Skip to main content
Applied Biological Chemistry
Download PDF

Improved quantification of catechin and epicatechin in red rice (Oryza sativa L.) using stable isotope dilution liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry

Applied Biological Chemistry volume 65, Article number: 85 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Epimerization can change the catechin content and composition of samples during extraction and analytical analyses. To control the effect of epimerization, we developed a novel and stable isotope dilution liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC–MS) method using catechin-2,3,4-13C3 and epicatechin-2,3,4-13C3 as stable-isotope-labeled internal standards (SIL-ISs). When the SIL-ISs were used, the catechin and epicatechin contents were stable (104–109% and 100–109% of the initial concentration, respectively) despite long storage times. In contrast, when L-2-chlorophenylalanine was used as an internal standard, catechin and epicatechin concentrations of 88–97% and 164–277% of the initial concentration, respectively, were obtained after long storage times. Furthermore, the least significant epimerization effect and highest extractability were observed when extraction was performed at 70 ℃ for 30 min. The recoveries for red rice using the developed isotope dilution LC–MS method at two different concentrations were between 100.72 and 118.67%, with relative standard deviations less than 3.67%.

Introduction

Catechins are flavanols, a class of flavonoids. ( +)-Catechin and (−)-epicatechin are known as major catechin compounds [1]. Catechins have strong antioxidant activity due to their one-electron reduction potential. Hence, catechins are reported to confer various health benefits [2,3,4,5,6,7]. In addition, catechins are considered inexpensive, readily applicable, and safe phytochemicals. Various analytical methods have been developed to determine the catechin contents in plants and food products [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19].

Catechins epimerization is an important factor influencing the composition of catechins in plants. Epimerization can change non-epistructured catechins to epistructured catechins, and vice versa. It is reported to occur over a pH range of 5.4–11.0 and between 34 and 100 ℃ [20, 21]. This changes the catechin content and overall composition of the samples during extraction and analysis. Therefore, several methods for controlling the epimerization of catechins during extraction and analysis have been reported [1, 22].

The analytical techniques for the qualitative-quantitative analyses of catechins have been reported using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy (1H- and 13C-), high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC–MS) [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. NMR spectroscopy has been commonly used to confirm chemical structures for epimerization. LC–MS provides accurate mass, isotopic distribution, additive ion information, and full scan data. Furthermore, LC–MS has been commonly used with stable isotope dilution techniques [23]. This technique is an accurate method for determining the concentration of a given analyte in any type of matrix. It is based on the direct proportionality of the mass fraction and signal intensity ratio of the natural target analyte and an isotopically labeled form of the target analyte.

An analytical method using a stable isotope-labeled internal standard (SIL-IS) can be a useful tool for the precision and accuracy detection of a target analyte. A SIL-IS is a derivative of a target analyte in which several atoms have been replaced with stable isotopes. For this reason, the SIL-IS and target analyte have nearly the same chemical structure and properties and are expected to be similarly affected by epimerization. As a result, overlapping peaks (SIL-IS and target analyte) cannot identify in a highly complex mixtures and the desired components cannot be accurately quantified. The HPLC techniques with UV or fluorescence detectors and NMR spectroscopy only measure integrated overall signal of individual compounds [24]. On the other hand, LC–MS can identify individual metabolite in complex matrix due to accurate measurement of molecular weight. LC–MS has high selectivity and sensitivity. In addition, MS is inherently much more selective and sensitive than NMR spectroscopy [25]. However, stable isotope dilution methods to overcome catechins epimerization issues have yet to be reported.In this study, we developed a novel method for determining catechin and epicatechin contents using LC–MS with SIL-IS to overcome the epimerization effect. Moreover, we evaluated the stability and contents of catechin and epicatechin in red rice extracts over different storage times to investigate the effect of storage time on the epimerization of catechins.

Materials and methods

Catechin and epicatechin (≥ 98%) were purchased from ChemFaces (Wuhan, China). In addition, the materials used in this study include L-2-chlorophenylalanine (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), catechin-2,3,4-13C3 (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Inc, MA, USA), epicatechin-2,3,4-13C3 (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Inc., MA, USA), water (Honeywell Burdick and Jackson, NJ, USA), and red rice (Cultivar: Jagwangdo, obtained from the Agricultural Genetics Resources Center at the National Academy of Agricultural Science, Suwon, Korea). The extraction of catechin and epicatechin was performed according to a previously reported method with slight modifications [26]. Briefly, the rice powder sample (0.01 g) was extracted with 1.0 mL of water containing 1.2 M HCl. In addition, L-2-chlorophenylalanine and the SIL-ISs, catechin-2,3,4-13C3 and epicatechin-2,3,4-13C3, were added to 1.00 μg/mL. To investigate the ideal extraction conditions to achieve the least epimerization effect and highest extraction efficiency, we tested different extraction temperatures and extraction times. The samples were vortexed and incubated at 30, 50, 70, and 100 ℃, with shaking at 1200 rpm, for 10, 20, 30, 60, and 120 min. Subsequently, the samples were centrifuged for 10 min at 16,000 × g and 4 ℃. The upper layer was filtered through a 0.45 μm syringe filter and transferred into an autosampler vial for LC–MS analysis. Catechin and epicatechin were separated on a Develosil ODS-UG-5 column (2.0 × 250 mm, Nomura Chemical, Seto, Japan) by an Agilent 1260 Infinity HPLC System (degasser, quaternary pump, and autosampler) equipped with an Agilent 6120 single quadrupole MS with electrospray ionization (Fig. 1). To investigate the effects of storage time on epimerization, the catechin extract was placed in an autosampler tray for 0, 4, 8, and 12 h before injection. To validate the method, six calibration points of different concentrations of catechin and epicatechin (0.16–5.00 μg/mL) and a fixed volume internal standard (1.00 μg/mL) were prepared. Method validation was performed following Appendix F of the Association of the Official Analytical Collaboration (AOAC) guidelines [27]. Full experimental details are provided in the Additional file 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Chromatograms and mass spectra of catechin, epicatechin, and SIL-IS (catechin-2,3,4-13C3 and epicatechin-2,3,4-13C3). A Selected ion chromatograms of catechin, epicatechin (m/z 291.1) and SIL-IS (m/z 294.1). Mass spectra of B catechin, epicatechin, and C SIL-IS. SIL-IS stable-isotope-labeled internal standard

Full size image

Results and discussion

Effect of extraction temperature and time

The catechin and epicatechin contents of red rice obtained from various extraction temperatures and times are shown in Fig. 2. We found that the catechin content gradually increased according to the extraction time at 30 ℃ (Fig. 2A). However, epicatechin was not detected at 30 ℃. At 50 ℃, more catechin and epicatechin were extracted than at 30 ℃ under identical extraction times (Fig. 2B). After 120 min, the extract processed at 50 ℃ contained more than double the catechin content extracted at 30 ℃. The concentration of catechin at 70 ℃ increased up to 30 min and then rapidly decreased up to 120 min (Fig. 2C). In contrast, the epicatechin concentration at 70 ℃ increased up to 60 min and then remained constant up to 120 min. These results indicate that catechin was epimerized to epicatechin at high temperatures. Wang et al. reported that the level of catechins decreased, whereas that of its isomer increased as a result of increasing temperature [20]. Therefore, after 30 min, the epicatechin content was increasing due to epimerization rather than decreasing due to degradation at high temperatures as catechin did. In a previous study, continued heating after 30 min degraded epicatechin and formed 3,4-dihydroxy benzaldehyde and protocatechuic acid [28]. In this case, the increase in epicatechin content was not proportional to the decrease in catechin content due to epimerization. Finally, when the extraction temperature was 100 ℃, all the catechins degraded (Fig. 2D). In previous studies, the monomeric forms of flavonoids (catechin and epicatechin) were less stable than the polymeric forms when exposed to light, heat, and basic conditions [29]. In another study, the degradation and epimerization of catechin significantly increased after 30 min at elevated temperatures (80 ℃ and 100 ℃) [28]. In summary, poor extraction efficiency was observed for catechin and epicatechin at 30 and 50 ℃. The highest extraction efficiency was obtained at 70 ℃ and 30 min. Furthermore, at 100 ℃, the extract degraded due to the elevated temperature. Therefore, the ideal extraction conditions for reduced epimerization were 70 ℃ and 30 min.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Effect of different extraction temperatures and times on the extraction efficiency of catechin and epicatechin. Area of catechin, epicatechin, catechin-2,3,4-13C3, and epicatechin-2,3,4-13C3 at 30 ℃ A, 50 ℃ B, 70 ℃ C, and 100 ℃ D as extraction time progressed. Catechin (E) and epicatechin (F) stability using L-2-chlorophenylalanine and SIL-IS (catechin-2,3,4-13C3 and epicatechin-2,3,4-13C3) as an internal standard. 100% represents the concentration at 0 h. An increase above 100 means that the catechin and epicatechin content has increased. Percentages under 100 indicate that the catechin and epicatechin content has decreased. Statistical significance was determined by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-tests to compare each time point to 0 h (*p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001). All data are expressed as mean value of three experiments ± SD. C catechin, E epicatechin, SIL-IS stable-isotope-labeled internal standard

Full size image

Epimerization of catechins after extraction

To investigate the effect of storage time on the extraction of catechins from red rice, the aqueous catechin extracts were placed in an autosampler tray for 0, 4, 8, and 12 h before injection (Fig. 2E and F). The changes in the catechin and epicatechin contents were expressed as the percentage remaining (%). Figure 2 E shows the change in catechin content, quantified by SIL-IS and L-2-chlorophenylalanine, according to storage time. The initial catechin concentration (104–109%) was maintained for all storage times tested. However, the catechin content quantified by L-2-chlorophenylalanine was decreased by 12% after 12 h of storage. The changes in epicatechin content quantified by SIL-IS and L-2-chlorophenylalanine, are shown in Fig. 2F. When SIL-IS was employed, the percentage remaining of epicatechin (100–109%) was stable over time. In contrast, the epicatechin quantified by L-2-chlorophenylalanine was significantly increased by approximately three-fold (164–277%) during the storage period. These results indicate that the catechin in red rice was epimerized to epicatechin during storage. Furthermore, the use of L-2-chlorophenylalanine, as an internal standard for accurate quantification, did not adequately compensate for the controlled epimerization of catechin to epicatechin. In contrast, the use of SIL-ISs led to the consistent catechin and epicatechin contents of the samples stored over various times. These results revealed that the use of SIL-ISs compensated for the epimerization effect.

Method validation

LC–MS was performed with catechin and epicatechin standards (0.02–5.00 μg/mL). Additionally, catechin-2,3,4-13C3 and epicatechin-2,3,4-13C3 as SIL-ISs (1.00 μg/mL) were used for the calibration curve. The following regression equations were obtained using catechin-2,3,4-13C3: y = 0.7598x + 0.014 and epicatechin-2,3,4-13C3: y = 0.9389x + 0.0317. Using SIL-ISs, the r2 values of 0.9999 and 0.9997 were obtained for catechin and epicatechin, respectively. The limit of detection and limit of quantification were 0.034 and 0.112 μg/mL, respectively, for catechin, and 0.024 and 0.073 μg/mL, respectively, for epicatechin. To determine the precision (RSD %) and accuracy (recovery %), we assessed four different concentrations (0.63, 1.25, 2.50, and 5.00 μg/mL) of catechin and epicatechin within the calibration curve (Table 1). The precision of the catechin-2,3,4-13C3 and epicatechin-2,3,4-13C3 standards (≤ 3.17%) was within the acceptable range according to the AOAC guidelines (for 1 μg/mL: ≤ 11.0%, for 10 μg/mL: ≤ 7.3%). In addition, the accuracy values for stable isotope dilution LC–MS (catechin-2,3,4-13C3 and epicatechin-2,3,4-13C3: 99.4–102.24%) were also within the acceptable ranges (for 1 μg/mL: 80–110%).

Table 1 LC–MS method precision (RSD, %) and accuracy (recovery, %) for catechin and epicatechin using SIL-IS
Full size table

To evaluate the precision and accuracy of the intra- (n = 3) and inter-day (n = 5) measurements, the red rice sample was spiked with two different concentrations (0.1 and 0.2 μg/mL) of catechin and epicatechin (Table 2). The precision values of the catechin-2,3,4-13C3 and epicatechin-2,3,4-13C3 standards were ≤ 6.66% in the intra- and inter-day (AOAC guidelines for 1 μg/mL: ≤ 11.0%). In addition, the accuracy values for the catechin-2,3,4-13C3 and epicatechin-2,3,4-13C3 assays in the intra- and inter-day measurements were good.

Table 2 Precision (RSD, %) and accuracy (recovery, %) for catechin and epicatechin in red rice using SIL-ISc
Full size table

In this study, we developed a novel and stable isotope dilution LC–MS method using catechin-2,3,4-13C3 and epicatechin-2,3,4-13C3 as SIL-ISs. The SIL-ISs compensated for the epimerization effect of the catechins because they had nearly the same chemical properties and underwent epimerization in a similar manner. To control the epimerization of catechin and epicatechin, we investigated the stability of catechin and epicatechin over 12 h and the ideal extraction conditions to reduce epimerization. The results indicate that the use of SIL-IS enabled the measurement of stable catechin and epicatechin contents over 12 h, unlike when L-2-chlorophenlyalanine was used as an internal standard. In addition, the ideal extraction conditions to reduce epimerization were 70 ℃ and 30 min. The developed novel and stable isotope dilution LC–MS method was validated according to the AOAC guidelines and exhibited acceptable validation results. In future work, experiments need to be devised to explain the chemical patterns of catechin formation by epimerization and degradation.

Availability of data and materials

The data and materials used in this study are available under permission from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AOAC:

Association of the Official Analytical Collaboration

LC–MS:

Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry

SIL-IS:

Stable-isotope-labeled internal standard

References

  1. Yoshida Y, Kiso M, Goto T (1999) Efficiency of the extraction of catechins from green tea. Food Chem 67:429–433

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Crespy V, Williamson G (2004) A review of the health effects of green tea catechins in in vivo animal models. J Nutr 134:3431S-3440S

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rains TM, Agarwal S, Maki KC (2011) Antiobesity effects of green tea catechins: a mechanistic review. J Nutr Biochem 22:1–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Xu J, Xu Z, Zheng W (2017) A review of the antiviral role of green tea catechins. Molecules 22:1337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim A, Chiu A, Barone MK, Avino D, Wang F, Coleman CI, Phung O (2011) Green tea catechins decrease total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Diet Assoc 111:1720–1729

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Alipour M, Malihi R, Hosseini SA, Abbasnezhad A, Ghavami A, Shahmohammadi HA, Ghanavati M (2018) The effects of catechins on related risk factors with type 2 diabetes: a review. Prog Nutr 20:12–20

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cheng Z, Zhang Z, Han Y, Wang J, Wang Y, Chen X, Shao Y, Cheng Y, Zhou W, Lu X, Wu Z (2020) A review on anti-cancer effect of green tea catechins. J Funct Foods 74:104172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ananingsih VK, Sharma A, Zhou W (2013) Green tea catechins during food processing and storage: a review on stability and detection. Int Food Res J 50:469–479

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Li W, Fong HH, Singletary KW, Fitzloff JF (2002) Determination of catechins in commercial grape seed extract. J Liq Chromatogr Relat 25:397–407

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sharma A, Zhou W (2011) A stability study of green tea catechins during the biscuit making process. Food Chem 126:568–573

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chang CL, Wu RT (2011) Quantification of (+)-catechin and (−)-epicatechin in coconut water by LC–MS. Food Chem 126:710–717

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. de Souza DF, Lovillo MP, Barroso CG, David JM (2010) Optimization and validation of a method for the direct determination of catechin and epicatechin in red wines by HPLC/fluorescence. Microchem J 96:17–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee MJ, Prabhu S, Meng X, Li C, Yang CS (2000) An improved method for the determination of green and black tea polyphenols in biomatrices by high-performance liquid chromatography with coulometric array detection. Anal Biochem 279:164–169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Horie H, Mukai T, Kohata K (1997) Simultaneous determination of qualitatively important components in green tea infusions using capillary electrophoresis. J Chromatogr A 758:332–335

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Horie H, Kohata K (2000) Analysis of tea components by high-performance liquid chromatography and high-performance capillary electrophoresis. J Chromatogr A 881:425–438

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Glavnik V, Simonovska B, Vovk I (2009) Densitometric determination of (+)-catechin and (−)-epicatechin by 4-dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde reagent. J Chromatogr A 1216:4485–4491

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen Q, Zhao J, Chaitep S, Guo Z (2009) Simultaneous analysis of main catechins contents in green tea (Camellia sinensis (L.)) by Fourier transform near infrared reflectance (FT-NIR) spectroscopy. Food chem 113:1272–1277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. de Souza DF, Silva MF, David JM (2013) Determination of quercetin, gallic acid, resveratrol, catechin and malvidin in Brazilian wines elaborated in the vale do são francisco using liquid–liquid extraction assisted by ultrasound and GC-MS. Food Anal Methods 6:963–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Donovan JL, Luthria DL, Stremple P, Waterhouse AL (1999) Analysis of (+)-catechin,(−)-epicatechin and their 3′-and 4′-O-methylated analogs: a comparison of sensitive methods. J Chromatogr B Biomed Appl 726:277–283

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang R, Zhou W, Jiang X (2008) Reaction kinetics of degradation and epimerization of epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) in aqueous system over a wide temperature range. J Agric Food Chem 56:2694–2701

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kiatgrajai P, Wellons J, Gollob L, White JD (1982) Kinetics of epimerization of (+)-catechin and its rearrangement to catechinic acid. J Org Chem 47:2910–2912

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Liang H, Liang Y, Dong J, Lu J (2007) Tea extraction methods in relation to control of epimerization of tea catechins. J Sci Food Agric 87:1748–1752

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Jian W, Edom RW, Xu Y, Gallagher J, Weng N (2010) otential bias and mitigations when using stable isotope labeled parent drug as internal standard for LC–MS/MS quantitation of metabolites. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 878(31):3267–3276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ermer J, Vogel M (2000) Applications of hyphenated LC-MS techniques in pharmaceutical analysis. Biomed Chromatogr 14(6):373–383

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lu X, Zhao X, Bai C, Zhao C, Lu G, Xu G (2008) LC–MS-based metabonomics analysis. J Chromatogr B 866(1–2):64–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim TJ, Kim SY, Park YJ, Lim SH, Ha SH, Park SU, Lee B, Kim JK (2021) Metabolite profiling reveals distinct modulation of complex metabolic networks in non-pigmented, black, and red rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars. Metabolites. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo11060367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Paez V, Barrett WB, Deng X, Diaz-Amigo C, Fiedler K, Fuerer C, Hostetler GL, Johnson P, Joseph G, Konings EJM, Lacorn M, Lawry J, Liu H, Marceau E, Mastovska K, Monteroso L, Pan SJ, Parker C, Phillips MM, Popping B, Radcliffe S, Rimmer CA, Roder M, Schreiber A, Sealey-Voyksner J, Shippar J, Siantar DP, Sullivan DM, Sundgaard J, Szpylka J, Turner J, Wirthwine B, Wubben JL, Yadlapalli S, Yang J, Yeung JM, Zweigenbaum J, Coates SG (2016) AOAC SMPR® 2016.002. J AOAC Int 99:1122–1124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ante L, Lamas PJ, Guerra E, Kopjar M, Lores M (2018) Thermal stability of catechin and epicatechin upon disaccharides addition. Int J Food Sci Technol 53(5):1195–1202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Latos-Brozio M, Masek A (2020) Natural polymeric compound based on high thermal stability catechin from green tea. Biomolecules 10(8):1191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported “Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development (Project No. PJ01706903)” funded by the Rural Development Administration (RDA), Republic of Korea, and by Research Assistance Program (2019) in the Incheon National University, Republic of Korea.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Tae Jin Kim and Ye Jin Kim are contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Life Sciences and Convergence Research Center for Insect Vectors, College of Life Sciences and Bioengineering, Incheon National University, Incheon, 22012, Republic of Korea

    Tae Jin Kim, Ye Jin Kim & Jae Kwang Kim

  2. Bio-Resource Industrialization Center, Nakdonggang National Institute of Biological Resources, Sangju-si, Gyeongbuk, 37242, Republic of Korea

    Tae Jin Kim

  3. Division of Crop Foundation, National Institute of Crop Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju, Jeonbuk, 55365, Republic of Korea

    Woo Duck Seo

  4. Department of Crop Science and Department of Smart Agriculture Systems, Chungnam National University, 99 Daehak-Ro, Daejeon, Yuseong-Gu, 34134, Republic of Korea

    Sang Un Park

Authors
  1. Tae Jin Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ye Jin Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Woo Duck Seo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sang Un Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jae Kwang Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

TJK carried out the experiments, prepared most of the data, and wrote the paper; YJK carried out the experiments, and prepared the data; JKK and SUP managed the research process, and reviewed and edited the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sang Un Park or Jae Kwang Kim.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that there is no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Experimental details for the analysis of catechin and epicatechin.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, T.J., Kim, Y.J., Seo, W.D. et al. Improved quantification of catechin and epicatechin in red rice (Oryza sativa L.) using stable isotope dilution liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Appl Biol Chem 65, 85 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13765-022-00754-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13765-022-00754-2

Keywords

  • Catechin
  • Epicatechin
  • Epimerization
  • Stable isotope
  • Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry