Skip to main content
  • Note
  • Published:

Expression, phosphorylation, localization, and microtubule binding of tau in colorectal cell lines

Abstract

Tau is a microtubule-associated protein that causes proper role of neuron by assembling and stabilizing microtubules. The amount and post translational modification of tau can change its function as a stabilizer of microtubules. The aim of the study was to look for the expression of tau in colorectal cancer and normal cells, along with phosphorylation and microtubule binding properties of tau expressed in colorectal cancer cell. Two colorectal cancer cells (SW480 and HCT 116) expressed tau that was also phosphorylated, whereas the others (Caco-2, HT-29 and DLD1) did not. Colorectal normal cell (CCD-18Co) expressed very tiny amount of tau that was not phosphorylated. A big fraction of tau in HCT 116 did not bind to microtubule. The results suggest that some colorectal cancer cells express hyperphosphorylated tau as found in Alzheimer’s disease. So, tau in colorectal cancer cells does not look like same as tau in normal adult brain; rather it works nearly same as tau in neurodegenerative disease.

Introduction

Tau, that is copious in the central nervous system (CNS) and scarce elsewhere, is a heat stable microtubule-associated protein (MAP) and was discovered almost 40 years ago. In CNS, tau has 6 isoforms and controls microtubule assembly and polymerization along with regulate axonal diameter, axonal transport, neuronal polarity, and neurogenesis (Weingarten et al. 1975; Witman et al. 1976; Caceres and Kosik 1990; Harada et al. 1994; Dixit et al. 2008). The leading role of tau is its ability to assist microtubule assembly and stability (Weingarten et al. 1975; Lee et al. 2001). Besides neuron, tau expression has been proclaimed in different non-neuronal cells like liver, kidney, and muscle (Kenner et al. 1994; Gu et al. 1996). Tau has been also expressed in human breast, prostate, gastric, and pancreatic cancer (Sangrajrang et al. 1998; Rouzier et al. 2005; Mimori et al. 2006; Jimeno et al. 2007; Souter and Lee 2009). Tau from non-neuronal cells has similar structure and function with brain tau (Cross et al. 2000).

The microtubule assembly and stability of tau are conducted by the phosphorylation state of tau that is also regulated by kinases and phosphatases (Mandelkow et al. 1995; Liu et al. 2005). For immaculate function of tau, a normal phosphorylation level of tau is demanded; whereas if this typical phosphorylation level of tau is changed to hyperphosphorylated state, then the hyperphosphorylated tau fails to keep its biological activity (Kolarova et al. 2012). In age-related neurological disorders like Alzheimer’s disease (AD), tau becomes aberrantly hyperphosphorylated (Kosik et al. 1986; Wood et al. 1986). Some cell cycle markers may be changed in some diseases linked with existing abnormal tau, indicating the presence of anomalous tau responsible for the imperfect cell cycle re-entry (Andorfer et al. 2005).

Colorectal cancer is one of the dominant reasons of death by cancer among the people of western world (Jemal et al. 2003). As far as we know, however, there is no report on the expression of tau in colorectal cancer till now. Here, we investigated the expression, phosphorylation, and microtubule binding of tau in different colorectal cancer cell lines along with normal colorectal cell line. Our results demonstrated that tau is not only expressed but also phosphorylated in some of the colorectal cancer cell lines and pointed out that tau in colorectal cancer cells may have similarities with age-related dementia like AD in some aspects.

Materials and methods

Cell lines and cell culture

Human colorectal cancer cell lines (HCT 116, HT-29, Caco-2, DLD-1, and SW480) and human colorectal normal cell line (CCD-18Co) were purchased from ATCC (Manassa, VA, USA). Human neuroblastoma cell line (SH-SY5Y) was purchased from Korean Cell Line Bank (KCLB, Seoul, Korea). HCT 116, CCD-18Co, and SH-SY5Y cells were cultured in MEM (EBSS) medium (Hyclone, Logan, Utah, USA) with 10 % (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and penicillin–streptomycin (Hyclone). Caco-2 and HT-29 cells were cultured in DMEM medium (Hyclone) with 10 % (v/v) FBS, non-essential amino acid (WelGene, Daegu, Korea), and penicillin–streptomycin (Hyclone). Also, DLD-1 and SW480 cells were cultured in RPMI medium (Hyclone) with 10 % (v/v) FBS and penicillin–streptomycin (Hyclone).

Antibodies

The mouse monoclonal antibody (mAb) of tau (tau-13) was bought from Abcam Inc. (Cambridge, MA, USA). The horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-linked anti-mouse IgG was purchased from Cell Signaling (Danvers, MA, USA). Also rabbit mAb of alpha-tubulin (11H10) and the HRP-linked goat anti-rabbit IgG were also bought from Cell Signaling. Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody was purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA).

Western blot analysis for tau expression

For western blot analysis, the cultured cells were washed with PBS, harvested, and resuspended in cell lysis buffer plus PMSF, protease inhibitor, and phosphatase inhibitor (Cell signaling) at 4 °C. Cell homogenates were centrifuged at 22,570×g for 25 min. Supernatant was taken, separated on 10 % SDS–polyacrylamide gel, and transferred to Immun-Blot PVDF membrane (Biorad, Hercules, CA, USA). The membranes were incubated with mouse anti-tau antibody (1:5000; Abcam) and rabbit anti-α-tubulin antibody followed by incubation of relevant secondary antibody conjugated with HRP. The signals on membrane were developed by SuperSignal West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and pictured by LAS-4000 Luminescent image analyzer (Fujifilm Co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan).

Phosphatase treatment

From the cell lysates that were prepared for tau expression, the proteins were treated with thermosensitive alkaline phosphatase (Thermo Scientific FastAP Alkaline Phosphatase; Thermo Fisher Scientific) that contains alkaline phosphatase and alkaline phosphatase buffer. Cell lysates that contain enough protein were added with alkaline phosphatase and alkaline phosphatase buffer, and also water if need. Tapping a couple of times to mix properly and incubation at 37 °C for 1 h were done. Then sample buffer was introduced and heated at 100 °C for 5 min to stop the reaction. For control of each sample, samples having same amount of protein were prepared. As a reference of dephosphorylated tau, tau ladder (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA), which was prepared in Escherichia coli and had 6 isoforms, was used.

Immunofluorescence

HCT 116, HT-29, SW480, Caco-2, CCD-18Co, and SH-SY5Y cells were grown on cover glass placed in 6-well plates. The cells were fixed with 3.7 % paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with 3 % BSA and 0.1 % Triton X-100 in PBS for 10 min, and blocked with 3 % BSA in PBS solution for 1 h at room temperature. The cells were probed with mouse anti-tau (tau-13) mAb (Abcam-ab24634) in PBS with 1 % BSA and 0.1 % Triton X-100 (1:500 dilution) and visualized with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody (1:500 dilution). Cells were washed with PBS again and mounted with DAPI (VECTASHIELD, Vector laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) for 1 h at dark humid chamber. Leica TCs SP5 confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems AG, Wetzlar, Germany) was used to take the image.

Microtubule (MT) binding

Taxol-stabilized and lyophilized MTs and MAP fraction of bovine brain were purchased from Cytoskeleton (Denver, CO, USA). MT binding assay of colorectal cancer cells that express tau, along with neuroblastoma cell, was done as previously described by Souter (Souter and Lee 2009). The microtubules were pelleted. Supernatant containing unbound tau was removed, and equal volume of sample buffer was added to pellet as supernatant and check the protein concentration. Both fractions of pellet and supernatant were immunoblotted and compared.

Results

Expression of tau

Though tau is a neuronal protein, it is also found in different cancer cell lines of organs like breast (Rouzier et al. 2005), prostate (Sangrajrang et al. 1998; Souter and Lee 2009), stomach (Mimori et al. 2006), and pancreas (Jimeno et al. 2007). Here we tried to search the expression of tau in different colorectal cancer cell lines (HCT 116, HT-29, SW480, Caco-2, and DLD-1) along with non-cancerous colorectal cell line (CCD-18Co) as well. Vast level of tau was detected on SW480 and HCT 116, and very truncated level of tau was detected on CCD-18Co (Fig. 1A). Caco-2, HT-29, and DLD-1 did not express tau even when the blot was intentionally overexposed (data not shown). As the expression of fetal tau isoform was reported in human neuroblastoma cell (SH-SY5Y) (Smith et al. 1995), we compared the level of tau expression of SH-SY5Y with colorectal cell lines. We showed that colorectal cell lines exhibited a broader assortment of tau and different expression levels of total tau.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Expression (A) and phosphorylation (B) of tau in different colorectal cell lines. (A) Expression of tau in different colorectal cell lines. (B) Odd lanes showed control incubation, whereas even lanes showed phosphatase treatment. Phosphatase treatment showed increased mobility of tau. Six isoforms of tau synthesized in E. coli were run as comparison (tau ladder)

Phosphorylation of tau

To check the possible phosphorylation of colorectal tau, we treated tau with alkaline phosphatase. As we know that phosphorylated protein moves slower than non-phosphorylated one, we can pattern phosphorylation of protein by phosphatase treatment. By phosphatase treatment, tau of colorectal cancer cells migrated faster (Fig. 1B, Lanes 3–6) whereas that of colorectal non-cancer cell did not (Fig. 1B, Lanes 1–2).

Localization of tau

Using confocal microscopy, the localization and expression of tau were observed in colorectal cancer cells along with the normal cell. Tau with microtubules appeared at cell boundary. Unbound tau was clearly apparent in HCT 116 and SW480 (Fig. 2). Low amount of tau was observed in CCD-18Co as shown in Fig. 2 as well as in Fig. 1. In HT-29 and Caco-2, tau expression was not observed. Moderate level of tau was detected in neuroblastoma cell SH-SY5Y (positive control).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Localization of tau in colorectal cancer and normal cell lines. Confocal immunofluorescence of anti-tau antibody in HCT 116, SW480, HT-29, Caco-2, CCD-18Co, and SH-SY5Y cells was shown in green. Cell nuclear was stained with blue

Microtubule binding of tau

To compare the microtubule binding of HCT 116 tau with other tau, tau from HCT 116, SH-SY5Y, and E. coli, and bovine brain MAPs were subjected to microtubule binding assay. Tau from E. coli and MAPs from bovine brain were mainly bound to microtubules. In HCT 116 and SH-SY5Y, a large proportion of tau existed as unbound (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

MT binding of tau in HCT116 cell line protein from HCT 116 and SH-SH5Y cells, E. coli tau and bovine brain MAPs were incubated with microtubules as illustrated in materials and methods. The same proportions of supernatant (S) and pellet (P) fractions of tau were immunoblotted with anti-tau mAb. Control lanes of MT only (lanes 9–10) were run to confirm that MT does not have any endogenous tau

Discussion

Till now, there is no report published on tau in colorectal cancer. Tau levels might be related to the resistance of various cancers to anti-mitotic drugs (Rouzier et al. 2005; Mimori et al. 2006; Jimeno et al. 2007). Our hypothesis was that tau might be expressed and phosphorylated in some colorectal cancer cells like other cancers and AD.

In case of breast cancer, 52 % of patients are tau negative (Rouzier et al. 2005); nearly same result (57 %) was demonstrated by a different research group (Pusztai et al. 2009). 30 % of patients are tau negative in gastric cancer (Mimori et al. 2006) and 25.7 % of patients are tau negative in ovarian cancer (Smoter et al. 2013). These results indicate that tau expression may be different depending on the type of cancer. However, additional research is needed to figure out tau expression according to the different stage in the same type of cancer. In our experiment, we have compared the expression of tau in different colorectal cancer cell lines (genetic phenotype, ploidy, and Duke stage) along with colorectal normal cell line mainly at protein level. Out of five colorectal cancer cell lines, SW480 and HCT 116 expressed high levels of tau, which were confirmed by immunofluorescence experiment. The mechanism by which tau expression is regulated differently in each colorectal cancer requires further investigation. As there are a lot of neuronal and non-neuronal cell lines not expressing different tau isoforms (Smith et al. 1995), the expression of different tau isoforms in HCT 116 marks an auspicious cell to explore human colorectal tau. SW480 and HCT 116 showed different patterns of tau expression and phosphorylation, whereas CCD-18Co expressed only tiny amount of tau that was not phosphorylated.

The activity of tau is controlled by its phosphorylation. The phosphorylation of tau normally occurred in neurodegenerative disease. Our experimental data showed that human colorectal cancer tau was also phosphorylated like neurodegenerative disease such as AD. However, colorectal normal cell that expressed a very low level of tau was not phosphorylated as like normal adult brain tau. In this aspect, we can get some similarities of neurodegenerative disease such as AD with colorectal cancer.

Hyperphosphorylation lowers the activity of tau to endorse microtubule assembly C in AD (Lindwall and Cole 1984; Alonso et al. 1994, 1996). In this study, tau expressed in colorectal cancer cell lines was hyperphosphorylated, and a bulky proportion of the tau did not bind to microtubules. In some studies of tau in different cancers, there had been a relationship with tau expression and drug resistance (Rouzier et al. 2005; Wagner et al. 2005; Souter and Lee 2009; Li et al. 2013; Smoter et al. 2013; Wang et al. 2013). When phosphatase and tensin homolog, a tumor suppressor, lost phosphatase activity, tau was hyperphosphorylated resulting in tau aggregation (Zhang et al. 2006). The exact mechanism of how hyperphosphorylation of tau affects the occurrence and progression of colorectal cancer is a topic of further research. The regulation of expression and phosphorylation of tau in SW480 and HCT 116 might be applied to the therapeutic strategy of colorectal cancer through the further study.

References

  • Alonso AC, Zaidi T, Grundke-Iqbal I, Iqbal K (1994) Role of abnormally phosphorylated tau in the breakdown of microtubules in Alzheimer disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:5562–5566

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso AC, Grundke-Iqbal I, Iqbal K (1996) Alzheimer’s disease hyperphosphorylated tau sequesters normal tau into tangles of filaments and disassembles microtubules. Nat Med 2:783–787

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andorfer C, Acker CM, Kress Y, Hof PR, Duff K, Davies P (2005) Cell-cycle reentry and cell death in transgenic mice expressing nonmutant human tau isoforms. J Neurosci 25:5446–5454

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caceres A, Kosik KS (1990) Inhibition of neurite polarity by tau antisense oligonucleotides in primary cerebellar neurons. Nature 343:461–463

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cross DC, Munoz JP, Hernandez P, Maccioni RB (2000) Nuclear and cytoplasmic tau proteins from human nonneuronal cells share common structural and functional features with brain tau. J Cell Biochem 78:305–317

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit R, Ross JL, Goldman YE, Holzbaur EL (2008) Differential regulation of dynein and kinesin motor proteins by tau. Science 319:1086–1089

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gu Y, Oyama F, Ihara Y (1996) Tau is widely expressed in rat tissues. J Neurochem 67:1235–1244

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harada A, Oguchi K, Okabe S, Kuno J, Terada S, Ohshima T, Sato-Yoshitake R, Takei Y, Noda T, Hirokawa N (1994) Altered microtubule organization in small-calibre axons of mice lacking tau protein. Nature 369:488–491

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jemal A, Murray T, Samuels A, Ghafoor A, Ward E, Thun MJ (2003) Cancer statistics. CA-Cancer J Clin 53:5–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jimeno A, Hallur G, Chan A, Zhang X, Cusatis G, Chan F, Shah P, Chen R, Hamel E, Garrett-Mayer E, Khan S, Hidalgo M (2007) Development of two novel benzoylphenylurea sulfur analogues and evidence that the microtubule-associated protein tau is predictive of their activity in pancreatic cancer. Mol Cancer Ther 6:1509–1516

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kenner L, El-Shabrawi Y, Hutter H, Forstner M, Zatloukal K, Hoefler G, Preisegger KH, Kurzbauer R, Denk H (1994) Expression of three- and four-repeat tau isoforms in mouse liver. Hepatology 20:1086–1089

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kolarova M, Garcia-Sierra F, Bartos A, Ricny J, Ripova D (2012) Structure and pathology of tau protein in Alzheimer disease. Int J Alzheimer’s Dis 2012:731526

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosik KS, Joachim CL, Selkoe DJ (1986) Microtubule-associated protein tau (tau) is a major antigenic component of paired helical filaments in Alzheimer disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:4044–4048

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee VM, Goedert M, Trojanowski JQ (2001) Neurodegenerative tauopathies. Annu Rev Neurosci 24:1121–1159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li ZH, Xiong QY, Tu JH, Gong Y, Qiu W, Zhang HQ, Wei WS, Hou YF, Cui WQ (2013) Tau proteins expressions in advanced breast cancer and its significance in taxane-containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Med Oncol 30:591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindwall G, Cole RD (1984) Phosphorylation affects the ability of tau protein to promote microtubule assembly. J Biol Chem 259:5301–5305

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu F, Iqbal K, Grundke-Iqbal I, Rossie S, Gong CX (2005) Dephosphorylation of tau by protein phosphatase 5: impairment in Alzheimer’s disease. J Biol Chem 280:1790–1796

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelkow EM, Biernat J, Drewes G, Gustke N, Trinczek B, Mandelkow E (1995) Tau domains, phosphorylation, and interactions with microtubules. Neurobiol Aging 16:355–362

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mimori K, Sadanaga N, Yoshikawa Y, Ishikawa K, Hashimoto M, Tanaka F, Sasaki A, Inoue H, Sugimachi K, Mori M (2006) Reduced tau expression in gastric cancer can identify candidates for successful Paclitaxel treatment. Brit J Cancer 94:1894–1897

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pusztai L, Jeong JH, Gong Y, Ross JS, Kim C, Paik S, Rouzier R, Andre F, Hortobagyi GN, Wolmark N, Symmans WF (2009) Evaluation of microtubule-associated protein-tau expression as a prognostic and predictive marker in the NSABP-B 28 randomized clinical trial. J Clin Oncol 27:4287–4292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rouzier R, Rajan R, Wagner P, Hess KR, Gold DL, Stec J, Ayers M, Ross JS, Zhang P, Buchholz TA, Kuerer H, Green M, Arun B, Hortobagyi GN, Symmans WF, Pusztai L (2005) Microtubule-associated protein tau: a marker of paclitaxel sensitivity in breast cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:8315–8320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sangrajrang S, Denoulet P, Millot G, Tatoud R, Podgorniak MP, Tew KD, Calvo F, Fellous A (1998) Estramustine resistance correlates with tau over-expression in human prostatic carcinoma cells. Int J Cancer 77:626–631

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith CJ, Anderton BH, Davis DR, Gallo JM (1995) Tau isoform expression and phosphorylation state during differentiation of cultured neuronal cells. FEBS Lett 375:243–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smoter M, Bodnar L, Grala B, Stec R, Zieniuk K, Kozlowski W, Szczylik C (2013) Tau protein as a potential predictive marker in epithelial ovarian cancer patients treated with paclitaxel/platinum first-line chemotherapy. J Exp Clin Canc Res 32:25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Souter S, Lee G (2009) Microtubule-associated protein tau in human prostate cancer cells: isoforms, phosphorylation, and interactions. J Cell Biochem 108:555–564

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner P, Wang B, Clark E, Lee H, Rouzier R, Pusztai L (2005) Microtubule associated protein (MAP)-tau: a novel mediator of paclitaxel sensitivity in vitro and in vivo. Cell Cycle 4:1149–1152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Wang N, Shao G, Qian J, Shen D, Fei Y, Mao W, Wu D (2013) Relationship between gastric cancer tau protein expression and paclitaxel sensitivity. Pathol Oncol Res 19:429–435

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weingarten MD, Lockwood AH, Hwo SY, Kirschner MW (1975) A protein factor essential for microtubule assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72:1858–1862

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Witman GB, Cleveland DW, Weingarten MD, Kirschner MW (1976) Tubulin requires tau for growth onto microtubule initiating sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 73:4070–4074

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wood JG, Mirra SS, Pollock NJ, Binder LI (1986) Neurofibrillary tangles of Alzheimer disease share antigenic determinants with the axonal microtubule-associated protein tau (tau). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:4040–4043

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Zhang YW, Liu S, Bulloj A, Tong GG, Zhang Z, Liao FF, Xu H (2006) Tumor suppressor PTEN affects tau phosphorylation: deficiency in the phosphatase activity of PTEN increases aggregation of an FTDP-17 mutant tau. Mol Neurodegener 1:7

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was performed as part of the project titled ‘Development and industrialization of high value cosmetic raw materials from marine microalgae,’ funded by the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, Korea and was supported by an intramural Grant (2Z04690) from the KIST Gangneung Institute of Natural Products.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheol-Ho Pan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huda, M.N., Kim, D.H., Erdene-Ochir, E. et al. Expression, phosphorylation, localization, and microtubule binding of tau in colorectal cell lines. Appl Biol Chem 59, 807–812 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13765-016-0228-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13765-016-0228-x

Keywords