Skip to main content
  • Review
  • Published:

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria used in South Korea

Abstract

Many bacteria found in the rhizosphere provide contribution for the host plant’s growth and protection that are known as plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). Plant–microbe interactions in the rhizosphere are important factors in determining the health of plants. Research for commercialization of these PGPR as an alternative to the use of chemical fertilizers for a more environmentally friendly treatment is continuously being improved. In this review, we discuss the essential traits that rhizobacteria must possess for them to be considered PGPR and report the bacterial species that exhibit these essential plant growth-promoting activities and which are approved for use by the South Korean regulations.

Introduction

One of the great challenges currently under consideration is to developing environmentally wide-ranging and sustainable crop production methods. Crop production must be increased to provide food for the increasing population. Although the use of chemical fertilizers is a viable option, there are health risks associated when their improper use and these agents can cause environmental destruction. Plant biotechnology has provided insight and aided the development of new crops to overcome complications caused by abiotic stresses (soil salinization and sodification, drought, soil pH, and temperature) and biotic factors such as pathogenicity by other living organisms, including bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites [1, 2].

In plant–microbe interactions, which have been widely examined, the host plant and bacteria present along the rhizosphere exhibit intimate interactions. These interactions promote host plant growth and pathogen suppression. The rhizosphere is a well-characterized ecological niche affected by root exudates [3]. Bacteria with direct and indirect positive effects on the growth and health of the plant are known as plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). In this review, we describe various important properties required by bacterial species to be considered PGPR and report various bacterial species exhibiting PGP qualities in South Korea.

Phytohormone production

Most distinguished phytohormones are consisted of cytokinins, auxins, gibberellins, ethylene, and abscisic acid, and PGPR show potential for the production of these hormones. These phytohormones can facilitate processes such as plant cell enlargement, division, and extension of symbiotic and non-symbiotic roots [1, 4, 5]. Furthermore, plant-associated bacteria may influence the hormonal balance of a plant.

Indole acetic acid (IAA), also known as auxin, governs different stages of plant growth and development, namely cell division, cell elongation, and tissue differentiation, and assists in apical dominance. IAA produced by rhizobacteria affects the root system through the increase of weight and size, the number of branches, and the surface area in contact with the soil.

Similarly, plant responses to cytokinin application include enhanced cell division, enhanced root development, enhanced root hair formation, inhibited root elongation, shoot initiation, and other physiological responses. Gibberellins, in contrast, are a group of phytohormones that affects developmental strategies in higher plants and include stem elongation, seed germination, flowering, and fruit setting [6, 7].

Ethylene synthesis inhibition

Ethylene is another growth regulator that affects physiological processes in plants. It is related primarily to the plant’s growth and defense systems which are triggered by stress responses. Factors such as light, temperature, salinity, pathogen attacks, and nutritional status alter ethylene levels. Moreover, ethylene also facilitates additional processes not related to stress such as ripening, root elongation, and seed development. As ethylene levels decrease, root system growth increases, as described above. Degradation of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC), a direct precursor of ethylene, creates a concentration gradient that favors its exudation. Maintaining a balance between the ethylene and auxin is important since the two are related growth regulators, some effects attributed to auxin-producing bacteria result from ACC degradation [1, 8].

Free nitrogen fixation

Nitrogen is a key component in the synthesis of cellular enzymes, proteins, chlorophyll, DNA, and RNA, and, as a result, it is important in plant growth. Bacterial strains capable of nitrogen fixation are divided into two categories: root/legume-associated symbiotic bacteria and free nitrogen-fixing bacteria. The former specifically infect the roots to produce nodules, while the latter are non-specific and can form symbiotic relationships with other plants and organisms [1, 9].

Phosphate solubilization

Phosphorus is the second most important mineral nutrient after nitrogen limiting plant growth. Although soils contain a high concentration of total phosphorus, the amount available for plant uptake is limited because P is in an insoluble form. Bacteria present in the rhizosphere can solubilize phosphate through different mechanisms. The most common method of solubilizing phosphorus is by secreting organic acids that act as chelators. Solubilization of P in the rhizosphere is the most common mode of action that increases the availability of nutrients for host plant uptake [10].

Production of siderophore

Another essential plant nutrient is iron. Iron serves as a cofactor for numerous enzymes that are important in physiological processes such as photosynthesis, nitrogen fixation, and respiration. Similar to phosphorus, iron is abundant in the soil but is not available for plant uptake because Fe3+ predominates and reacts to form insoluble hydroxides. In a similar manner to solubilizing phosphates, bacteria present in the rhizosphere release organic compounds for chelation. A different strategy involves absorbing the iron-organic compound complex, where the iron is reduced in the plant and directly assimilated [11].

Enzyme synthesis that hydrolyzes fungal cell walls

PGPR may be applicable in agriculture for the biocontrol of plant pathogens. Production of cell wall-degrading enzymes plays a very important role in controlling pathogens. Cell wall-degrading enzymes including chitinase, β-1,3-glucanase, cellulase, and protease that are secreted by PGPR directly inhibit the hyphal growth of fungal pathogens through the degradation of their cell which may be an alternative method for replacing chemical fungicides [2, 10, 12].

PGPR species in South Korea

South Korea is one of the top countries leading research and development for biotechnology. Development of PGPR is one focus of this field. The South Korean government approved the use of 108 total species of bacteria, yeast, and fungi as fertilizers and some species as feeds. However, there was some misunderstanding because of changes in taxonomy and some isolates were found to be the same species. In the present study, only 51 bacterial species have been identified to have strains included in the Korean Agricultural Culture Collection (KACC). Among these, 40 were found to have PGP activities in previous studies (Table 1), while the 11 species require further examination. Additional research is needed to evaluate the PGP characteristics of these 11 species (Table 2).

Table 1 Regulated bacterial species in South Korea and their different PGP characteristics based on references with their respective KACC strain
Table 2 Regulated bacterial species in South Korea and their KACC strains without reference for PGP qualities

Conclusion

The PGP activities of rhizosphere bacteria show great promise for applications in sustainable and ecofriendly agriculture. PGPR not only promote growth by providing nutrients but are also useful as biocontrol agents to protect plants from pathogens. While the fundamentals of how PGPR promote growth are well known, there is still much more to learn about the mechanisms underlying plant–microbe interactions for commercial production for the microbes as an alternative to chemical fertilizers.

References

  1. Glick BR (2014) Bacteria with ACC deaminase can promote plant growth and help to feed the world. Mirobiol Res 169:30–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jung BK, Hong SJ, Park GS, Kim MC, Shin JH (2018) Isolation of Burkholderia cepacia JBK9 with plant growth-promoting activity while producing pyrrolnitrin antagonistic to plant fungal diseases. Appl Biol Chem 61:173–180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Berg G (2009) Plant–microbe interactions promoting plant growth and health: perspectives for controlled u se of microorganisms in agriculture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 84:11–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Arshad M, Frankenberger WT Jr (1997) Plant growth-regulating substances in the rhizosphere: microbial production and functions. Adv Agron 62:45–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Patten CL, Glick BR (1996) Bacterial biosynthesis of indole-3-acetic acid. Can J Microbiol 42:207–220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tsavkelova EA, Klimova SY, Cherdyntseva TA, Netrusov AI (2006) Microbial producers of plant growth stimulators and their practical use: a review. Appl Biochem Microbiol 42:117–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Forghani AH, Almodares A, Ehsanpour AA (2018) Potential objectives for gibberellic acid and paclobutrazol under salt stress in sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor [L.] Moench cv. Sofra). Appl Biol Chem 61:113–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ali S, Khan MA, Kim WC (2018) Pseudomonas veronii KJ mitigates flood stress-associated damage in Sesamum indicum L. Appl Biol Chem 61:575–585

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Oberson A, Frossard E, Buehlmann C, Mayer J, Maeder P, Luescher A (2013) Nitrogen fixation and transfer in grass-clover leys under organic and conventional cropping systems. Plant Soil 371:237–255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Vessey JK (2003) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers. Plant Soil 255:571–586

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Payne SM (1994) Detection, isolation, and characterization of siderophores. Methods Enzymol 235:329–344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hwang EJ, Lee YS, Choi YL (2018) Cloning, purification, and characterization of the organic solvent tolerant β-glucosidase, OaBGL84, from Olleya aquimaris DAU311. Appl Biol Chem 61:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chaudhari Bhushan L, Chincholkar Sudhir B, Rane Makarand R, Sarode Prashant D (2009) Siderophoregenic Acinetobacter calcoaceticus isolated from wheat rhizosphere with strong PGPR activity. Malays J Microbiol 5:6–12

    Google Scholar 

  14. Muthukumarasamy R, Cleenwerck I, Revathi G, Vadivelu M, Janssens D, Hoste B, Kang UG, Park KD, Son CY, Sa T, Caballero-Mellado J (2005) Natural association of Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus and diazotrophic Acetobacter peroxydans with wetland rice. Syst Appl Microbiol 28:277–286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Flores A, Nisola GM, Cho E, Gwon EM, Kim H, Lee C, Park S, Chung WJ (2007) Bioaugmented sulfur-oxidizing denitrification system with Alcaligenes defragrans B21 for high nitrate containing wastewater treatment. Bioproc Biosyst Eng 30:197–205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tortora ML, Díaz-Ricci JC, Pedraza RO (2011) Azospirillum brasilense siderophores with antifungal activity against Colletotrichum acutatum. Arch Microbiol 193:275–286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yuan J, Ruan Y, Wang B, Zhang J, Waseem R, Huang Q, Shen Q (2013) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria strain Bacillus amyloliquefaciens NJN-6-enriched bio-organic fertilizer suppressed Fusarium wilt and promoted the growth of banana plants. J Agric Food Chem 61:3774–3780

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gutiérrez-Mañero FJ, Ramos-Solano B, Mehouachi J, Tadeo FR, Talon M (2001) The plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria Bacillus pumilus and Bacillus licheniformis produce high amounts of physiologically active gibberellins. Physiol Plant 111:206–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Belimov AA, Dodd IC, Safronova VI, Dumova VA, Shaposhnikov AI, Ladatko AG, Davies WJ (2014) Abscisic acid metabolizing rhizobacteria decrease ABA concentrations in planta and alter plant growth. Plant Physiol Biochem 74:84–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Seldin L, Dubnau D (1985) Deoxyribonucleic acid homology among Bacillus polymyxa, Bacillus macerans, Bacillus azotofixans, and other nitrogen-fixing Bacillus strains. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 35:151–154

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Porcel R, Zamarreño ÁM, García-Mina JM, Aroca R (2014) Involvement of plant endogenous ABA in Bacillus megaterium PGPR activity in tomato plants. BMC Plant Biol 14:36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bacon CW, Hinton DM (2002) Endophytic and biological control potential of Bacillus mojavensis and related species. Biol Control 23:74–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Recep K, Fikrettin S, Erkol D, Cafer E (2009) Biological control of the potato dry rot caused by Fusarium species using PGPR strains. Biol Control 50:194–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim BJ, Jung HK, Jeong YS, Yang SJ, Hong JH (2016) Effect of microencapsulated Bacillus subtilis strain CBD2-fermented grain on loperamide-induced constipation in mice. Appl Biol Chem 59:451–462

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhao Z, Wang Q, Wang K, Brian K, Liu C, Gu Y (2010) Study of the antifungal activity of Bacillus vallismortis ZZ185 in vitro and identification of its antifungal components. Bioresour Technol 101:292–297

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Nam MH, Park MS, Kim HG, Yoo SJ (2009) Biological control of strawberry Fusarium wilt caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. fragariae using Bacillus velezensis BS87 and RK1 formulation. J Microbiol Biotechnol 19:520–524

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Edwards SG, Seddon B (2001) Mode of antagonism of Brevibacillus brevis against Botrytis cinerea in vitro. J Appl Microbiol 91:652–659

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Meena S, Gothwal RK, Mohan MK, Ghosh P (2014) Production and purification of a hyperthermostable chitinase from Brevibacillus formosus BISR-1 isolated from the Great Indian Desert soils. Extremophiles 18:451–462

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lobna M, Zawam H (2010) Efficacy of some biocontrol agents on reproduction and development of Meloidogyne incognita infecting tomato. J Am Sci 6:495–509

    Google Scholar 

  30. Motta AS, Brandelli A (2002) Characterization of an antibacterial peptide produced by Brevibacterium linens. J Appl Microbiol 92:63–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Halda-Alija L (2003) Identification of indole-3-acetic acid producing freshwater wetland rhizosphere bacteria associated with Juncus effusus L. Can J Microbiol 49:781–787

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ren JH, Ye JR, Liu H, Xu XL, Wu XQ (2011) Isolation and characterization of a new Burkholderia pyrrocinia strain JK-SH007 as a potential biocontrol agent. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 27:2203–2215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Martinez C, Michaud M, Belanger RR, Tweddell RJ (2002) Identification of soils suppressive against Helminthosporium solani, the causal agent of potato silver scurf. Soil Biol Biochem 34:1861–1868

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhao K, Penttinen P, Chen Q, Guan T, Lindström K, Ao X, Zhang L, Zhang X (2012) The rhizospheres of traditional medicinal plants in Panxi, China, host a diverse selection of actinobacteria with antimicrobial properties. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 94:1321–1335

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Cottyn B, Debode J, Regalado E, Mew TW, Swings J (2009) Phenotypic and genetic diversity of rice seed-associated bacteria and their role in pathogenicity and biological control. J Appl Microbiol 107:885–897

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Al-Dohail MA, Hashim R, Aliyu-Paiko M (2011) Evaluating the use of Lactobacillus acidophilus as a biocontrol agent against common pathogenic bacteria and the effects on the haematology parameters and histopathology in African catfish Clarias gariepinus juveniles. Aquac Res 42:196–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mohite B (2013) Isolation and characterization of indole acetic acid (IAA) producing bacteria from rhizospheric soil and its effect on plant growth. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 13:638–649

    Google Scholar 

  38. Oliveira PM, Zannini E, Arendt EK (2014) Cereal fungal infection, mycotoxins, and lactic acid bacteria mediated bioprotection: from crop farming to cereal products. Food Microbiol 37:78–95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. De Keersmaecker SC, Verhoeven TL, Desair J, Marchal K, Vanderleyden J, Nagy I (2006) Strong antimicrobial activity of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG against Salmonella typhimurium is due to accumulation of lactic acid. FEMS Microbiol Lett 259:89–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Voulgari K, Hatzikamari M, Delepoglou A, Georgakopoulos P, Litopoulou-Tzanetaki E, Tzanetakis N (2010) Antifungal activity of non-starter lactic acid bacteria isolates from dairy products. Food Control 21:136–142

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Gerez CL, Torres MJ, De Valdez GF, Rollán G (2013) Control of spoilage fungi by lactic acid bacteria. Biol Control 64:231–237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Hassan YI, Bullerman LB (2008) Antifungal activity of Lactobacillus paracasei ssp. tolerans isolated from a sourdough bread culture. Int J Food Microbiol 121:112–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Mejri L, Hassouna M (2016) Characterization and selection of Lactobacillus plantarum species isolated from dry fermented sausage reformulated with camel meat and hump fat. Appl Biol Chem 59:533–542

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Roy U, Batish VK, Grover S, Neelakantan S (1996) Production of antifungal substance by Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis CHD-28.3. Int J Food Microbiol 32:27–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Ji GH, Wei LF, He YQ, Wu YP, Bai XH (2008) Biological control of rice bacterial blight by Lysobacter antibioticus strain 13-1. Biol Control 45:288–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Fang LZ, Kun XC, Song ZC, Qin XJ, Qiu HY, Qun DC, He MM (2011) Fungistatic intensity of agricultural soil against fungal agents and phylogenetic analysis on the actinobacteria involved. Curr Microbiol 62:1152–1159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Vimal V, Rajan BM, Kannabiran K (2009) Antimicrobial activity of marine Actinomycete, Nocardiopsis sp. VITSVK 5 (FJ973467). Asian J Med Sci 1:57–63

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Montealegre JR, Herrera R, Velásquez JC, Silva P, Besoaín X, Pérez LM (2005) Biocontrol of root and crown rot in tomatoes under greenhouse conditions using Trichoderma harzianum and Paenibacillus lentimorbus: Additional effect of solarization. Electron J Biotechnol 8:249–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Bhunia AK, Johnson MC, Ray B (1988) Purification, characterization and antimicrobial spectrum of a bacteriocin produced by Pediococcus acidilactici. J Appl Bacteriol 65:261–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Bowen D, Rocheleau TA, Blackburn M, Andreev O, Golubeva E, Bhartia R (1998) Insecticidal toxins from the bacterium Photorhabdus luminescens. Science 280:2129–2132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. García de Salamone IE, Hynes RK, Nelson LM (2001) Cytokinin production by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and selected mutants. Can J Microbiol 47:404–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Zhang Z, Yuen GY, Sarath G, Penheiter AR (2001) Chitinases from the plant disease biocontrol agent, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia C3. Phytopathology 91:204–211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Dashti N, Ali N, Khanafer M, Al-Awadhi H, Sorkhoh N, Radwan S (2015) Olive-pomace harbors bacteria with the potential for hydrocarbon-biodegradation, nitrogen-fixation and mercury-resistance: promising material for waste-oil-bioremediation. J Environ Manag 155:49–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Raj DPRS, Linda R, Babyson RS (2014) Molecular characterization of phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) from pristine soil. Int J Innov Sci Eng Technol 1:317–324

    Google Scholar 

  55. Xie H, Pasternak JJ, Glick BR (1996) Isolation and characterization of mutants of the plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Pseudomonas putida GR12-2 that overproduce indoleacetic acid. Curr Microbiol 32:67–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Elbadry M, Gamal-Eldin H, Elbanna K (1999) Effects of Rhodobacter capsulatus inoculation in combination with graded levels of nitrogen fertilizer on growth and yield of rice in pots and lysimeter experiments. World J Microb Biotechnol 15:393–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Satoh T, Hoshino Y, Kitamura H (1976) Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides forma sp. denitrificans, a denitrifying strain as a subspecies of Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides. Arch Microbiol 108:265–269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Larimer FW, Chain P, Hauser L, Lamerdin J, Malfatti S, Do L, Land ML, Pelletier DA, Beatty JT, Lang AS, Gibson JL, Hanson TE, Bobst C, Torres JL, Peres C, Harrison FH, Gibson J, Tabita FR, Harwood CS (2004) Complete genome sequence of the metabolically versatile photosynthetic bacterium Rhodopseudomonas palustris. Nat Biotechnol 22:55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Kobayashi YO, Kobayashi A, Maeda M, Someya N, Takenaka S (2015) Biological control of potato scab and antibiosis by antagonistic Streptomyces sp. WoRs-501. J Gen Plant Pathol 81:439–448

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Jog R, Nareshkumar G, Rajkumar S (2012) Plant growth promoting potential and soil enzyme production of the most abundant Streptomyces spp. from wheat rhizosphere. J Appl Microbiol 113:1154–1164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Swart EA, Romano AH, Waksman SA (1950) Fradicin, an antifungal agent produced by Streptomyces fradiae. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 73:376–378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Montesinos E (2007) Antimicrobial peptides and plant disease control. FEMS Microbiol Lett 270:1–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Itoh Y, Takahashi K, Takizawa H, Nikaidou N, Tanaka H, Nishihashi H, Watanabe T, Nishizawa Y (2003) Family 19 chitinase of Streptomyces griseus HUT6037 increases plant resistance to the fungal disease. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 67:847–855

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Joo GJ (2005) Purification and characterization of an extracellular chitinase from the antifungal biocontrol agent Streptomyces halstedii. Biotechnol Lett 27:1483–1486

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Shekhar N, Bhattacharya D, Kumar D, Gupta RK (2006) Biocontrol of wood-rotting fungi with Streptomyces violaceusniger XL-2. Can J Microbiol 52:805–808

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was carried out with the support of “Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development (Project No. PJ013383)” Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jae-Ho Shin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ibal, J.C., Jung, B.K., Park, C.E. et al. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria used in South Korea. Appl Biol Chem 61, 709–716 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13765-018-0406-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13765-018-0406-0

Keywords