellence ceiA3, Carretera Sacramento, s/n 04120 La Cañada de San Urbano, Almería, Spain

    R. Hernández Maqueda & F. del Moral

  2. Universidad Técnica de Cotopaxi, Av. Simón Rodríguez s/n, Barrio El Ejido, Sector San Felipe, Latacunga, Ecuador

    R. Hernández Maqueda

  3. Departamento de Genética, Fisiología y Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, 28040, Spain

    I. Ballesteros & R. Linacero

  4. Estación Experimental de Cajamar Las Palmerillas, Fundación Cajamar-Grupo Cooperativo Cajamar, 04710 Santa María del Águila, El Ejido, Almería, Spain

    D. Meca

Authors
  1. R. Hernández Maqueda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. I. Ballesteros
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. Meca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R. Linacero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. F. del Moral
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the conceptualization and design of the study. Material preparation and data collection were performed by FM, DM, and RHM; DNA/RNA extraction and the subsequent analysis were carried out by IB, RL, and RHM. The analysis of the physicochemical properties of the soil was performed by FM and DM. The first draft of the manuscript was written by RHM, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Hernández Maqueda.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hernández Maqueda, R., Ballesteros, I., Meca, D. et al. Insights into the abundance, expression and diversity of key denitrification genes in an ecologically managed greenhouse agricultural soil. Appl Biol Chem 67, 43 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13765-024-00901-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13765-024-00901-x

Keywords